|
|
Tensor rubber users: what thickness? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
shaolinTT
Silver Member Joined: 03/14/2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 939 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 08/05/2011 at 11:14pm |
Just want to know what thickness of tensor rubbers you use.
Does 0.2mm make a big difference? FH or BH? Thanks!
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
bluebucket
Platinum Member Joined: 02/20/2011 Location: 16 Status: Offline Points: 2882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
On most tensors, if you have a strong FH it's no problem using max but most people wont on the backhand. Just listen to the rubber for a guide, if you can't get a loud click from it looping then you aren't strong enough to use that size or hardness sponge. Very very few people have a good enough backhand to use max there
|
|
TheRobot99
Silver Member Joined: 10/21/2010 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I use max all the time, but I can probably get away with it since I use slower all-wood blades.
When I'm ready, I can crank some hot shots though. |
|
Ross Leidy Custom, DHS Hurricane III Neos, Nittaku Nodias
Xiom Fuga, Globe 999 National 39, Nittaku Nodias JOOLA Torre All+, DHS Hurricane II #19 Sponge, Galaxy Moon 38 PTTC VP - 2011-12 |
|
haggisv
Forum Moderator Dark Knight Joined: 06/28/2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 5110 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It depends on your blade as well... a rock hard blade will bottom out easily with a thinner and soft tensor, but it might not bottom out as easily on a softer blade.
|
|
arg0
Platinum Member Joined: 07/22/2009 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2023 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I never use rubbers thicker than 2.0m. I've tried max and I felt it made a big difference.
Maybe you won't notice 0.1-0.2mm but you definitively will notice 0.3-0.4mm difference. |
|
Skyline
Premier Member Joined: 07/01/2007 Status: Offline Points: 3864 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Tensor rubbers are fast and springy. So to maintain some control 2.0 is fine for me especially on my backhand.
|
|
scdit46
Super Member Joined: 12/08/2010 Status: Offline Points: 397 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
In a Tenergy 05 is most controlable in 1.9mm than 2.1mm?
|
|
vanjr
Gold Member Joined: 08/19/2004 Location: Corpus Christi Status: Offline Points: 1368 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Getting a tensor in anything but max is like buying a turbo charged economy car. It doesn't make much sense to me.
|
|
arg0
Platinum Member Joined: 07/22/2009 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2023 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I respect your opinion but I disagree. Many players (me included) need a workhorse blade rather than a Ferrari, so a tensor in 2.0 or less is perfectly adequate.
|
|
Anton Chigurh
Premier Member Joined: 09/15/2009 Status: Offline Points: 3962 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
+1 I recently went from max to 2.0mm on both wings and my game improved significantly. For me, 2.0mm is more forgiving on "imperfect impacts" on the ball, as well as making it easier to block down higher rated players. Yet, there is still enough power to produce winning kill shots. |
|
Neo H3 40D| Offensive S | Tenergy 80
|
|
Mdman
Gold Member Joined: 04/09/2009 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1017 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I tried 1.9 and it is not very good for looping only good for smashed.
So I went back to 2.1 They are very different. 1.9 is great for blocking spinny loops. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |