Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Tangible instructions
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tangible instructions

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
racquetsforsale View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 10/02/2010
Location: at the table
Status: Offline
Points: 1268
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote racquetsforsale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Tangible instructions
    Posted: 07/03/2014 at 2:24pm
When teaching stroke production, do you think it's realistic and useful to describe the characteristics of the incoming ball with only the following parameters?

Speed, type of spin, rate of spin, trajectory, and depth.

Likewise, do you think there's value to teaching the student how the paddle needs to contact the ball by describing the characteristics of the paddle's approach towards the ball using only the following parameters?

Timing of contact, angle of swing, angle of paddle face, speed of swing, amount of hitting, and amount of brushing.

I've seen students become frustrated or make improvements very slowly because their teachers use very abstract language in their instruction, e.g.,
"The ball needs to stay on your paddle a little longer."

"You need to grip the ball more."

I think it might be more productive to tell the student 1) what needs to happen, e.g.,
"You need to brush more and hit less by matching your paddle angle with your swing angle, or vice versa."

"Your paddle is not moving fast enough at contact. You need to swing faster."

"You're swinging at too steep an angle (too much towards vertical)."

"You're hitting the ball too early (or too late)."

and then 2) the body mechanics needed to make it happen.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
suds79 View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 08/20/2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 878
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suds79 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/03/2014 at 2:38pm
I'm a big proponent of coaching to show someone how to do with with less verbal instruction. Clear your mind of thoughts when hitting.

It's a concept from the book I read not too long ago called in the inner game of tennis.

Basically what he found was this. The more he coached people with "set your feet" "follow through ending up by your shoulder" etc... the more robotic and poor performance they gave trying to go through the 6 or 7 instructions to hit a simple backhand.

Rather, he had the most success when he'd say to his students "just watch me for a moment and try to emulate what you see."... And voilà, they would automatically do the correct strokes.




Edited by suds79 - 07/03/2014 at 3:43pm
Back to Top
racquetsforsale View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 10/02/2010
Location: at the table
Status: Offline
Points: 1268
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote racquetsforsale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/03/2014 at 3:03pm
I agree with you Suds. Too much information can also swing the student in the other direction.

I speak from personal experience. When I started, my teacher used the vague phrases I mentioned to make corrections, telling me I'm not gripping the ball or I didn't have enough dwell time. I didn't know what the hell to do with that input. I eventually figured it out on my own: I was hitting too much and not brushing enough and I was not swinging fast enough through contact.
Back to Top
zeio View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member


Joined: 03/25/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 10833
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote zeio Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/03/2014 at 6:16pm
It depends at what stage the students are. Most are usually started off with one-shot multi-ball, and the pattern and qualities of the feed are pretty much fixed, so the students are relieved of the extra burden. Once they reach the rally stage, the returning ball becomes a factor and recovery plays an important role. Other than adjustments in stroke, a good deal of footwork is necessary to compensate for the nuances in every return.

BTW, it's been a while. Good to have you back.

Edited by zeio - 07/03/2014 at 6:16pm
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare)
+ Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃)
= 184.8g
Back to Top
yogi_bear View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 11/25/2004
Location: Philippines
Status: Offline
Points: 7219
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote yogi_bear Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/03/2014 at 7:02pm
shadow drill for a specific drill then multiball drill then single ball table drill for each stroke. this is the order that i use to teach and let the player learn and master the stroke.
Independent online TT Product reviewer of XIOM, STIGA, JOOLA, SANWEI, GEWO, AIR, ITC, APEX, YASAKA and ABROS

ITTF Level 1 Coaching Course Conductor, ITTF Level 1 Coach
Back to Top
racquetsforsale View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 10/02/2010
Location: at the table
Status: Offline
Points: 1268
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote racquetsforsale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/03/2014 at 7:02pm
Thanks, zeio.
Back to Top
hithithit View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 07/02/2014
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 319
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hithithit Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/03/2014 at 7:57pm
Originally posted by racquetsforsale racquetsforsale wrote:

When teaching stroke production, do you think it's realistic and useful to describe the characteristics of the incoming ball with only the following parameters?

Speed, type of spin, rate of spin, trajectory, and depth.



It depends on what level the students are on, and what you are trying to achieve - so that list can shrink / grow.

Quote
Likewise, do you think there's value to teaching the student how the paddle needs to contact the ball by describing the characteristics of the paddle's approach towards the ball using only the following parameters?

Timing of contact, angle of swing, angle of paddle face, speed of swing, amount of hitting, and amount of brushing.


Same answer as previous. It depends on what level the students are on, and what you are trying to achieve - so that list can shrink / grow.

Quote
I've seen students become frustrated or make improvements very slowly because their teachers use very abstract language in their instruction, e.g.,
"The ball needs to stay on your paddle a little longer."

"You need to grip the ball more."

I think it might be more productive to tell the student 1) what needs to happen, e.g.,
"You need to brush more and hit less by matching your paddle angle with your swing angle, or vice versa."

"Your paddle is not moving fast enough at contact. You need to swing faster."

"You're swinging at too steep an angle (too much towards vertical)."

"You're hitting the ball too early (or too late)."


I don't think the problem here is the abstract language used in the instruction. I think it is to do with how the lesson is structured. Ideally, each lesson should focus on a small number of things. That way, the instructions are clear and there won't be too much to think about during that particular lesson - more effective way of learning and less frustration for everyone.

For example, teaching students how to execute a basic top spin shot could perhaps be broken into a number of lessons:

Lesson A: i) the racket angle, ii) the upward forehand movement, and iii) the brushing contact. Ignore everything else. So if a student cannot land the shot onto the opponent's side of the table, downplay it as this will be covered in an upcoming lesson. So, once the students are competent with lesson A, move to lesson B.

Lesson B: i) the starting and ending positions, ii) racket speed and iii) trajectory. Ignore everything not covered in lessons A and B. Once the students are competent with lesson B, move to lesson C.

Lesson C: i) getting the ball onto the opponents side of the table, ii) speed, iii) direction. Ignore everything not covered in lessons A, B and C. Once the students are competent with lesson C, move to lesson D.

Lesson D: i) how to counter top spin with side spin. Ignore everything not covered in lessons A, B, C and D. Once the students are competent with lesson D, move to lesson E.

And so forth.

Quote and then 2) the body mechanics needed to make it happen.

When describing a stroke, it is best done by showing.

Edited by hithithit - 07/03/2014 at 8:24pm
Back to Top
kenneyy88 View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 01/06/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4074
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kenneyy88 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/03/2014 at 9:06pm
Use whatever gets through to a student, if they don't understand something, explain it in different words. 
Back to Top
V-Griper View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 09/19/2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 879
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote V-Griper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/04/2014 at 1:38pm
It's difficult to hold allot of variables in one's head at any given time so the fewer things they have to hold in their working memory at one time the better. I usually try identify 3 or 4 major problems that a player has and try not to add more in any given session.

 Even better is to come up with some kind of drill or game that forces the correct thing with little or no verbal instruction at all. For example there was the post by tt4me about lifting the ball as it rolls off the edge of the table. When I had other people try it they all made good adjustments to their stroke mechanics, touch and timing with few or no verbal cues. 

Also, coming up with mental images that "stick' with the person, such as having a big pat of butter on the blade and you are trying to smear or spread the butter on the ball like you would on toast. It's why we use the term "brush" in the first place. Things like that can convey the feel without having to go into too much particulate detail. The thing is to come up with different visualizations that will connect with the player. Obviously it depends on the person as well. Some people respond well to a technical description and model of what they are trying to do.

IME the one thing that seems to work consistently in teaching people to loop the ball well, initially,  is focusing on where the ball is when contact is made. I usually ask them to wait until the ball is falling before ball contact is made. I try to get them to wait as long as possible in the beginning so that the shot has a  high spin to speed ratio. 





DHS 301
Xiom Vega 7pro FH/BH
Back to Top
tt4me View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 01/17/2013
Location: RC Poverty Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 1019
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tt4me Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/04/2014 at 3:04pm
Originally posted by racquetsforsale racquetsforsale wrote:

I've seen students become frustrated or make improvements very slowly because their teachers use very abstract language in their instruction, e.g.,
"The ball needs to stay on your paddle a little longer."

"You need to grip the ball more."
I agree saying this too students is useless.

I have always objected to the imprecise language and TT myths The fact that it is allowed to continue makes things worse for those trying to learn.
However, most students will probably not be physics majors so I think it is best to keep things simple and show more by example.  I think it is easy to explain most shots using a robot.  Sometimes a white board will work too.  Nothing is really that difficult to explain or show.  It is the execution that is difficult.

Back to Top
hookumsnivy View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/04/2010
Location: Syracuse, NY
Status: Offline
Points: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hookumsnivy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/04/2014 at 10:55pm
I'm someone who likes to hear a lot of the details.  Watching someone do the stroke is not nearly enough for me.  Unless I know what I'm looking for in the stroke, I find it difficult to put it all together.

I find timing is a critical component that is often missing in explanations.  It's very important to know the best time to hit a certain shot - right off the bounce, still on the way up, at the peak, just after the peak, or even later.
Another important aspect is where in relation to your body should you be making contact.  
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14822
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/04/2014 at 11:14pm
Richard McAfee does it in three parts:

1.  Where to contact the ball (top, back, side, bottom etc.)
2.  When to contact the ball (rise or before top, fall or after top, top of the bounce or peak)
3.  How to contact the ball (friction or force contact)

Once you know these three things, the rest is all racket head speed.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
racquetsforsale View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 10/02/2010
Location: at the table
Status: Offline
Points: 1268
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote racquetsforsale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/07/2014 at 12:43am
Originally posted by NextLevel NextLevel wrote:

Richard McAfee does it in three parts:

1.  Where to contact the ball (top, back, side, bottom etc.)
2.  When to contact the ball (rise or before top, fall or after top, top of the bounce or peak)
3.  How to contact the ball (friction or force contact)

Once you know these three things, the rest is all racket head speed.

I like this breakdown a lot.
Back to Top
benfb View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: 10/10/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2709
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote benfb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/07/2014 at 1:56am
I was trying to relate this discussion to the training at our Stellan camps. I think the points about ball contact, such as brushing and hitting late or early, are always covered. But I also think there's a lot more on how you make the stroke: the footwork to get there and the body mechanics to make the stroke. For example, there are many ways of increasing racket speed but most of them also decrease consistency. Do it with the right footwork and stroke, and you don't lose consistency.
Back to Top
hithithit View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 07/02/2014
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 319
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hithithit Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/07/2014 at 2:05am
Originally posted by benfb benfb wrote:

I was trying to relate this discussion to the training at our Stellan camps. I think the points about ball contact, such as brushing and hitting late or early, are always covered. But I also think there's a lot more on how you make the stroke: the footwork to get there and the body mechanics to make the stroke. For example, there are many ways of increasing racket speed but most of them also decrease consistency. Do it with the right footwork and stroke, and you don't lose consistency.


Agreed.
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14822
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/07/2014 at 8:58am
Originally posted by benfb benfb wrote:

I was trying to relate this discussion to the training at our Stellan camps. I think the points about ball contact, such as brushing and hitting late or early, are always covered. But I also think there's a lot more on how you make the stroke: the footwork to get there and the body mechanics to make the stroke. For example, there are many ways of increasing racket speed but most of them also decrease consistency. Do it with the right footwork and stroke, and you don't lose consistency.

This is true, but the "right" footwork and the "right" stroke are sometimes things that most of us in adulthood have long passed the window where we can acquire these things smoothly (some of us even have physical limitations that make it virtually impossible).  I think it is as important if not more so to understand the principles and see what you can incorporate when you put in the hours rather than looking at the "right" way, which you may never be able to mimic.  I see many people putting in time on footwork drills when they don't even have a quality stroke that would cause the opponent problems when they execute it.  Unless they are young and aspiring players, where these drills instill habits that are required to stay in place as a player gets better, that makes no sense to me and is an inversion of priorities for most amateur players.  
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.891 seconds.

Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Web Wiz News
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer

MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd.

Copyright ©2003-2024 Alex Table Tennis Ltd. All rights reserved.