|
|
Bty Primorac Carbon vs Amultart vs Nittaku Feruku |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Luca abbatiello
Member Joined: 08/02/2014 Location: Napoli Status: Offline Points: 83 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 03/25/2015 at 10:57am |
Hi,
I would know some differences between this blades. A lot of people (top players too) use Bty Primorac Carbon. Nobody (?) use Bty Amultart or Nittaku Feruku. Why? Primorac Carbon is more easy? Stiff enough? More control? Thanks in advance.
|
|
Luca
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
TSuBaSa
Gold Member Joined: 10/01/2003 Location: Turkey Status: Offline Points: 1147 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Primorac feels harder, amultart feels softer and a bit springier on slow impact shots. Average amultart should be a bit lighter than primorac.
Both are stiff and fast but maybe amultart is too springy and soft for "god's" |
|
Nittaku Tenaly Acoustic Inner Carbon
Joola Rhyzer Pro 50 & 45 |
|
Luca abbatiello
Member Joined: 08/02/2014 Location: Napoli Status: Offline Points: 83 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What is fastest? Or spinnier?
|
|
Luca
|
|
Stavros
Gold Member Joined: 12/02/2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Primorac Carbon is better for hitting, blocking etc and Amultart is better for power looping.
|
|
InfinityVPS - D80 - D05
|
|
Luca abbatiello
Member Joined: 08/02/2014 Location: Napoli Status: Offline Points: 83 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Feruku. Nobody knows it?
|
|
Luca
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |