Print Page | Close Window

Tibhar Sigma Sensitec Blade Review

Printed From: Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET
Category: Equipment
Forum Name: Equipment
Forum Description: Share your experience and discussions about table tennis equipments.
Moderator: haggisv
Assistant Moderators: position available

URL: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50778
Printed Date: 05/06/2024 at 3:59pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Tibhar Sigma Sensitec Blade Review
Posted By: yogi_bear
Subject: Tibhar Sigma Sensitec Blade Review
Date Posted: 06/06/2012 at 9:08pm
i've longed to review this blade because seeing at the pictures online it looked beautiful. A lot of people are first attracted to the blade's looks and its a common thing. I was however more interested in how it plays. 


Weight: 92 grams
Plies: 5 (outer is definitely koto, i can't see the inner layers because it has a side covered by a layer of wood around the blade head.)
Thickness: 6.9mm-7.0mm (yes its thick)
Size: 151x155mm
Rubbers used: Tibhar Aurus Soft and Tibhar 5Q
Speed: OFF


The blade is a finely crafted all wood blade. Basing on its looks and finish it looks like it came from the same factory that made the Black devil and Epox blades. The blade is colored black but the outer ply because of its minute squarish design on its grain is obviously koto. It has a different design because there is no continuity of the blade head going to the handle. Instead of constructed as one piece made up of many layers, it is composed of several parts that interrupts the continuity of the wood. The handle is a bit thicker than other Tibhar blades which i like because i have big hands. The handle is about 1.5-1.9mm thicker than its brothers.


the good:

very solid feel - hitting and driving the balls produce solid shots. it gives a semi hard feeling and you can feel the power on your strokes. it has average dwell time for a blade though i still felt the ball sink a little into the sponge when I used both the 5Q ans Aurus Soft. 

Smashing - a very good smasher's blade with good accuracy and control. I would rate its speed as slightly lesser than a mazunov by about 10% but nevertheless still very fast. I doesn't feel as stiff as other attacking blades and it has less vibration.

loop drives - its very good on loop drives due to its solid feel and presents a low arced loop drive hitting the ball off the bounce. I would rate it above average on slow spinny loops. I think this is not a pure looping blade.

Blocking and counters - very good for both. The passive blocks and punch blocks are very controllable. Countering gives ample speed and control. This blade is built close to the table up to mid distance.

cons:

Weight - a bit heavy for some people. It needs to be paired with a lighter rubber on one side. 


Conclusion:

Overall a very good compact attacking blade. A well balanced blade on attacking and defensive capabilities. I rate this as a likely 8.5/10 blade. I recommend this to players who wants a blade that gives solid shots on their strokes with a balance on control. Particularly made for intermediate and advanced players.


-------------
Independent online TT Product reviewer of XIOM, STIGA, JOOLA, SANWEI, GEWO, AIR, ITC, APEX, YASAKA and ABROS

ITTF Level 1 Coaching Course Conductor, ITTF Level 1 Coach



Replies:
Posted By: riker71
Date Posted: 06/07/2012 at 12:12am
thank for the review, for a compact head size blade 92g is definitely heavy! The Stratus Powerwood I use has a thick comfy FL handle and is a regular size head. Most other Tibhar blades seem to have the compact head size.

-------------
Stratus Powerwood
FH T05
BH T25


Posted By: winterdrops
Date Posted: 06/07/2012 at 3:46am
Hi Yogi Bear. Thanks for review. I used Sigma Sensitec for 9 moths. Because of no responses and feedback vibrations of blade, I sold it. It is rigth for the Sigma Sensitec is not pure looping blade. I realised this changed it with Stiga Clipper CR WRB.
 
I like the feeling of Clipper. But I wish to know that which blade has a long dwell time and you suggest for pure looping? And Clipper Cr Wrb is a suitable one for poor looping. Or I am still using wrong blade? Thank you for help already.


Posted By: igszoctan
Date Posted: 06/07/2012 at 3:12pm
Originally posted by riker71 riker71 wrote:

thank for the review, for a compact head size blade 92g is definitely heavy! The Stratus Powerwood I use has a thick comfy FL handle and is a regular size head. Most other Tibhar blades seem to have the compact head size.

Sorry for my stupidity but what is the difference between compact and regular head size? 
By the way I can't help falling in love these blades, they look wonderful. I guess I'll sell my belongings and buy one of them at least. Thx for the excellent review again Yogi. I am frozen.


-------------
igszoctan
Fh: Rasant PowerGrip (2.1)
Blades: Appelgren Allplay
Bh: Rasant Powersponge(1.9)
Feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=66928&PID=807706󅌚
Strength and honour


Posted By: Brainstorm69
Date Posted: 06/07/2012 at 5:04pm
In this case, the compact head size is 151x155mm.  Regular blade head size is more like 151(w)x159(h)


Posted By: igszoctan
Date Posted: 06/08/2012 at 12:45am
Thank You Brainstorm. I really appreciate.

-------------
igszoctan
Fh: Rasant PowerGrip (2.1)
Blades: Appelgren Allplay
Bh: Rasant Powersponge(1.9)
Feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=66928&PID=807706󅌚
Strength and honour


Posted By: golfnumeric
Date Posted: 06/12/2012 at 8:31am
Wowww! I've been looking for the review for this blade for almost a year. Thanks a lot, yogi_bear!

Have you ever played with Donic Burn Off- or Donic Epox Offensiv? I've been using either of them for a long time, and I must say I really love them.

Can you please compare the Sigma Sensitec to the mentioned blades? I just want to know if Sigma Sensitec played in comparison to Burn Off- or Epox Offensiv.

Thank you


Posted By: yogi_bear
Date Posted: 06/12/2012 at 7:36pm
Originally posted by golfnumeric golfnumeric wrote:

Wowww! I've been looking for the review for this blade for almost a year. Thanks a lot, yogi_bear!

Have you ever played with Donic Burn Off- or Donic Epox Offensiv? I've been using either of them for a long time, and I must say I really love them.

Can you please compare the Sigma Sensitec to the mentioned blades? I just want to know if Sigma Sensitec played in comparison to Burn Off- or Epox Offensiv.

Thank you

actually i played with a friend's burn off- a few times and owned an epox offensiv in the past. the burn off- has a harder feel than the sigma. i think if i remember it right both the epox and sigma have a koto outerply but the sigma is thicker. both blades looked like were produced under the same factory. the sigma has a thicker handle than the epox but the epox has a wide handle. i think sigma is faster by a notch than the epox offensiv. cant say exactly with the burn off-


-------------
Independent online TT Product reviewer of XIOM, STIGA, JOOLA, SANWEI, GEWO, AIR, ITC, APEX, YASAKA and ABROS

ITTF Level 1 Coaching Course Conductor, ITTF Level 1 Coach


Posted By: golfnumeric
Date Posted: 06/13/2012 at 5:24am
Thanks a lot, yogi_bear!

It surprises me that the Burn off- which is rated as ''off-" is harder than the Sigma, the off blade. From your useful information, I think the Sigma is worth a try. I hope I like it as much as the epox and the burn blades. The softer feel the blade, the more I like.


Posted By: yogi_bear
Date Posted: 06/13/2012 at 9:03am
golf, its because of the harder outer of the burn off- that it feels harder. harder doesn't necessarily fast all the time

-------------
Independent online TT Product reviewer of XIOM, STIGA, JOOLA, SANWEI, GEWO, AIR, ITC, APEX, YASAKA and ABROS

ITTF Level 1 Coaching Course Conductor, ITTF Level 1 Coach


Posted By: Baal
Date Posted: 07/01/2012 at 12:21pm
I haven't seen a separate thread on this, but I recently had a chance to play with a Xeon Sensitec, which is a slower version of the same blade, in the ALL+ - OFF- range I would say.  I would say it is much as Yogi describes the Sigma version, only thinner and slower, more of a loopers blade.  Xeon is also slower than the Stratus Power wood.  Actually, it felt quite similar to the 1985 Stiga offensive classic I have been using lately, which  surprised and impressed me because the blade looks so modern.  Also, let me put in a big thumbs up for Tibhar handles.  A nice size for people with big hands.  People who like allwood blades with great feel should consider this one.


Posted By: yogi_bear
Date Posted: 07/01/2012 at 7:43pm
Baal, don't worry. Tibhar has sent me the xeon and icon sensitec blades plus the texo all+ blade to review. im still waiting for the package to arrive maybe next week together with the new 1Qxd rubbers

-------------
Independent online TT Product reviewer of XIOM, STIGA, JOOLA, SANWEI, GEWO, AIR, ITC, APEX, YASAKA and ABROS

ITTF Level 1 Coaching Course Conductor, ITTF Level 1 Coach


Posted By: golfnumeric
Date Posted: 07/07/2012 at 10:36am
Great! I'm considering buying either sigma or xeon. I do not like a blade that gives a solid feel. I'm looking forward to reading your review on those blades, yogi_bear.

Baal, have u ever tried donic burn off- or epox offensiv? If so, can u please compare xeon with these blades in terms of speed, feel, and sound?

Anyone knows how the the playing differences between a thick and thin blade? I've wasted a lot of money trying many different blades, but I've been disappointed so far.


Posted By: golfnumeric
Date Posted: 07/07/2012 at 10:41am
I notice a big difference in price between sigma and xeon. Are there only differences in speed and thickness? Anyone knows why that is...


Posted By: Baal
Date Posted: 07/07/2012 at 11:40am
Originally posted by golfnumeric golfnumeric wrote:

Great! I'm considering buying either sigma or xeon. I do not like a blade that gives a solid feel. I'm looking forward to reading your review on those blades, yogi_bear.

Baal, have u ever tried donic burn off- or epox offensiv? If so, can u please compare xeon with these blades in terms of speed, feel, and sound?

Anyone knows how the the playing differences between a thick and thin blade? I've wasted a lot of money trying many different blades, but I've been disappointed so far.


Sorry never tried those donic blades.


Posted By: yogi_bear
Date Posted: 07/07/2012 at 8:20pm
i have tried the donic burn off-, it felt harder on impacts than the sigma but slower in speed. the epox offensiv i had it in my collection for 1 yr then gave it to a kid. the sigma is definitely faster and has a harder feel. epox offensiv is a bit flex. good blade though and with a larger blade head

-------------
Independent online TT Product reviewer of XIOM, STIGA, JOOLA, SANWEI, GEWO, AIR, ITC, APEX, YASAKA and ABROS

ITTF Level 1 Coaching Course Conductor, ITTF Level 1 Coach


Posted By: golfnumeric
Date Posted: 08/24/2012 at 2:57pm
I just bought Sigma Sensitec with Sinus Sound on forehand and Nimbus Sound on Backhand. The blade is very stiff, too stiff for my liking. I'm lucky enough that I decided to attach 2 soft rubbers on it so it gives me some feeling. If I put a hard rubber on it, I'm sure I'm gonna hit a ball with a brick!

At first, I'm looking for Xeon Sensitec, but the FL handle is out of stock. The equipment is now on promotion, so most of them are very cheap, meaning that I can't wait for the new arrival of Xeon with FL handle. I bought the blade for let's say 25 US dollars (in Thailand). 

I must admit that the blade is very fast, like yogi_bear said. If it is more flexible, I might like this blade...


Posted By: adishorul
Date Posted: 08/24/2012 at 4:26pm

Give us the shop website 25$ is a very good price for a sensitec blade. Thank you!



Posted By: golfnumeric
Date Posted: 08/24/2012 at 6:20pm
Deleted the link already  Tongue



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net