Mens's World Cup 2009 (Moscow, Russia) videos

almal wrote: Quarter Final   Chen Qi vs Maze Michael   http://depositfiles.com/files/r6um98zxo

For some reason, my downloads from Depositfiles break up in the middle... almost always lately. 2bad...

quarter final

Gustosz wrote: Joo Se Hyuk vs Timo Boll http://www.megaupload.com/?d=520FUDUX

 

Oh Sang Eun vs Kenta Matsudaira

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DGEYYH5D

i means last time all China's player are using cpen, Kong Ling Hui was the most successful player who start playing with shakehand, then u got Wang Li Qin, Ma Long... ... 

thanks gustosz!
could someone upload boll/kreanga please?

fortran2003 wrote: those Chinese's opinion: Beijing province team is a very important factor of the whole system. This team emphasize too much on using FH , so their player's BH are weak. As to Malong, also his forehand isn't powerful enough to threaten Samsonov, so, How to beat Sam (and Oh Sung Eun, etc)? They guess , Liu Guoling intents to depend on MaLin, Wang Hao and another young player named XuXin instead of MaLong to beat Samsonov .

I had no idea that there are regional differences in terms of emphasis on training. So it is true that Beijing province training emphasises on FH attack -- very interesting! You can certainly see that in Ma Long's style; he is happy to punch block on BH, similar to WLQ. His BH is not particularly threatening either. Wang Hao's BH, on the other hand, is possibly the best in the world.

fortran2003 wrote: Some Chinese predict MaLong (and WLQ) will fear Samsonov for ever, this is the consequences of wrong training strategy of Beijing province team. I don't know whether they are right or not.

Why is this?

I got the Eurosport Russian TV videos from torrents.ru - two QFs, both SFs, final and some portion of the 3rd place match.

But the files are huge - for some reason they are in VOB format so I will need to recode them and shrink a bit before trying to upload.

Well, Chen Qi is not so young... Just half a year younger than Wang Hao.

nothing

Either way, no matter what rubber he used or how nervious anyone was it was a master class in the game you need to play to beat the Chinese (if you can put the ball back on the table long enough sooner or later you will win)

If you think about it, almost all the player has chance to win, the tournament result in Samsonov's victory isn't that surprising.

Despite of Chinese player's higher chance of victory, you can't ignore that no one can 100% guaranty win when one against another in such high level playing.

Ma Long is very good, but he made some mistakes that cost him the match completely.

1. Samsonov's forehand defense is good with wide angle return. Ma Long knew its coming whenever he loop drive straight down the line. If Ma long didn't hit toward Samsonov's body close enough, Ma still get a wide angle return. (this match is favoured for Samsonov's blocking skill)

2. He was hurrying too much for the ball in the last game; missed 2 attack that should not have be there. Missed 2 ball in last match means Samsonov caught up and also boosted Samsonov's moral instead.

Last note, Samsonov's attack is getting better, especially he flip kill quite a few, and it really can pressure the opponent even more.

big d wrote: the only reason why he won was because of his experience and the reason why chen qi and ma long lost because samsonuvs game got to them he irritated them so much they started losing their biggest strength their drives they were missing the table but ma lin and wang hao would not hav done the same thing as we have seen in the past

"The only reason..."  Really?  That's so weak. 

Prove that Samsonov would have lost.  Prove that other players would have beaten him.  Its all academic.  (Obviously not possible.)

Making excuses for Samsonov winning?  Why not just accept that he was the best player in the tourney?