|
|
Acuda Blue Series vs Bluestorm series |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Stavros
Gold Member Joined: 12/02/2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1533 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 04/25/2018 at 7:02am |
May someone compare ?
|
|
Blade: Stiga Infinity
FH: Dignics 80 BH: Dignics 05 |
|
Sponsored Links | |
SmackDAT
Platinum Member Joined: 01/01/2012 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 2231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Acuda Blue is lower throw, smaller pores and more linear.
|
|
jk92
Super Member Joined: 09/29/2015 Location: Toronto Status: Offline Points: 389 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Played with Acuda Blue P2 for almost a year before switching to Bluestorm Z3 (exclusively on backhand)
Agree with SmackDAT, Acuda blue is more linear, a touch more spin. Bluestorm is explosive, yet easy to put balls back on the table. The 45 degree P2 moving towards the Z3's 42.5 degree sponge was very easy, and at first the Z3 felt actually a bit firmer than the P2, but the middle thickness of P2 was 2.0mm and the middle thickness of Z3 was 2.1 so that might have something to do with it. I always liked P2 for its thin topsheet and thicker sponge ratio, so it was natural to go to z3. I am still concerned that Z2 is too hard at 47.5 to put on backhand
|
|
Timo Boll CAF Penhold
Donic Bluegrip R1 Andro Hexer Grip SFX |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |