|
|
Tournament balls in Tx |
Post Reply |
Author | |
mjamja
Platinum Member Joined: 05/30/2009 Status: Offline Points: 2895 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 01/24/2015 at 6:32pm |
Buying new club balls soon. Would like to know what balls various clubs in Tx will be using for their tournaments in 2015
Mark
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
At HTTA we will use XSF. Our tournaments are never sanctioned. At Texas training center also in Houston they seem to be sticking with celluloid -- certainly for the next tournament they will have.
|
|
Jeff(ATTC)
Gold Member Joined: 09/22/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1166 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Austin TTC is using a variety of plastic balls (you have to bring your own balls); For their tournament last weekend they used Nittaku 40+ Premiums. I'm trying to get the clubs in the RGV to use plastic- so far only the university players and a few regular club members have taken on to them.
|
|
Bty Jun Mizutani ZLC
FH: D80 BH: D05 |
|
mjamja
Platinum Member Joined: 05/30/2009 Status: Offline Points: 2895 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Went ahead and ordered Yinhe balls for regular club play. We will also get some Nittaku 40+ premium and set them aside for guys training for upcoming tournament that will use those.
Mark
|
|
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Mark, Yinhe/XSF is a pretty good ball to use to train for tournaments with NP40+. They share much the same bounce. I would suggest a day or two before to switch to NP40+. I can get used to the switch from one to the other in about 20 min, but just to be sure give it a day or two.
|
|
roundrobin
Premier Member Joined: 10/02/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4708 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I learned the hard way last Saturday at our weekly RR tournament that there's enough difference between the XSF and NP40+ balls to severely affect my timing when big things are at stake. Right after I played 3 matches with the XSF, I played the next match with NP40+ at my opponent's insistence and almost lost it. The ball was coming to me noticeably slower and shorter, enough so that I had to move forward more to add speed to the ball, but even then the ball traveled slower than I'd have liked. My opponent was able to repeatedly attack my blocks with full power due to NP40+'s slower speed. I played my next semifinal match, and the final with the XSF ball and everything (speed, bounce) felt normal again. Next time I'd make my case to stick to the XSF ball for the entire tournament for sure. |
|
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986. Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association. My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red |
|
wturber
Premier Member Joined: 10/28/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3899 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I did some pretty good bounce tests on some plastic balls and the result was that NP40+ bounce pretty much the same as celluloid, XSF bounce a bit more - right at the ITTF upper limit of an allowable bounce. DHS and variants bounce clearly lower than celluloid and NP40+ and a lot lower than XSF. Nothing new, here really. So it makes sense that NP40+ balls would play slower and shorter. Note: I tested two celluloid balls. DHS 3* and Gamber Platinum 3*. The bounce of both balls were very similar. I'll test more celluloid balls, but for now this sample of two types suggests that bounce variation between different brand/makes of celluloid balls is smaller than between different brand/makes of plastic.
Edited by wturber - 01/26/2015 at 4:00pm |
|
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX |
|
NextLevel
Forum Moderator Joined: 12/15/2011 Location: Somewhere Good Status: Offline Points: 14844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That the celluloid variance is lower hardly needs testing. That one can adjust between XSF and Nittaku doesn't mean that the balls don't play differently enough for someone to be affected by a switch from one to the other in the midst of competitive play. They definitely do. Nittaku is a bit slower, IMO.
|
|
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon FH/BH: H3P 41D. Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train... |
|
wturber
Premier Member Joined: 10/28/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3899 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Right. My point was/is that empirical testing supports that I'd expect an adjustment between the NP40+ and XSF that would be more significant than I'd expect from switching between two different brands of celluloid balls. The difference between DHS and XSF is even greater. I would like to test a few more celluloid balls given my small sample size of two brands. But I don't expect much variance. |
|
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX |
|
mjamja
Platinum Member Joined: 05/30/2009 Status: Offline Points: 2895 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Other day hit with 3XSF and 3 NP+ at same time. When both close to table not noticeable diff. When both backed off table the diff described really showed up. Always having to come forward and reach down to hit the NP+. With NP+ felt I could hit full out without hitting long. Had to ease up just a little or really make sure to spin it with the XSF.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |