Equipment - Acuda Blue Series vs Bluestorm series

Print Page | Close Window

Acuda Blue Series vs Bluestorm series

Printed From: Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET
Category: Equipment
Forum Name: Equipment
Forum Description: Share your experience and discussions about table tennis equipments.
Moderator: haggisv
Assistant Moderators: position available
URL: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=82346
Printed Date: 04/28/2024 at 6:37am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com

Topic: Acuda Blue Series vs Bluestorm series

Posted By: Stavros
Subject: Acuda Blue Series vs Bluestorm series
Date Posted: 04/25/2018 at 7:02am

May someone compare ?

-------------
InfinityVPS - D80 - D05

Replies:

Posted By: SmackDAT
Date Posted: 04/25/2018 at 8:02am

Acuda Blue is lower throw, smaller pores and more linear.

-------------
Zhang Jike ALC AN (88g)
Tenergy 05 Hard (2.1, B)
Tenergy 19 (2.1, R)
https://goo.gl/bFWoxW" rel="nofollow - https://goo.gl/bFWoxW

Posted By: jk92
Date Posted: 04/26/2018 at 10:20am

Played with Acuda Blue P2 for almost a year before switching to Bluestorm Z3 (exclusively on backhand)

Agree with SmackDAT, Acuda blue is more linear, a touch more spin. Bluestorm is explosive, yet easy to put balls back on the table.

The 45 degree P2 moving towards the Z3's 42.5 degree sponge was very easy, and at first the Z3 felt actually a bit firmer than the P2, but the middle thickness of P2 was 2.0mm and the middle thickness of Z3 was 2.1 so that might have something to do with it.

I always liked P2 for its thin topsheet and thicker sponge ratio, so it was natural to go to z3.

I am still concerned that Z2 is too hard at 47.5 to put on backhand

-------------
Timo Boll CAF Penhold
Donic Bluegrip R1
Andro Hexer Grip SFX