tsp hino-carbon power vs stiga clipper

thinking of getting one jsut to keep my old clipper wood safe even though its a very sturdy blade.

plus you get a better feel for the ball especially with all wood blades, carbon seems to deaden the feel for the ball..

there is an unwritten rule, which really should be a rule full stop.

"When in doubt Clipper Wood"

this isn't a problem... i have good technical basis... i learned to play table tennis at same time, with same coaches of paula medina (the best colombian table tennis player of all times)... i don't have problem with fast equipment, in fact before i stopped to play in 2007, i used a very speedy arylate/carbon blade (bty iolite)... i could use and play well with a bty primorac carbon, schlager carbon or sardius but the problem with those blades is that aren't suitables with chinese rubbers because are too much stiff and hard... with too little dwell time... so now when i returned to trainings and participated in university championships i want a blade faster, with less vibrations and a little better for short pips than my h-wl but also suitable for my fh dhs rubber

thanks, yes i also thought that with a baby she may have less time for train and a fast equipment require more time of training because need more control in the hands, i didn't know that she change spectol 21 for haifu dolphin (or maybe penguin)... 

does you have played or tested the hino-carbon? can you compare hino-carbon with other blades that you have played? i like to know about the speed/control ratio, the touch (vibrations) and how feel it in the hand during various situations that may arise in a match, because sometimes the manufacturers descriptions are not 100% reliable

of course!! 

players like ma long or zhang jike have differents needs to amateur or lower level players

even between the chinese team every player have specific needs! for example zhang jike need a more controled rubber (h3) because play more close to the table and ma long need more dynamical and powerful rubber (tg3)

my problem is that the difference between my old h2 with speed glue in a iolite to my actual h3 neo in a h-wl is to consider, when i play with good players (for example 3 played in the 3rd and after in the 2nd division of german league in the last years, other in the 2nd division of portugal league) that use very fast blades (timo boll alc and other use timo boll zlc) with tenergys, in the rallies i feel my attacks haven't the enough power, even some of them (that they were my training partners) told me that my equipment don't have the enough power... this is the reason because i'm searching faster blade than my actual h-wl... thence the clippers not convinced me, i know the great control, quality,  etc etc... but i prefer expand my options... if finally i couldn't find other good option  maybe i'll think in a hybrid wood, clipper cc or tube carbo

if you want it to go faster.. then hit/spin harder

My review of the Hino-carbon would be. OFF+ reasonable dwell for an OFF+ blade because it's got a thick layer of hinoki on top, stiff. That's about it, it's the same as the Butterfly hinoki carbon blades, Like Sardius, Schlager, Primorac carbon, Gergely, it might work well with short pips but the pips side would have to out weigh it not being ideal on the inverted side. Your pips hitting would be rocket fast with the hino carbon and if you can control it then that's great, it just wont loop very well

what do you think about the clipper cc?? how much differs from other clippers??