Acoustic Carbon Review courtesy of Tabletennis11

Why quote the entire post....

Hahahaha this is good!

I used to play with NAC outer for a while.
The blade is thin and stiff. 93g is quite heavy.
Speed and control is great, purely off not off+
Paring it with omega V tour and mxp, super head heavy.


Edited by Crowsfeather - 09/25/2016 at 10:13pm

Crowsfeather wrote: I used to play with NAC outer for a while. The blade is thin and stiff. 93g is quite heavy. Speed and control is great, purely off not off+ Paring it with omega V tour and mxp, super head heavy. The thin-blade really hurt my hand even if I sand it lightly so I just quit, apart from that it's a good offensive blade. You can control touch shot, keeping the ball low and short, while maintaining power on attacking. It's super linear it easy to hit with every shot. The blade it self vibrate a bit.   I never try NAC inner or large handle. I would rate it 8.5-9/10 while Schlager carbon is 11/10

Funny. I have an acoustic with Mx-P [FH] and OV:T on the BH.

Since I've had it for ages, and the handle is notoriously small, was thinking of either buying the larger handle acoustic, or the larger handle acoustic Carbon [or carbon inner], with those 2 rubbers again.

From what I read on Andy's year old review now, seems like the Carbon would benefit me. I stay up close to the table, loop and rally and flat hit mainly. The last one is the best part of my game, but i'm not able to do it as much, as its famine or feast due to how tight the timing window is on the original acoustic for that shot.