Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - why women don't use carbon?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login
tabletennis11.com

why women don't use carbon?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
sa01 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 05/28/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1189
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sa01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: why women don't use carbon?
    Posted: 04/01/2012 at 8:31pm
is there any professional woman using carbon blade?
why do they mostly use wood?
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
ztec View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/14/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 414
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ztec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 8:36pm
If I'm not mistaken, Zhang Yining played with a ZLC blade. But yes, it would appear most of the top women prefer all wood blades, most likely because they play so close to the table and they don't really have the same type of power game that many mens players have. So they don't really need the extra pop from a carbon blade. 
Your play will change your opinion of your equipment more than your equipment will change your opinion of your play.
Back to Top
sa01 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 05/28/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1189
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sa01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 9:26pm
this would imply that the only advantage of carbon is speed....
Back to Top
Baal View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator


Joined: 01/21/2010
Location: unknown
Status: Offline
Points: 14336
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Baal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 9:33pm
Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

this would imply that the only advantage of carbon is speed....


I wonder if it is really true that a higher percentage of women than men use all-wood blades (among, say, the top 100 in the world)?  Supposedly, the "sweet spot" is larger with carbon, but top women in the world don't mis-hit the ball very often, so I doubt that would be the reason.   
Back to Top
patrick1v View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 06/16/2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1497
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote patrick1v Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 9:35pm
i think liu shiwen usese her own "named" blade
Back to Top
sa01 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 05/28/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1189
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sa01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 9:47pm
Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

this would imply that the only advantage of carbon is speed....


I wonder if it is really true that a higher percentage of women than men use all-wood blades (among, say, the top 100 in the world)?  Supposedly, the "sweet spot" is larger with carbon, but top women in the world don't mis-hit the ball very often, so I doubt that would be the reason.   


the only thing I can think of is that wood has more control.
but supposedly carbon adds control so?
for men I can think of many that use composite.
for women not so many.


Edited by sa01 - 04/01/2012 at 9:48pm
Back to Top
cotdt View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 10/19/2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cotdt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 10:01pm
carbon adds control???
Nittaku Resound
FH: Joola Timeless
BH: Joola Timeless
Back to Top
cotdt View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 10/19/2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cotdt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 10:10pm
The best control composite blade I've used is the TB ZLF, and that has no carbon at all!
Nittaku Resound
FH: Joola Timeless
BH: Joola Timeless
Back to Top
sa01 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 05/28/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1189
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sa01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 10:17pm
Originally posted by cotdt cotdt wrote:

carbon adds control???


does it?
Back to Top
jrscatman View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/19/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 4585
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jrscatman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 10:21pm
Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

Originally posted by cotdt cotdt wrote:

carbon adds control???

does it?
I would think it would add more control - because the carbon should make the blade stiffer. Stiffer blades would have more control than flexible blades. 


Butterfly MPS
FH: Donic Acuda S1
BH: Palio CK531A OX
Back to Top
Baal View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator


Joined: 01/21/2010
Location: unknown
Status: Offline
Points: 14336
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Baal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 10:30pm
Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

this would imply that the only advantage of carbon is speed....


I wonder if it is really true that a higher percentage of women than men use all-wood blades (among, say, the top 100 in the world)?  Supposedly, the "sweet spot" is larger with carbon, but top women in the world don't mis-hit the ball very often, so I doubt that would be the reason.   


the only thing I can think of is that wood has more control.
but supposedly carbon adds control so?
for men I can think of many that use composite.
for women not so many.


sa01, Your comment just brought something to my mind.  Perhaps because they men play from farther back and hit so much harder, torsion and flex in the blade is a bigger problem for them than it is for women, who don't rip the ball as hard.  So, maybe the reason is that carbon adds control when you are using a great deal of power (like men).  According to this theory, none of the top players, men or women, use carbon or composite because they need more speed or  power on the ball.  Instead, they use it because it allows them to control the power without having excessive flex and vibration.  I guess it's what you are saying, but with an explanation for the preference. It is definitely an interesting question. 
Back to Top
sa01 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 05/28/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1189
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sa01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 10:54pm
maybe the reason is that it adds power in the long range.
some players have plenty of power (ma long, wang liqin) so they use wood while others need that extra power from the racket (timo boll, zhang jike).
women don't play much far from table so theoretically they would not need this advantage of composite.
so the conclusion would be that they consider all wood better except when you don't have enough power far from table (or have enough but want more).
to make it clear I'm talking about carbon as a 2nd ply, that's when you really feel it.
liu shiwen uses it as a 3 ply so it's like almost you can't tell.
feng tianwei uses tube carbo so it doesn't count either.


Edited by sa01 - 04/01/2012 at 10:55pm
Back to Top
cotdt View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 10/19/2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cotdt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 10:55pm
Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

this would imply that the only advantage of carbon is speed....


I wonder if it is really true that a higher percentage of women than men use all-wood blades (among, say, the top 100 in the world)?  Supposedly, the "sweet spot" is larger with carbon, but top women in the world don't mis-hit the ball very often, so I doubt that would be the reason.   


the only thing I can think of is that wood has more control.
but supposedly carbon adds control so?
for men I can think of many that use composite.
for women not so many.


sa01, Your comment just brought something to my mind.  Perhaps because they men play from farther back and hit so much harder, torsion and flex in the blade is a bigger problem for them than it is for women, who don't rip the ball as hard.  So, maybe the reason is that carbon adds control when you are using a great deal of power (like men).  According to this theory, none of the top players, men or women, use carbon or composite because they need more speed or  power on the ball.  Instead, they use it because it allows them to control the power without having excessive flex and vibration.  I guess it's what you are saying, but with an explanation for the preference. It is definitely an interesting question. 


Ma Long with his all-wood blade hits with more power than Mitzutani Jun with his carbon blade and Ma Long would beat him over and over again.
Nittaku Resound
FH: Joola Timeless
BH: Joola Timeless
Back to Top
sa01 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 05/28/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1189
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sa01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/01/2012 at 11:14pm
Originally posted by cotdt cotdt wrote:

Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

this would imply that the only advantage of carbon is speed....


I wonder if it is really true that a higher percentage of women than men use all-wood blades (among, say, the top 100 in the world)?  Supposedly, the "sweet spot" is larger with carbon, but top women in the world don't mis-hit the ball very often, so I doubt that would be the reason.   


the only thing I can think of is that wood has more control.
but supposedly carbon adds control so?
for men I can think of many that use composite.
for women not so many.


sa01, Your comment just brought something to my mind.  Perhaps because they men play from farther back and hit so much harder, torsion and flex in the blade is a bigger problem for them than it is for women, who don't rip the ball as hard.  So, maybe the reason is that carbon adds control when you are using a great deal of power (like men).  According to this theory, none of the top players, men or women, use carbon or composite because they need more speed or  power on the ball.  Instead, they use it because it allows them to control the power without having excessive flex and vibration.  I guess it's what you are saying, but with an explanation for the preference. It is definitely an interesting question. 


Ma Long with his all-wood blade hits with more power than Mitzutani Jun with his carbon blade and Ma Long would beat him over and over again.


that's because ma long has more arm power than mizutani....
this justifies my theory that you only use composite when you need more power.


Edited by sa01 - 04/01/2012 at 11:19pm
Back to Top
konnichwakid1 View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member
Avatar

Joined: 04/01/2011
Location: Cali
Status: Offline
Points: 277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote konnichwakid1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 12:09am
Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

Originally posted by cotdt cotdt wrote:

Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

this would imply that the only advantage of carbon is speed....


I wonder if it is really true that a higher percentage of women than men use all-wood blades (among, say, the top 100 in the world)?  Supposedly, the "sweet spot" is larger with carbon, but top women in the world don't mis-hit the ball very often, so I doubt that would be the reason.   


the only thing I can think of is that wood has more control.
but supposedly carbon adds control so?
for men I can think of many that use composite.
for women not so many.


sa01, Your comment just brought something to my mind.  Perhaps because they men play from farther back and hit so much harder, torsion and flex in the blade is a bigger problem for them than it is for women, who don't rip the ball as hard.  So, maybe the reason is that carbon adds control when you are using a great deal of power (like men).  According to this theory, none of the top players, men or women, use carbon or composite because they need more speed or  power on the ball.  Instead, they use it because it allows them to control the power without having excessive flex and vibration.  I guess it's what you are saying, but with an explanation for the preference. It is definitely an interesting question. 


Ma Long with his all-wood blade hits with more power than Mitzutani Jun with his carbon blade and Ma Long would beat him over and over again.


that's because ma long has more arm power than mizutani....
this justifies my theory that you only use composite when you need more power.

I am currently playing the Jun Mizutani blade with T05 2.1 and T64 2.1 and it is one of the slowest setups I have ever used. TB ALC is my other setup and it is almost 2x as fast. 
Jun Mizutani with Tenergies
Back to Top
kenneyy88 View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 01/06/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4074
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kenneyy88 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 12:12am
I thought a lot of women players switched to some composite after speed glue ban. 
Back to Top
Fruit loop View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 05/14/2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 605
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Fruit loop Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 12:36am
I find that carbon adds more control at mid distance but i don't feel that it's too much faster, just faster rebound. I just got the 7 ply osp blade and i've never hit the ball faster and i feel especially 3m+ off the table it's a lot quicker than any carbon blade i've used simply because of the amount of flex in the blade. This being said, my technique could be a lot better now..
Timo Boll Spirit FL
Dr Evil ox both sides.
Back to Top
Imago View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 07/19/2009
Location: Sofia
Status: Offline
Points: 5897
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Imago Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 3:23am
Because they don't like it hard.
Back to Top
Fruit loop View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 05/14/2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 605
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Fruit loop Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 4:14am
Originally posted by Imago Imago wrote:

Because they don't like it hard.

Never heard that complaint before
Timo Boll Spirit FL
Dr Evil ox both sides.
Back to Top
bbkon View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member


Joined: 04/19/2005
Location: Afghanistan
Status: Offline
Points: 7260
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bbkon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 5:09am
Originally posted by sa01 sa01 wrote:

is there any professional woman using carbon blade?
why do they mostly use wood?

boros,dodean and several from europe
Back to Top
APW46 View Drop Down
Assistant Moderator
Assistant Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 02/02/2009
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote APW46 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 6:49am
Both have a different feel that is all, its personal preference. 
The Older I get, The better I was.
Back to Top
speaquinox View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/19/2007
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 1742
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote speaquinox Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 8:31am
They do. Mostly Europeans, not much different than men.
Innerforce ALC, Glayzer / Rozena
Back to Top
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 10:02am
I believe that not nearly as many professional men use carbon as what is advertised, although certainly some percentage does. When I read the weights, setups of what some of the chinese women were using (and this was probably 7-8 years ago) I was surpsrised how heavy...often 200g plus.  I think maybe they are getting power from the sheer weight of the blade.

Edited by cole_ely - 04/02/2012 at 10:03am
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
seguso View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/24/2010
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 1619
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote seguso Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 11:15am
I would say the reason is the following:

A typical carbon blade reduces dwell time. This reduces spin, lowers throw, and produces longer trajectories. This makes it difficult to play close to table. But, for some reason X, women need to play close to table. Therefore successful female players cannot use carbon.

All is needed to complete the explanation is to express X, the reason why women must play close to table. Maybe they are too short to play far from table, or their legs are too weak.
pg5x - mxd fh & bh - 2015 video
Back to Top
zzz View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member
Avatar

Joined: 09/30/2010
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 342
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote zzz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 11:53am
Originally posted by cotdt cotdt wrote:

Ma Long with his all-wood blade hits with more power than Mitzutani Jun with his carbon blade and Ma Long would beat him over and over again.

Most of the chinese top players are using all-wood blades.
Ma Long, Ma Lin, Wang Hao, Xu Xin, Wang Liqin...
Virtuoso+ :: Mark V :: Mark V
Back to Top
vvu.tee View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/31/2010
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 236
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote vvu.tee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 4:20pm
Ma Long used to play with TBS and ALC with equal facility and effect... my guess is the pros can play with anything.
(1) BTY T64 - BTY M.MAZE - BTY T05
(2) BTY T64 - BTY M.MAZE - DHS H3 Neo Provincial
Back to Top
sa01 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 05/28/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1189
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sa01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/02/2012 at 9:29pm
Originally posted by zzz zzz wrote:

Originally posted by cotdt cotdt wrote:

Ma Long with his all-wood blade hits with more power than Mitzutani Jun with his carbon blade and Ma Long would beat him over and over again.

Most of the chinese top players are using all-wood blades.
Ma Long, Ma Lin, Wang Hao, Xu Xin, Wang Liqin...


I think penholders don't count here, their technique is different.
in shakehanders you have
wlq, ma long (wood)
zhang jike, yan an (composite)
hao shuai, chen qi (not sure at this point but used tbs or mmaze)
Back to Top
HowToPlayChineseLoop View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member
Avatar

Joined: 02/06/2012
Location: 0
Status: Offline
Points: 266
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote HowToPlayChineseLoop Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/03/2012 at 3:23pm
Clap
Originally posted by seguso seguso wrote:

I would say the reason is the following:

A typical carbon blade reduces dwell time. This reduces spin, lowers throw, and produces longer trajectories. This makes it difficult to play close to table. But, for some reason X, women need to play close to table. Therefore successful female players cannot use carbon.

All is needed to complete the explanation is to express X, the reason why women must play close to table. Maybe they are too short to play far from table, or their legs are too weak.

Clap Right !

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.

Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Web Wiz News
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer

MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd.

Copyright ©2003-2024 Alex Table Tennis Ltd. All rights reserved.