Print Page | Close Window

Rubber - Nittaku Factive 2.0mm - Has anyone tried?

Printed From: Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET
Category: Equipment
Forum Name: Equipment
Forum Description: Share your experience and discussions about table tennis equipments.
Moderator: haggisv
Assistant Moderators: position available

URL: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88836
Printed Date: 04/19/2024 at 12:28am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Rubber - Nittaku Factive 2.0mm - Has anyone tried?
Posted By: fmarek
Subject: Rubber - Nittaku Factive 2.0mm - Has anyone tried?
Date Posted: 09/14/2020 at 9:17am
Does anyone have experience with Nittaku Factive 2.0? 

I am curious what is "wrong" with it being so cheap comparing to other rubbers, say FastArc series.


-------------
729 Green Goblin 5, FH: 729 Battle II National H39, BH: Palio HK1997 Gold.
DHS Long 5, FH: 729 Battle II Gold H40, BH: Nittaku C1



Replies:
Posted By: AMonteiro
Date Posted: 09/14/2020 at 8:44pm
It's Nittaku competitor to Butterfly Rozena.

-------------
Dynaryz AGR /Yasaka Goiabao 5 / Dynaryz AGR


Posted By: andzejgolot
Date Posted: 09/17/2020 at 5:04pm
dont recommend it
-bottom out 
-not spinny
-low throw
-there is no special control or something more than average.
Revspin here is good with their opinion. Nothing special


Posted By: stiltt
Date Posted: 09/17/2020 at 9:41pm
Originally posted by andzejgolot andzejgolot wrote:

dont recommend it
-bottom out 
-not spinny
-low throw
-there is no special control or something more than average.
Revspin here is good with their opinion. Nothing special
take that as a review :) not for meeeeee.... 

I now need more reviews to be sure. It's like the AK47 or the Moon series... Because it's cheap does not mean it's bad. I need more opinions.


Edit: I like your direct style.



-------------
/forum/topic91512_page1.html#1124698" rel="nofollow - sales - forum_posts.asp?TID=19315" rel="nofollow - feedback


Posted By: andzejgolot
Date Posted: 09/17/2020 at 10:24pm
it doesnt matter, I played a lot with Fastarc G1/C1. For me the second one is more quality in terms spin direct shots  and sponge-ball feeling better than Factive and they both 45 degree
G1 is classy  47,5 degree rubber  but is different
I don't think about "cheap" this is not brand hate opinion. 
I had it I don't like it that is all.


Posted By: gekogark1212
Date Posted: 09/18/2020 at 1:58am
Originally posted by andzejgolot andzejgolot wrote:

dont recommend it
-bottom out 
-not spinny
-low throw
-there is no special control or something more than average.
Revspin here is good with their opinion. Nothing special
Sadly, I agree with this. After a good 6 months of comp, I HAD to change. It bottoms out a lot. It's ok in terms of spin (new gen stuff is much spinner), it goes into the sponge very easily (feels like Rozena but without the quick rebound). It's ultimately OK. Just OK. Therefore price to performance ratio isn't that high. 


-------------
(\__/)

(='.'=) But there's no sense crying over every mistake,

(")_(") You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.


Posted By: andzejgolot
Date Posted: 09/20/2020 at 10:27pm
people should put respek on my name.




Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net