|
|
Schlager vs Amultart |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Heath
Member Joined: 04/24/2008 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 32 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 05/07/2008 at 2:52am |
Hi guys,
I'd like to know from people who have experianced playing with both blades, how they compare with each other. I feel they are similar in design, but i'd like to know how they differ. Both are 3 plywood 2 carbon, and both around the same thickness. Schlager = 7.4mm and Amultart being 7.1mm. The only main structural difference i can note from observation is the difference in the carbon fibre plies. So how does this differ in the play style? I've found the schlager blade to be stiff, resposive and very fast, however the blade managers to produce a lot of spin considering it is such a fast blade. The combination of schlager i have used is with Sonex JP gold 2.0mm, and Coppa Gold 2.0mm. Thanks |
|
Andro Kinetic Carbo-Aramid OFF ST - Tenergy 05 BH | TG3 #21 FH Nittaku Acoustic ST & FL - H3 #21 Blue FH | Tenergy 05 BH |
|
Sponsored Links | |
Heath
Member Joined: 04/24/2008 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 32 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
anybody have any amultart reviews?
|
|
Andro Kinetic Carbo-Aramid OFF ST - Tenergy 05 BH | TG3 #21 FH Nittaku Acoustic ST & FL - H3 #21 Blue FH | Tenergy 05 BH |
|
tdragon
Platinum Member Joined: 01/26/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2060 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If you do some search on the forum, you could find tons of reviews. People just don't want to keep repeating same old thing. Too bad that I don't own Amultar to give you some info
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |