Print Page | Close Window

Nittaku Lialox

Printed From: Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET
Category: Equipment
Forum Name: Equipment
Forum Description: Share your experience and discussions about table tennis equipments.
Moderator: haggisv
Assistant Moderators: position available

URL: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=68896
Printed Date: 05/05/2024 at 7:07pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Nittaku Lialox
Posted By: bbkon
Subject: Nittaku Lialox
Date Posted: 10/26/2014 at 2:53am

anybody who has experience with this blade?



Replies:
Posted By: Ray
Date Posted: 10/26/2014 at 2:51pm
IMHO, 5wood+2carbon+2aramid and 6.8-6.9mm thick blade is not really tempting.

-------------
Life is too short for defensive play.

https://twitter.com/spinnier_com" rel="nofollow - https://twitter.com/spinnier_com
https://fb.me/spinnier" rel="nofollow - fb.me/spinnier


Posted By: igorigor
Date Posted: 10/26/2014 at 3:34pm
Here are some reviews: 

http://www.tabletennisdb.com/blade/nittaku-lialox.html" rel="nofollow - http://www.tabletennisdb.com/blade/nittaku-lialox.html

  


Posted By: vishal_dindoyal
Date Posted: 10/26/2014 at 4:15pm
The blade is quite thick, rigid, medium hard feel even with limba outerplies, and head heavy! But overall its quite controllable for its speed which is somewhere around that of the butterfly ALCs. Works best with high throw medium hard rubbers that have some catapult since the blade is rigid.


Posted By: bbkon
Date Posted: 10/26/2014 at 9:12pm
Originally posted by vishal_dindoyal vishal_dindoyal wrote:

The blade is quite thick, rigid, medium hard feel even with limba outerplies, and head heavy! But overall its quite controllable for its speed which is somewhere around that of the butterfly ALCs. Works best with high throw medium hard rubbers that have some catapult since the blade is rigid.

how is compared to clipper? i m looking for a replacement for clipper and want to use it with short pips or suggest a replacement under 100$ of a schlagger blade.modern clippers are not solid enough


Posted By: vishal_dindoyal
Date Posted: 10/27/2014 at 12:00am
Compared to clipper it is faster, more solid and more head heavy, thickness is about the same as modern clippers. It plays more like a clipper cc. Have you tried the T-11+? I've heard that is plays well with short pips and it is very light.


Posted By: bbkon
Date Posted: 10/27/2014 at 4:34am
Originally posted by vishal_dindoyal vishal_dindoyal wrote:

Compared to clipper it is faster, more solid and more head heavy, thickness is about the same as modern clippers. It plays more like a clipper cc. Have you tried the T-11+? I've heard that is plays well with short pips and it is very light.

Clipper cc was huge letdown, i read that it should be good for pips and it played like a mid90s clipper but it plays like a cheap blade performs like 50$ at most, the 50$ avalox has a better response. well the T11 feels so hollow and dead



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net