Review: Timo Boll ZLC vs ZLF

After practicing for several times, I would like to share my impression of these 2 blades.

Specification:

Layers:  ZLC � 5+2, ZLF � 5+2

Thickness:  ZLC � 5.6mm, ZLF � 5.4mm

Weight:  ZLC � 85g, ZLF � 80g

Handle:  Both are ST

Rubbers:  Both sides of Tenergy 05 were stuck on ZLC and ZLF

My first impression was that the hitting feeling of ZLF is softer than ZLC. In addition, ZLC performs high speed than ZLF. But I can only say that different players would like to have different hitting feeling.  Therefore, I think the performance is more critical for reference.

Forehand practice:

ZLF generates softer feeling while looping and better trajectory can be generated in comparison to ZLC. It is due to adequate dwell time for making full stroke of looping. Higher returning rate can be achieved during competition mode. When hitting and smashing, ZLF generates a bit vibration while exerting greater force. The reason may be that ZLF has thinner structure and the fiber layer is softer than ZL carbon.

For ZLC, I feel stiffer feeling when looping and smashing. ZLC generates relatively less spin than ZLF due to the shorter dwell time and higher bouncing rate. You need to make full stroke of looping within a bit less time period than ZLF so that adequate spin can be generated. But I love the smashing power of ZLC.  Flat trajectory and greater power is achieved. Your competitor will have less chance to return. If skillful player handles this blade, I think great spin and high speed will be achieved.

Backhand practice:

Absolutely, ZLF performs better control and better looping on backhand when receiving the ball. The returning and landing point can be controlled well. ZLF is good for the player with backhand looping style. ZLC performs acceptable control when receiving the ball. Relative flat trajectory than ZLF is experienced on backhand looping. However, as I mentioned before, ZLC also performs better smashing power on backhand.

Limitations of ZLC and ZLF:

The player may need to have full stroke of hitting on ZLF so that the power and speed can be generated.   On the other hand, ZLC may require the player who mastered better looping skill and hand feeling so that the adequate spin can be performed.

Conclusion:

It�s all my personal opinion. It may not be available for everyone. It was concluded that ZLF is perfect for both-side looper and who can self-exert force in close table to achieve fast attack.  ZLF is suitable for the player who is mainly playing with looping and sometimes smashing.   Absolutely, ZLC is more powerful blade (in comparison with ZLF only). I would suggest the skillful player to try this blade.

Speed: ZLC > ZLF

Spin : ZLF > ZLC

Hand feeling of looping: ZLF > ZLC (It is just my personal point of view)

Hand feeling of smashing: ZLC > ZLF  (It is just my personal point of view)

 

ZLC and ZLF