VIOLIN/EXPERT-H/WOLFEED/Speed90Reverse/LaserCarbon

nittaku Rorin is awesome. theses look as if u r going to buy them at iruiru. ask them for the 10mm. its hard to find, mayber 10 usd more expensive, but a much more worth while buy.

ok... I have decided to go for a double sided setup.
and I have narrowed down my list....

- J-Speed 90 Reverse, 8000yen
- Nittaku VIOLIN P-H or R-H, 12000yen
- Nittaku WOLFEED P-H or R-H, (not on iruiru english site)
- Nittaku EXPERT-H, 6240yen
- kokutaku LASER CARBON PRECIOUS ROTARY, 8000yen
- Butterfly CYPRESS-S, 8000yen
- Butterfly SENKOH SUPER 95-S, 4000yen
- Nittaku RORIN, 9600yen
- Nittaku AA, 8000yen
- Nittaku RUSSELFOR9.2, 4480 yen
- Kokutaku SUPER CHO-TOKUSEN BISHU No.1D100, 9600yen
- TSP DYNAM, 8000yen

I suspect thinner blades are better candidates for RBH setup...
what do u think?

speed90 is thicker...8.5mm - I wonder if it is too thick.
Expert-h and WOLFEED P-H are thin and light... but nittaku rate their speed as lower than violin...

Violin is quite costly... I wonder if it is really worth the high value.

kokutaku LASER CARBON PRECIOUS ROTARY is another one....

seems that the above are the top reversible choices

anyone?

- J-Speed 90 Reverse, 8000yen
- Nittaku VIOLIN P-H or R-H, 12000yen
- Nittaku WOLFEED P-H or R-H, (not on iruiru english site)
- Nittaku EXPERT-H, 6240yen
- kokutaku LASER CARBON PRECIOUS ROTARY, 8000yen

Looks like this is the only Nittaku WOLFEED R-H
review online.... after some search

charlesj wrote: saw this blog about violin http://com.martinspin.ch/profiles/blog/show?id=643851%3ABlogPost%3A3421

The speed90 reverse is no good for RPB. The unnecessary amount of cork is annoying. The thickness inhibits what you can do with the ball. You're better off with the Violin Jpen. Just remove the back cork and with two rubbers on the balance will be just about right. You can tweak around with lead as well until it swings just right.

Hi TT_freak,

and I saw that you are using this combi
Violin
F1
Actor

What's the weight of your blade and also the overall weight?
How's F1 and Actor?
I may be considering actor as my back rubber if it is light and powerful enough.

My whole bat weights 200g. For the past few months I've been experimenting with lead weights place in strategic positions on the bat to modify the balance and swing weight. A heavier bat deforms the ball more to create more spin, lets you get away with less racquet head speed once you're away from the table, has a bigger sweetspot and is much better for defensive shots.

Moreover, by changing the position of the lead you can change the properties of the racquet (namely how fast the blade swings and how much spin the bat can produce). There are two different ways of weighting your bat. A polarised setup has a large amount of weight at the extremities of the major axis. A depolarised setup has most of the weight on the minor axis in the middle of the bat. My bat is highly polarised to increase the swing weight and the bat's ability to deflect at contact. In other words I can hit harder with more spin. A depolarised bat will be heavier but swing lighter and produce less spin as it tends to deflect less.

Every bat can be as fast as you want depending on how much you can handle the increase in weight. My fastest ever blade weighted 130g and was a 7ply wood.

You tweak the weight to achieve the right balance. Lets say your backhand rubber is significantly lighter than your forehand rubber. It will swing slower on your backhand and faster on your forehand. That is a result of a destabilised centre of mass. You'll want to stick the lead more on the backhand side to shift the centre of mass back to centerline.

As for the Violin, its a old school blade. Don't expect it to be fast unmodified. But the feel is fantastic if you're used to those sort of blades in the first place. You can modify the cork to your liking. But personally I don't like the feel of cork at all and would rather rip out most of the cork.

found!

Butterfly Paradox-R

http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.liberott.com%2Ftype6%2Fitem%2Fshowitem.php%3Fcar%3D63%26cate_no%3D63%26item_no%3D519%26cha%3D&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sl=ko&tl=en

It's an Arylate-Carbon.

Anyway, I think Arylate-Carbon should be same as Nittaku G-Carbon.

But I think this type of glass fibre carbon blades should be weaker than just carbon blades.

What do you think? I just got a chance to bounce a ball on the blade itself. Rather not so bouncy! Only a few bounce and the ball would come to a nice rest. Looks like a lot of vibration and power is absorbed into the blade.

charlesj wrote: Is there a butterfly reversible blade?