|
|
|
Tackifire C Unglued? |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
ssiew968 
Super Member 
Joined: 12/17/2004 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Points: 399 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Tackifire C Unglued?Posted: 01/22/2007 at 3:05am |
|
I am currently using Hammond X for FH. It's great but somehow not tacky enough (at least for me).
Thought of changing to Tackifire C which should be of similar characteristic of HX but the problem is I dont glue.
Appreciate your opinion on this rubber being unglued.
|
|
|
FH:Xiom Omega IV Pro Max
BH:Donic Acuda S1 Max Butterfly Innerforce ZLC (flare) |
|
 |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
dinchu
Super Member
Joined: 05/11/2005 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/22/2007 at 3:15am |
|
don't waste your money if you're not going to glue it regulary, without glue, it has no control, is really hard and fast impossible to block.
you have to try it glued!!!!! is amazing
|
|
|
|
|
shij421
Gold Member 
Joined: 12/09/2004 Location: Toronto Status: Offline Points: 1657 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/22/2007 at 11:59pm |
|
I think the golden rule is tacky topsheet = speedglue
|
|
|
Violin FL
Tenergy 05 2.1 Black Tenergy 05 FX 2.1 Red |
|
|
|
|
joey5867
Silver Member 
Joined: 02/28/2005 Location: Puerto Rico Status: Offline Points: 882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/23/2007 at 2:10pm |
|
I don't think that Tackifire C is similar to Hammond X.
|
|
|
BLD: NITTAKU Sanalion S
FH: DONIC Sonex JP 2.0 BH: DONIC Sonex JP 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
kollins
Super Member
Joined: 01/26/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 256 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/26/2007 at 11:07pm |
|
noooooooooothing alike.
I only think tackifire C is good for smash and chops. otherwise a horrible rubber. |
|
|
Shibutani ST
Tackifire C Feint Soft |
|
|
|
|
hubie60
Super Member
Joined: 10/28/2004 Location: Jamaica Status: Offline Points: 224 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/27/2007 at 9:04am |
|
Be careful friend. I recently tried Tackifire C and it really has none of the spin and speed that Hammond X has. It is very slow and heavy.
|
|
|
|
|
TT_Freak
Platinum Member 
Joined: 11/21/2004 Status: Offline Points: 2672 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/27/2007 at 11:49am |
|
Needs glue, otherwise is even worse than Bryce-unglued.
|
|
|
Violin
F1 Actor 10g at 3 and 9 10g at 12 20g at the end of handle |
|
|
|
|
hubie60
Super Member
Joined: 10/28/2004 Location: Jamaica Status: Offline Points: 224 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/27/2007 at 9:15pm |
|
I tried it glued and unglued - it's no Hammond X.
|
|
|
|
|
Harold
Super Member
Joined: 05/04/2006 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 119 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/27/2007 at 10:23pm |
|
ssiew968: I have tried both rubbers. Hammond X is way faster than Tackifire C. It's way too fast to be considered to of the same category in terms of speed with Tackifire C. Hammond X has low throw but the Tackifire C has a high throw. Tackifire C is very heavy. Tried it once and I wouldn't recommended it to anyone if weight is an issue.
I would however recommend you to get Bryce instead. Bryce is a little slower than Hammond X. But the spin's a little better. I believe the adjustment to Bryce is a lot easier.
IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |
Topic Options