|
|
Rubbers for my new blade? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
ChaserHUN
Member Joined: 09/13/2014 Location: Hungary Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 08/12/2015 at 12:37am |
Hey!
I've been playing a Butterfly Grubba Carbon All+ with Butterfly Sriver FX 2,1mm on FH and Speedy PO 1,9mm on BH. I felt it pretty slow so I bought a JOOLA K7, tried it before and it's pretty awesome. I play mostly topspins on FH and hitting/blocking on BH, first ball topspin than hit, hit, hit on BH. Sometimes I felt I could use a tiny bit more grip on BH so thought I try a Raystorm.The speedy po is pretty awesome as well, my opponents said it's harder and more frustrating to do topspins against it thant an inverted. Also I don't know if I use 1,9mm or 2,1mm So my questions: What difference would 1,9mm make on FH(using sriver fx) compared to 2,1mm? What difference would 2,1mm make on BH (using speedy po, or raystorm) compared to 1,9mm? Should I stay with the speedy po or try a raystorm? I want to have the same speed on BH than on FH, but not as much speed. |
|
Sponsored Links | |
ChaserHUN
Member Joined: 09/13/2014 Location: Hungary Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Someone?
|
|
frogger
Premier Member Joined: 08/03/2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3062 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
There is no firm rule but 1.9 favors players who play close to table. 2.1 will gain you a tic more spin and speed but will also add weight. |
|
Wood Paddle
Red side Black side. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |