Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - which hardbat rubber....
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

which hardbat rubber....

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
tuco View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 06/11/2007
Location: ValleyOfTheSun
Status: Offline
Points: 1432
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tuco Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: which hardbat rubber....
    Posted: 05/04/2016 at 12:52pm
of all the legal hardbat rubbers, which one is the easiest to produce spin?
The Dark Side is:
"Quicker, easier, more seductive" - Yoda


Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
wturber View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/28/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3899
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wturber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/04/2016 at 12:58pm
Originally posted by tuco tuco wrote:

of all the legal hardbat rubbers, which one is the easiest to produce spin?

 
Probably one of the Yasaka rubbers.  Next might be Butterfly Orthodox.  But none of them has a huge spin advantage.  That's part of the point of the approval process.  They will feel substantially different in how they play though.

Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX
Back to Top
tuco View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 06/11/2007
Location: ValleyOfTheSun
Status: Offline
Points: 1432
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tuco Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/04/2016 at 1:10pm
thanks, Jay.  Looks like the Yasaka A-1-2 comes in 2 versions : large and small pips. (http://iruiru.com/goods_page.php?ct=A&mk=C&gd=AC030)

are both versions hardbat approved?  I don't suppose I can have large pips on one side and small pips on another? Evil Smile
The Dark Side is:
"Quicker, easier, more seductive" - Yoda


Back to Top
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/04/2016 at 2:12pm
I think a legal hardbat has to have the same surface on both sides, but WTurber can clear this up.

BTW classique, a rubber originally designed by WTurber for hardbat, has been approved by the hardbat committee and is added to the list. I don't think it's the spinniest approved rubber though.


Edited by cole_ely - 05/04/2016 at 2:13pm
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
IanMcg View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 05/27/2011
Location: Somehere
Status: Offline
Points: 1151
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote IanMcg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/04/2016 at 3:16pm
Originally posted by tuco tuco wrote:

thanks, Jay.  Looks like the Yasaka A-1-2 comes in 2 versions : large and small pips. (http://iruiru.com/goods_page.php?ct=A&mk=C&gd=AC030)

are both versions hardbat approved?  I don't suppose I can have large pips on one side and small pips on another? Evil Smile
Both should be approved. I believe that both sides do have to be the same to be legal in a hardbat event, but for regular ITTF/USATT play I think you can have different rubbers on both sides.

Butterfly Orthodox is pretty spinney, and I've heard that YASAKA Cobalt (and variations) are also pretty spinney.
Back to Top
wturber View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/28/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3899
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wturber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/04/2016 at 3:28pm
Originally posted by tuco tuco wrote:

thanks, Jay.  Looks like the Yasaka A-1-2 comes in 2 versions : large and small pips. (http://iruiru.com/goods_page.php?ct=A&mk=C&gd=AC030)

are both versions hardbat approved?  I don't suppose I can have large pips on one side and small pips on another? Evil Smile

I believe both are hardbat approved.

Here's a link to the official list (which apparently may be slightly out of date.)

As for large and small pips, the answer is, "No."  

Fundamental to the notion of classic hardbat is not having a combination racket.  We used to have a two-color waiver allowing hardbats as defined by the USATT Hardbat Committee (now Classic Table Tennis Committee) to be used in USATT events without complying with the two-color rule.  It was justified largely on the notion that nobody should care given that the hardbat rules required the same exact rubber on both sides.  The two-color rule has no purpose if both sides are the same rubber.  In fact, it is perfectly OK to have both sides the same color in hardbat events precisely because the same rubber is required on both sides.

Cole just mentioned Classique.  I understood that Classique was being tested, but did not know that it had been approved.  I'd like to clarify my involvement with this rubber.  Yes, I initiated the project and was involved in the design of Classique and a sister product, Golden Era.  The idea was to produce a rubber that met ITTF requirements but still played very much like classic Leyland rubber and to also produce a rubber that threw out ITTF pip size and spacing requirements and would mimic classic Leyland rubber very closely.  

The rubbers never reached a level of development that met my goals.  I was never happy with what I considered to be an overly intrusive label size (smaller is better for hardbat), and the fellow I was working with was not putting much effort into the Golden Era rubber which was actually more important to me.  There were also some other issues.  In the end, I dropped my participation in the development.  

My understanding is that Classique has gone through some changes in rubber formulation since my involvement.  So I don't really know much about how it plays right now.  But if it has been approved, then it probably plays at least OK and maybe is quite good.  I just don't know.  I'll have to order a few sheets from Cole and try it out.  


Edited by wturber - 05/04/2016 at 3:38pm
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX
Back to Top
wturber View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/28/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3899
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wturber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/04/2016 at 3:36pm
Originally posted by tuco tuco wrote:

of all the legal hardbat rubbers, which one is the easiest to produce spin?

BTW, remember that the blade must be all wood.

Your location sez "Valley of the Sun" - is that the Phoenix area or a different Valley of the Sun?
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX
Back to Top
berndt_mann View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 02/02/2015
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 1719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote berndt_mann Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/04/2016 at 3:52pm
Your informative post, Jay, makes much of what I was going to write in a post largely unnecessary.  As far as the OP's question about which permissible hard rubbers most easily produce spin, I would suggest Yasaka Cobalt and Yasaka Cobalt Alpha.  For hard rubbers, they are rather heavy, but both are I believe cloth backed, which makes them easier to affix to a blade and in my subjective opinion more amenable to producing spin than hard rubbers which don't have a cloth backing.

Valor Premier hard rubber, which comes both with and without a cloth backing and can fit oversize vintage and modern blades made for hard rubber play, may also be a good permissible spin producing hard rubber.  I can't say so personally, as I've never played with Valor Premier.

Let us hope, Jay and fellow hard rubber lovers, that the newly approved Classique plays as you write "at least OK" and better yet in a manner that would make the dwindling number of us Leyland users say "in a few dozen years once my Leyland craps out, I gotta try some of this stuff".


bmann1942
Setup: Mark Bellamy Master Craftsman blade, British Leyland hard rubber
Back to Top
frogger View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 08/03/2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3062
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote frogger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/05/2016 at 5:01pm

I have used BTY OX and Yasaka A-1-2 for years on different blades. I have found the BTY OX has a bit softer pip that produced a tic more spin than A-1-2. Actually I believe the blade with the most dwell time will produce the better spin but even this is subjective to some. Valor is very good but expensive. Valor is good for covering very large headed blades.
Wood Paddle
Red side
Black side.


Back to Top
gnopgnipster View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 07/22/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 877
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gnopgnipster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/05/2016 at 8:16pm
About the Classique... Jay how come you did not get a sheet for testing? Under the old rules passed by my administration, all members of the Hardbat Committee were supposed to get a sheet, test it, and then vote on it.

CHEERS!
Hardbat: Valor Champion/FH/BH-Valor Premier-OX

Regular:Valor Big Stick FH-Apollo II & BH-Globe 979 OX

Back to Top
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/05/2016 at 9:04pm
Originally posted by wturber wturber wrote:

Originally posted by tuco tuco wrote:

thanks, Jay.  Looks like the Yasaka A-1-2 comes in 2 versions : large and small pips. (http://iruiru.com/goods_page.php?ct=A&mk=C&gd=AC030)

are both versions hardbat approved?  I don't suppose I can have large pips on one side and small pips on another? Evil Smile


I believe both are hardbat approved.

Here's a link to the official list (which apparently may be slightly out of date.)

As for large and small pips, the answer is, "No."  

Fundamental to the notion of classic hardbat is not having a combination racket.  We used to have a two-color waiver allowing hardbats as defined by the USATT Hardbat Committee (now Classic Table Tennis Committee) to be used in USATT events without complying with the two-color rule.  It was justified largely on the notion that nobody should care given that the hardbat rules required the same exact rubber on both sides.  The two-color rule has no purpose if both sides are the same rubber.  In fact, it is perfectly OK to have both sides the same color in hardbat events precisely because the same rubber is required on both sides.

Cole just mentioned Classique.  I understood that Classique was being tested, but did not know that it had been approved.  I'd like to clarify my involvement with this rubber.  Yes, I initiated the project and was involved in the design of Classique and a sister product, Golden Era.  The idea was to produce a rubber that met ITTF requirements but still played very much like classic Leyland rubber and to also produce a rubber that threw out ITTF pip size and spacing requirements and would mimic classic Leyland rubber very closely.  

The rubbers never reached a level of development that met my goals.  I was never happy with what I considered to be an overly intrusive label size (smaller is better for hardbat), and the fellow I was working with was not putting much effort into the Golden Era rubber which was actually more important to me.  There were also some other issues.  In the end, I dropped my participation in the development.  

My understanding is that Classique has gone through some changes in rubber formulation since my involvement.  So I don't really know much about how it plays right now.  But if it has been approved, then it probably plays at least OK and maybe is quite good.  I just don't know.  I'll have to order a few sheets from Cole and try it out.  



Sorry to misrepresent the situation. I figured it would come up and you were in the thread so...

They did mess with some alternate versions but I bet you'll find this plays like you expect.
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/05/2016 at 9:05pm
They only made a handful of those lp kind and that years ago. They're actually selling well in China as this formulation and there's no plans to change.

So sorry to hijack
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
gnopgnipster View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 07/22/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 877
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gnopgnipster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/06/2016 at 9:14am
Originally posted by tuco tuco wrote:

of all the legal hardbat rubbers, which one is the easiest to produce spin?
During my tenure as chairman of the Hardbat Committee we judged hardbat rubbers using BTY Orthodox as the fastest and Leyland as the slowest. Spin also had to fall between those two. These were the same guidelines that were used before me. As you can see there is not much difference and all the rubbers are very similar. The founders of the hardbat committee wanted it that way.

On a personal note Valor Premier might be one of the most expensive on the list but you get what you pay for. It is made in England to exacting quality control standards and you will never hear that the rubber was reformulated, or that it doesn't play like it used to, or that it has a long pips and a short pips version. The rubber is a best selling product which means I sell them quickly allowing me to make fresh batches of the rubber often, unlike competitors which sit on shelfs around the globe indefinitely. When is the last time you heard that Butterfly Orthodox or Yasaka won a major Hardbat Championship in the USA?

Oh well... CHEERS! 
Hardbat: Valor Champion/FH/BH-Valor Premier-OX

Regular:Valor Big Stick FH-Apollo II & BH-Globe 979 OX

Back to Top
kolevtt View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 06/13/2011
Location: European Union
Status: Offline
Points: 2577
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kolevtt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/06/2016 at 11:40am
Anyone tested Spinlord Waran OX for hardbat?
These pips have outstanding performance in spin and good speed too.

Back to Top
wturber View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/28/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3899
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wturber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/06/2016 at 4:42pm
Originally posted by kolevtt kolevtt wrote:

Anyone tested Spinlord Waran OX for hardbat?
These pips have outstanding performance in spin and good speed too.


Which would probably be two good reasons why the USATT Classic Table Tennis Committee probably wouldn't approve them.

But that might be a good choice for areas where the hardbat rubber isn't as limited and/or for hardbat players who use hardbat when playing in non-hardbat events.
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX
Back to Top
wturber View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/28/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3899
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wturber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/06/2016 at 4:46pm
Originally posted by cole_ely cole_ely wrote:

 
Sorry to misrepresent the situation. I figured it would come up and you were in the thread so...

They did mess with some alternate versions but I bet you'll find this plays like you expect.

No problem.  I didn't take your post as a misrepresentation.  But I figured it could easily lead to assumptions that would no be correct.  So I figured this would be a good place to clarify things.
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX
Back to Top
wturber View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/28/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3899
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wturber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/06/2016 at 5:14pm
Originally posted by gnopgnipster gnopgnipster wrote:

About the Classique... Jay how come you did not get a sheet for testing? Under the old rules passed by my administration, all members of the Hardbat Committee were supposed to get a sheet, test it, and then vote on it.

CHEERS!

I'm not aware from any official source that it has actually been approved yet.  It could be that distributing the rubber to committee members is the next step that Scott intends to take assuming the rubber passes the objective testing phase. I know that Scott has been very busy with a number of things and simply may not have reached that point yet.

But frankly, if I do receive a sheet for testing I'll recuse myself from input given that I had an interest and involvement in the rubber in the past.  
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX
Back to Top
berndt_mann View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 02/02/2015
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 1719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote berndt_mann Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/06/2016 at 6:43pm
Originally posted by wturber wturber wrote:

Originally posted by kolevtt kolevtt wrote:

Anyone tested Spinlord Waran OX for hardbat?
These pips have outstanding performance in spin and good speed too.


Which would probably be two good reasons why the USATT Classic Table Tennis Committee probably wouldn't approve them.

But that might be a good choice for areas where the hardbat rubber isn't as limited and/or for hardbat players who use hardbat when playing in non-hardbat events.

A good point.  If you are one of the few, the proud, the brave who uses a hardbat when playing in sponge events it might be advisable to use the spinniest, speediest OX short pips you can get a hold of.  In sponge events, you may use two different rubbers on your hardbat (red and black) and you may also use a composite blade.


Edited by berndt_mann - 05/06/2016 at 6:43pm
bmann1942
Setup: Mark Bellamy Master Craftsman blade, British Leyland hard rubber
Back to Top
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/06/2016 at 10:21pm
Originally posted by wturber wturber wrote:

Originally posted by gnopgnipster gnopgnipster wrote:

About the Classique... Jay how come you did not get a sheet for testing? Under the old rules passed by my administration, all members of the Hardbat Committee were supposed to get a sheet, test it, and then vote on it.

CHEERS!


I'm not aware from any official source that it has actually been approved yet.  It could be that distributing the rubber to committee members is the next step that Scott intends to take assuming the rubber passes the objective testing phase. I know that Scott has been very busy with a number of things and simply may not have reached that point yet.

But frankly, if I do receive a sheet for testing I'll recuse myself from input given that I had an interest and involvement in the rubber in the past.  


It's done. Scott called me.
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
gnopgnipster View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 07/22/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 877
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gnopgnipster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/07/2016 at 9:11am
Is Scott Gordon in charge of approving the new hardbat rubbers by himself? Without the other members of the committee testing them also? Sounds like there is room for corruption in such a system if in fact that is what the system has become. 

Jay you said you would recuse yourself, but you also said the Classique rubber was different from when you were involved with it. Sounds to me like the more reason to want to test it, unless of course you had a financial interest in the rubber in which case recusing yourself would be correct. Curiously though was Scott also involved like you in the development of the rubber? 
Hardbat: Valor Champion/FH/BH-Valor Premier-OX

Regular:Valor Big Stick FH-Apollo II & BH-Globe 979 OX

Back to Top
gnopgnipster View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 07/22/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 877
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gnopgnipster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/07/2016 at 9:20am
Cole aren't you jumping the gun a little by posting this on your website?  *CLASSIQUE IS NOW ON THE OFFICIAL USATT HARDBAT LIST OF APPROVED RUBBERS* I just checked and the rubber was not listed. Also doesn't the USATT Board of directors have to approve the rubber? While I realize that they are usually a rubber stamp, they still have to approve it before it becomes official...
Hardbat: Valor Champion/FH/BH-Valor Premier-OX

Regular:Valor Big Stick FH-Apollo II & BH-Globe 979 OX

Back to Top
wturber View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/28/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3899
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wturber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/07/2016 at 12:39pm
Originally posted by gnopgnipster gnopgnipster wrote:

Is Scott Gordon in charge of approving the new hardbat rubbers by himself? Without the other members of the committee testing them also? Sounds like there is room for corruption in such a system if in fact that is what the system has become. 

Jay you said you would recuse yourself, but you also said the Classique rubber was different from when you were involved with it. Sounds to me like the more reason to want to test it, unless of course you had a financial interest in the rubber in which case recusing yourself would be correct. Curiously though was Scott also involved like you in the development of the rubber? 

The notion that anyone should be concerned about corruption with Scott testing hardbat rubber is a ridiculous flight of fantasy.  With the single exception of Valor rubber, which was  the single rubber approved under your chairmanship of the committee, the testing of hardbat rubbers and subsequent recommendation for approval or not was done by Scott Gordon and Al Papp and a vote by the committee.  I think that's the same process by which Magic Pips was dropped when the formulation was changed.  It's the process that gave us our current list (excepting Valor) which you seem to agree offers rubbers with very little variation in degree of spin.  It seems like the method has been quite successful in meeting its goals.

Further, Scott has put a huge amount of personal time and effort into the advocacy of hardbat and the resurrection/preservation of the classic game.  Like me, I'm sure he is at a substantial net financial loss from his involvement and advocacy of hardbat and table tennis. Neither his nor my interests have ever been financial in this area.  When I discussed developing this rubber with my wife, I made it clear that breaking even on sales vs. development costs would be unlikely. 

There is nothing curious about Scott's non-existent involvement in the development of Classique.  What is curious is why you would even ask the question to begin with.  Given what I posted earlier about my involvement, do you really think I'd hide information about anybody else on the committee or within USATT who was financially involved?  Especially the current committee chair and someone with high hardbat visibility like Scott? Really?  

I did specifically bring up the issue of past formulation changes with Scott when I found out that Classique had been submitted for testing.  My understanding is that the formulation issue was discussed with Cole (who, I believe, imports, but is not involved in the making of the rubber.) Cole's input was that the formulation has been stabile and is expected to remain so.  Cole has an excellent reputation for integrity and fair dealings through colestt.com and I have no doubt that he would be among the first to notice a change and to let someone on the Classic Table Tennis Committee know.

As for Cole's reporting of the rubber being approved, that is probably largely a matter of semantics and different understandings about what "approved" meant.  It is not technically approved until the committee votes on it. Scott anticipated that the vote would occur shortly after his discussion with Cole,  and that the committee in all likelihood would approve the rubber.  But the vote hasn't happened yet due to interfering events in Scott's personal life. 

Based on Cole's conversation with Scott, it is understandable that Cole came away understanding that the rubber had been approved even though technically that hasn't quite yet happened but probably will shortly.






Edited by wturber - 05/07/2016 at 12:41pm
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX
Back to Top
wturber View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/28/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3899
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wturber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/07/2016 at 12:43pm
Originally posted by wturber wturber wrote:

Originally posted by gnopgnipster gnopgnipster wrote:

Is Scott Gordon in charge of approving the new hardbat rubbers by himself? Without the other members of the committee testing them also? Sounds like there is room for corruption in such a system if in fact that is what the system has become. 

Jay you said you would recuse yourself, but you also said the Classique rubber was different from when you were involved with it. Sounds to me like the more reason to want to test it, unless of course you had a financial interest in the rubber in which case recusing yourself would be correct. Curiously though was Scott also involved like you in the development of the rubber? 

The notion that anyone should be concerned about corruption with Scott testing hardbat rubber is a ridiculous flight of fantasy.  With the single exception of Valor rubber, which was  the single rubber approved under your chairmanship of the committee, the testing of hardbat rubbers and subsequent recommendation for approval or not was done by Scott Gordon and Al Papp and a vote by the committee.  I think that's the same process by which Magic Pips was dropped when the formulation was changed.  It's the process that gave us our current list (excepting Valor) which you seem to agree offers rubbers with very little variation in degree of spin.  It seems like the method has been quite successful in meeting its goals.

Further, Scott has put a huge amount of personal time and effort into the advocacy of hardbat and the resurrection/preservation of the classic game.  Like me, I'm sure he is at a substantial net financial loss from his involvement and advocacy of hardbat and table tennis. Neither his nor my interests have ever been financial in this area.  When I discussed developing this rubber with my wife, I made it clear that breaking even on sales vs. development costs would be unlikely. Suggesting possible corruption is downright silly. 

There is nothing curious about Scott's non-existent involvement in the development of Classique.  What is curious is why you would even ask the question to begin with.  Given what I posted earlier about my involvement, do you really think I'd hide information about anybody else on the committee or within USATT who was financially involved?  Especially the current committee chair and someone with high hardbat visibility like Scott? Really?  

I did specifically bring up the issue of past formulation changes with Scott when I found out that Classique had been submitted for testing.  My understanding is that the formulation issue was discussed with Cole (who, I believe, imports, but is not involved in the making of the rubber.) Cole's input was that the formulation has been stabile and is expected to remain so.  Cole has an excellent reputation for integrity and fair dealings through colestt.com and I have no doubt that he would be among the first to notice a change and to let someone on the Classic Table Tennis Committee know.

As for Cole's reporting of the rubber being approved, that is probably largely a matter of semantics and different understandings about what "approved" meant.  It is not technically approved until the committee votes on it. Scott anticipated that the vote would occur shortly after his discussion with Cole,  and that the committee in all likelihood would approve the rubber.  But the vote hasn't happened yet due to interfering events in Scott's personal life. 

Based on Cole's conversation with Scott, it is understandable that Cole came away understanding that the rubber had been approved even though technically that hasn't quite yet happened but probably will shortly.




Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX
Back to Top
wturber View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/28/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3899
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wturber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/07/2016 at 12:48pm
Originally posted by cole_ely cole_ely wrote:



It's done. Scott called me.

When I told Scott that I thought maybe you jumped the gun a bit, he said that he didn't think so and that he had given you every reason to believe that approval was imminent.

None of this is any big deal.  It's just a timing problem because things haven't happened as soon as anticipated.
Jay Turberville
www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist w/ Dr. Evil or Friendship 802-40 OX
Back to Top
gnopgnipster View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 07/22/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 877
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gnopgnipster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05/07/2016 at 2:46pm
Originally posted by wturber wturber wrote:

Originally posted by wturber wturber wrote:

Originally posted by gnopgnipster gnopgnipster wrote:

Is Scott Gordon in charge of approving the new hardbat rubbers by himself? Without the other members of the committee testing them also? Sounds like there is room for corruption in such a system if in fact that is what the system has become. 

Jay you said you would recuse yourself, but you also said the Classique rubber was different from when you were involved with it. Sounds to me like the more reason to want to test it, unless of course you had a financial interest in the rubber in which case recusing yourself would be correct. Curiously though was Scott also involved like you in the development of the rubber? 

The notion that anyone should be concerned about corruption with Scott testing hardbat rubber is a ridiculous flight of fantasy.  With the single exception of Valor rubber, which was  the single rubber approved under your chairmanship of the committee (WRONG! DR EVIL AND GAMBLER PEACEKEEPER were approved under my administration), the testing of hardbat rubbers and subsequent recommendation for approval or not was done by Scott Gordon and Al Papp and a vote by the committee (I always sent a sheet of rubber to every member of the committee for testing and them we voted).  I think that's the same process by which Magic Pips was dropped when the formulation was changed.  It's the process that gave us our current list (excepting Valor) (wrong again)which you seem to agree offers rubbers with very little variation in degree of spin.  It seems like the method has been quite successful in meeting its goals.

Further, Scott has put a huge amount of personal time and effort into the advocacy of hardbat and the resurrection/preservation of the classic game.  Like me, I'm sure he is at a substantial net financial loss from his involvement and advocacy of hardbat and table tennis. Neither his nor my interests have ever been financial in this area (so you say...).  When I discussed developing this rubber with my wife, I made it clear that breaking even on sales vs. development costs would be unlikely (Bernie Sanders economics what about long term sales profits) suggesting possible corruption is downright silly (if Scott Gordon can say I had a conflict of interest in Valor, even though I did not participate in the voting, why can I ask if you, and Scott, and other members of the Hardbat Committee also have a conflict of interest with Air Classique and other rubbers?)

There is nothing curious about Scott's non-existent involvement in the development of Classique.  What is curious is why you would even ask the question to begin with.  Given what I posted earlier about my involvement, do you really think I'd hide information about anybody else on the committee or within USATT who was financially involved? (Nothing has been posted about the Hardbat Committee and its doings. So I am asking)  Especially the current committee chair and someone with high hardbat visibility like Scott? Really? Why are you so defensive? Scott threw me under the bus when he knew it was not true about my having a conflict of interest with Valor Table Tennis. Yet he never threw Marty Reisman and others under the bus when Reisman was selling hardbat equipment and promoting it at the same time he was on the Committee approving that equipment.

I did specifically bring up the issue of past formulation changes with Scott when I found out that Classique had been submitted for testing.  My understanding is that the formulation issue was discussed with Cole (who, I believe, imports, but is not involved in the making of the rubber.) Cole's input was that the formulation has been stabile and is expected to remain so.  Cole has an excellent reputation for integrity and fair dealings through colestt.com and I have no doubt that he would be among the first to notice a change and to let someone on the Classic Table Tennis Committee know (I was approached on several occasions by individuals asking to approve different rubbers for hardbat. My position on that was that I wanted proof first that they represented the manufacturer and that the manufacturer wanted the rubber approved for hardbat. Just curious, is Cole the official representative of the manufacturer and does the manufacturer want to have the rubber approved for hardbat? If the manufacturer does not want the rubber approved I can see a lawsuit by them against USATT...

As for Cole's reporting of the rubber being approved, that is probably largely a matter of semantics and different understandings about what "approved" meant.  It is not technically approved until the committee votes on it (So you [and the rest of the committee] will rubber-stamp Scott's decision without your personal knowledge of the product and say that whatever Scott says is true without verification?). Scott anticipated that the vote would occur shortly after his discussion with Cole,  and that the committee in all likelihood would approve the rubber.  But the vote hasn't happened yet due to interfering events in Scott's personal life (Yes I am very familiar with those)

Based on Cole's conversation with Scott, it is understandable that Cole came away understanding that the rubber had been approved even though technically that hasn't quite yet happened but probably will shortly. WOW!







Edited by gnopgnipster - 05/07/2016 at 2:48pm
Hardbat: Valor Champion/FH/BH-Valor Premier-OX

Regular:Valor Big Stick FH-Apollo II & BH-Globe 979 OX

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 1.266 seconds.

Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Web Wiz News
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer

MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd.

Copyright ©2003-2024 Alex Table Tennis Ltd. All rights reserved.