|
|
Sponge thickness and lifting underspin |
Post Reply |
Author | |||
Stavros
Gold Member Joined: 12/02/2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 05/17/2018 at 6:49am |
||
Is MAX thickness sponge, better for lifting underspin ?
|
|||
InfinityVPS - D80 - D05
|
|||
Sponsored Links | |||
SmackDAT
Platinum Member Joined: 01/01/2012 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 2231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Yes, more dwell :)
|
|||
cole_ely
Premier Member Joined: 03/16/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I would say it's actually easier to lift and get the ball over with something less spinny aka thinner sponge. However your shot will be heavier if you can do it with thick. Am I wrong?
|
|||
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b
Please let me know if I can be of assistance. |
|||
Shifu
Super Member Joined: 01/15/2017 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 388 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
yes you are wrong. If there is a lot of spin you have to overcome it which is easier with a thicker sponge.
|
|||
cole_ely
Premier Member Joined: 03/16/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Overcome backspin?
|
|||
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b
Please let me know if I can be of assistance. |
|||
rocketman222
Gold Member Joined: 01/06/2007 Location: Walnut Creek,CA Status: Offline Points: 1152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Actually I think it's a combination of topsheet and sponge and how well they deform together, so probably a thick sponge works better to get heavy spin, but at low and medium end the sponge thickness shouldn't really effect it as much.
|
|||
cole_ely
Premier Member Joined: 03/16/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
so is it easier to lift underspin with pips?
|
|||
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b
Please let me know if I can be of assistance. |
|||
rocketman222
Gold Member Joined: 01/06/2007 Location: Walnut Creek,CA Status: Offline Points: 1152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
With pips there is not enough surface area in contact with ball and not enough friction?
|
|||
bars
Super Member Joined: 04/07/2017 Location: EZ Status: Offline Points: 167 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
sp/ thinner sponge easier to hit through. thicker easier to spin over? just get a year old rubber you wont even feel the underspin
|
|||
GeneralSpecific
Platinum Member Joined: 03/01/2010 Location: New York Status: Offline Points: 2811 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
This is a good question and I'm not entirely sure but I feel like if we're talking about the 1.7mm thickness and up range then it doesn't really matter. Let's say you have 2 sheets of the same rubber; one is 1.8mm and the other is 2.2mm. Both of those rubbers are probably thick enough to not bottom out when attack underspin. Bottoming out tends to be a problem only on counterloops or at least counterattacking attacks (such as counterattacking drives, a no spin pips attack, or any other incoming attack). So my guess is that as long as the sponge doesn't bottom out when attacking underspin, which never really happens, sponge thickness doesn't matter as long as all other variables remain the same. Again, I need to stress that I could be wrong and there might be things I haven't taken into consideration.
|
|||
Blade - Xiom 36.5 ALX FL
Forehand - Xiom Omega V Asia 2.0mm Backhand - Victas Curl P5V with Der Materialspezialist Firestorm Soft/Outkill 1.8mm sponge |
|||
cole_ely
Premier Member Joined: 03/16/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Generally speaking the spinnier the rubber is, the more important it is that you are swinging faster than the ball is spinning down to get the lift.
I'm sure folks are posting from an advanced perspective, but from a general perspective I think the less a racket feels spin the more the player can lift the ball successfully.
|
|||
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b
Please let me know if I can be of assistance. |
|||
GeneralSpecific
Platinum Member Joined: 03/01/2010 Location: New York Status: Offline Points: 2811 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Yes, that would make it easier but what I'm proposing is that, assuming the rubber is the same and all other variables are the same, once a minimum thickness is reached (I proposed 1.7mm but it's fairly rubber dependent), looping backspin close to the table will be very similar to the point where it shouldn't have a humanly perceivable difference.
|
|||
Blade - Xiom 36.5 ALX FL
Forehand - Xiom Omega V Asia 2.0mm Backhand - Victas Curl P5V with Der Materialspezialist Firestorm Soft/Outkill 1.8mm sponge |
|||
gekogark1212
Gold Member Joined: 05/06/2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1121 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Used 2mm exclusively for over 3 years, I had a major improvement in my backhand after changing to max. I certainly found it much easier lifting with max but to each their own.
|
|||
(\__/)
(='.'=) But there's no sense crying over every mistake, (")_(") You just keep on trying till you run out of cake. |
|||
cole_ely
Premier Member Joined: 03/16/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
I agree. I wasn't specifically addressing your assertion though, even though my post directly followed yours. |
|||
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b
Please let me know if I can be of assistance. |
|||
nv42
Super Member Joined: 01/22/2013 Location: india Status: Offline Points: 466 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If the rubber has a hard topsheet, then I suppose the change in sponge thickness won't affect it much when it comes to lifting underpin. Soft topsheets however take the sponges help to get that ball over the net, so the more the sponge, the better. I havnt tried much thickness variations, so this is opinion after a short experience only.
|
|||
bbkon
Premier Member Joined: 04/19/2005 Location: Afghanistan Status: Offline Points: 7260 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
it depends the throw of the blade and rubber |
|||
Stavros
Gold Member Joined: 12/02/2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
:( same blade, same rubber |
|||
InfinityVPS - D80 - D05
|
|||
igorponger
Premier Member Joined: 07/29/2006 Location: Everywhere Status: Offline Points: 3252 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
THE POWER OF PIPS.
The power of pips. Cheung Yuk using short pips. |
|||
SmackDAT
Platinum Member Joined: 01/01/2012 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 2231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
bbkon is misinformed. All variables controlled, thicker = easier to lift 100%. Both anecdotally and im sure someone can scientifically prove this if needed.
|
|||
GeneralSpecific
Platinum Member Joined: 03/01/2010 Location: New York Status: Offline Points: 2811 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Incorrect. Cheung Yuk uses inverted rubber.
|
|||
Blade - Xiom 36.5 ALX FL
Forehand - Xiom Omega V Asia 2.0mm Backhand - Victas Curl P5V with Der Materialspezialist Firestorm Soft/Outkill 1.8mm sponge |
|||
Lightzy
Super Member Joined: 09/18/2017 Location: T-A Status: Offline Points: 345 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Underspin balls are easier to lift with softer rubber and grippier topsheet.
|
|||
cole_ely
Premier Member Joined: 03/16/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If your arm speed is faster than the backspin
|
|||
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b
Please let me know if I can be of assistance. |
|||
Kolev
Gold Member Joined: 10/04/2004 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 1529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
+1 That's what I was going to say |
|||
Hallmark Carbon Extreme (x3)
FH: D05/G1/RX BH: Z2/D64/Ω7Pro |
|||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |