Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Alternative way to loop underspin
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login
tabletennis11.com

Alternative way to loop underspin

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Author
ghostzen View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 08/15/2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ghostzen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/04/2019 at 5:25am
Originally posted by blahness blahness wrote:

Originally posted by stiltt stiltt wrote:

Don't even answer, they just can't stand when somebody wants to stand out, they won't spend energy to do anything alike but they will put all their forces to prevent another person to do it.

They are just like a family member who does not want to spend their money in our business but find no problem and even prefer sponsoring a total stranger's by buying from them instead.

It's very close to jealousy in fact, you say fresh things under a new angle, "lower back protection and injury free style of play" while they pretend it's "standard"; your approach is not standard, it's a new way to apprehend the constraints of the game while keeping strategic goals fully supported; they take insult not having thought about it themselves or, better, they go "DO YOU THINK WE COULD NOT HAVE FIGURED THAT OUT BY OURSELVES???"; that's between disgusting and silly IMHO, negative for sure.

Keep up with the good work! you interest one person at least (many more, believe me).

BTW, the 3 axises (shoulder, waist, hips) was GOLD to me in that thread a while back (I owe you for that energy you spent there). In this thread, what I am taking home is what Fabian1890 wrote in his 1st post in page 1: that it supports his bh play better while not threatening his fh, all that protecting the lower back. You 2 are the kings in today's thread. Thanks to both of you.




Thank you again for the support. I guess its a forum, some will disagree and some will agree, the important part is the sharing of ideas and information! The only problem comes when people resort to snarky attacks and bad faith discussions. Like what you suggested I will simply not respond to any of these baits anymore... It's much better to live and let live :)




This is one thing we can agree on 100% ....some others we may not Wink but thats the idea isnt it?. No harm ment btw

Totally new ideas, different ways of thinking are good and backed by experience and technical facts are cracking and also a playing level to back them up helps.

If Gatein was doing this in the 80's and Ma Long and TH are doing it today and they are Pro's. It was the way I was taught and alot of players of my time and going forward and other forumers NL and MickD.

Then this is not something new or a totally unheard of way... It's a standard way of thinking honestly but I think if you take it down to a finite and very small concept in a tiny area you can jusitfy it in some way but that's where you and I differ.

With your very theoretical and highly controlled need to justify micro changes in say a few degrees of a foot and mine to have a practical working match sharp tool to play on the table....but

That's what makes a forum after all. Asking questions and finding answers is how everyone learns. Then decide which works for you and what doesn't and what works for the level of the game. The great thing about this game is adapt, adapt and adapt. 










Edited by ghostzen - 07/05/2019 at 5:56am
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/04/2019 at 8:53am
Originally posted by mickd mickd wrote:

Originally posted by blahness blahness wrote:

Originally posted by mickd mickd wrote:

Are you referring to having both feet pointing in the same direction (to the side) like the split squat image you linked above?

I think it'll be really hard to transfer your weight forward into your opposite playing foot if you had them both pointing in the same direction like that. If you did manage to do it, your non-playing leg foot will probably have to rotate to be facing forward during the stroke. Harimoto still has his left foot facing diagonally forward. Xu Xin has it (his right) facing a little more forward, and we can't see Ma Long's feet in the third picture.

I think your playing foot should be pointing sideways like the split squat, which Harimoto and Xu Xin both have in the pictures above. But your non-playing foot should be pointed more forward. And you should be folding your body over your leg (like a bow, though I think for injury prevention you're advocating not to lean as well as bow here?) to transfer all your weight to that side.

I could be missing it, though! There are slight differences, but I see the same key ingredients in all their strokes.

Getting low would also be influenced by the height and length of the incoming ball, the timing you're planning to hit it, your current position, and the type of ball you're going to play.

I'm thinking the underlying principle I'm seeing from this thread is to get low. Having a wider stance also makes getting lower easier (which the split squat definitely has). Your success could be attributed to getting lower than you usually do. I used to try and get super low, but I was never able to commit it to muscle memory!

No not really but closer in angle rather than say 90 deg (left leg at 12 o'clock and right leg at 3oclock). And yes with this method both feet have to rotate. Right foot goes from roughly 3 o'clock to 1oclock and left foot goes from 2oclock to 12oclock. 
The CNT players all have slightly different technique but generally they have their right leg roughly around 2oclock and left leg around 12 oclock, then they compress their right waist to get low. 
Although these may be "slight" differences but because of biomechanics it makes a world of difference. Harimoto's method simply allows you to get really low easily without compressing the right waist, which is the key point I am making. 

Oh, so just having that one foot parallel to the table. I had a hard time picturing it because the split squat picture has both feet parallel, and that would make it a disaster to try and rotate forward into the ball.

I think I see what you're saying now. I'm just not sure if this is something the Chinese don't do. Even that ZJK video above with him looping against a chopper, I see his right leg completely parallel to the table on at least one of the shots. There are also shots where he has his right leg facing slightly forward like you've mentioned, though.

Does Harimoto always have his foot parallel? I would think he would have them parallel sometimes and facing forward slightly sometimes, too.

As for injury prevention, this might be something to take into consideration. For people who have a bad back, but good knees/legs, they could definitely get lower by adjusting their feet angle and stance (I think having a wider stance would help with this too maybe?)

Pros often maximize power at the cost of their bodies. So even if they could save their backs by not leaning their waist to the side, they probably would because it's another source of power.

(P.S. Personally I often have my foot parallel to the table against top and under spin. I added a picture below from a recent match I had. Though this was against top spin).



EDIT: Oh, and I should probably add that I like having these kinds of discussions. As an adult learner, I like thinking about these things. I'm also at a point where I can usually decide for myself whether something will work well for me or not, but I do also understand the other side of the argument because a few years ago I couldn't, and I tried a lot of incorrect things I thought were correct. I also prefer a lively forum with lots of discussions, controversial or not, than a dead one!! Let's keep it civil Smile
Hmmm... doing this against topspin just like Harimoto does. I think we should make distinctions between what people do because they are athletes and what people do because they are part of proper technique.  I am not even sure whether Harimoto is just an exceptionally limber individual or whether he is inventing new technique.   The idea is intriguing.

If you lift a heavy object, you don't want to overuse your back muscles but you are going to use your back muscles.  What you don't want is to stress your back muscles by using them in a way that it affects your spine. Hip rotation solves most of the problem as well as playing mostly within the power level generater by your hip rotation, but I think if someone believes that back muscles have no place in safe TT, it is something one can say but which one will have a tough time defending.  Proper throwing technique uses the back muscles.

My real "secret" is having very long arms. But to maintain standard looping form, I loop more upwards than someone with your ability to get low might.  The principles of what we do aren't that different. 
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
ghostzen View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 08/15/2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote ghostzen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 6:38am
standard looping form is a good way to explain it NL. It's something that most players do or try to do.

Having played and trained with a fair few really decent choppers in my time I have always tried to hold a working form.

One of the coaches i trained with drummed it into me to KISS (KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID) if I was over thinking things in a match.
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 10:02am
Originally posted by aerial aerial wrote:

dude, I don't see much toxicity in any of the posts except for the ones that you're trying to call him out on for just bringing his side of the discussion to the forum, which what a forum is meant to be...

that being said, I'm big into lumbar flexion (or avoiding it) due to previous injuries tt related and weight-training related so I always like this topic being discussed on the forum Thumbs Up

I also trained with NL when I visited his home-club like... at this point maybe 3 years ago? my forehand still sucks and I still don't "know" my stroke as NL said lol. real life just gets in the way of pong life... 

c'est la vie

Thanks, and to be clear, I have nothing against talking about lumbar flexion.  Back injuries are common in all sports and injury prevention is important.  In fact, my arthritis gave me injuries all by itself.  TT was just the icing on the cake.  

But that said, talking to high level coaches, especially those who played at a decent level, gives you a different insight into technique and injury.  High level coaches try to stop motions that cause injuries. The biggest source of injuries is trying to get power from motions that cannot handle the stress.  It requires you to to learn how to use your body properly.  That said, a lot of injury prevention also comes from self care because the human body can only handle so much physical activity without rest and restoration.  If anyone playing table tennis isn't getting massages or using a roller or something to take care of the tightness that builds up in the muscles, you are due for something at some point as tight muscles pull on tendons and need to relax to free them up.

The thing I tell people is that you need to hit the ball essentially the same way every single time, and then learn how to adjust to spin with practice.  Top players are mostly doing one stroke which they have adapted to the ball with practice and learning to adjust their body to create different stroke trajectories and to adapt to different incoming spins and placements.  

I have learned a lot more about technique since the time I spoke to you and I have better ways of teaching how to hit a TT ball.  I don't even practice what I preach well enough but I know the limitations of reality like gravity.

Harimoto does just about everything blahness wrote about on his standard forehand loop (vs block).  So why is this an alternative way to loop underspin?  All Harimoto is doing (for anyone who understands standard technique) is getting a deeper knee bend on his left knee as part of his hip rotation on the backswing.    He is not folding his torso as much as some might but it goes back to the question of where is the video of what he was looping so we can even confirm the ball was heavy underspin.  Adjusting to the ball leads to all kinds of things that may or may not be part of a base technique.  The main benefit of getting lower is that it helps you keep the ball lower and play lower balls.

Here is a video that goes into detail on how to loop underspin.  Here, the lowering of the body with the hip rotation on the backswing is not as low as Harimoto.  But conceptually, it is the same stroke.  No, not an alternative.  Standard forehand technique is standard forehand technique, even if some do it better than others.


Something the video doesn't mention which I like to emphasize to students is that when you are looping underspin, there is a strong emphasis on spinning the ball because underspin wants to go into the table/net so you need to have a very spin focused stroke.  If you want to drive the ball faster, spin the ball more with more power, don't try to hit it harder.


Edited by NextLevel - 07/05/2019 at 10:03am
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
Ieyasu View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 07/18/2015
Location: DPR Kalifornia
Status: Offline
Points: 203
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ieyasu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 12:02pm
Hadn't seen that video before. Thanks for posting NL.

While watching it I kept thinking a video I had seen of Ma Long hitting underspin was an excellent demo. But right at the end, Brett refers to that very same video. The two videos compliment each other very well. 

(The difference in elbow distance from the body between the two is also interesting.)


Edited by Ieyasu - 07/05/2019 at 12:03pm
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 12:22pm
Originally posted by Ieyasu Ieyasu wrote:

Hadn't seen that video before. Thanks for posting NL.

While watching it I kept thinking a video I had seen of Ma Long hitting underspin was an excellent demo. But right at the end, Brett refers to that very same video. The two videos compliment each other very well. 

(The difference in elbow distance from the body between the two is also interesting.)

Thanks.  IMO, the elbow distance is one of those nuances that is related to your technique and not part of looping backspin as long as you don't engage the upper arm too much - it does make controlling the backswing easier IMO but some people prefer direct backswings.  If I was coaching, I would tell you to keep the elbow close and to limit upper arm usage as much as possible, but if you found me a video of Kreanga or Boll doing it a bit differently, I would just tell you okay.  But if you felt that you wanted to just drop your arm and that it was optional getting the shoulder lower with some combination of folding the torso and rotating the hip to lower the racket, I would just say that is clearly inferior technique. 
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
ghostzen View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 08/15/2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote ghostzen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 4:36pm
Great link NL much appreciated 👍
Back to Top
Ieyasu View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 07/18/2015
Location: DPR Kalifornia
Status: Offline
Points: 203
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ieyasu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 5:33pm
NL wrote:
"IMO, the elbow distance is one of those nuances that is related to your technique and not part of looping backspin as long as you don't engage the upper arm too much - it does make controlling the backswing easier IMO but some people prefer direct backswings."

Thanks. I was curious whether you thought the difference was significant.

Five years ago on this forum there was a bit of discussion regarding arm extension in the backswing here: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/angular-momentum-info-from-larry-hodges_topic64840.html sparked by some brief comments by Larry Hodges on his blog: http://tabletenniscoaching.com/node/1720

As an aside, that is why I disagree with Blahness's claim that Harimoto's backswing is "way too much arm backswing." At best it's ambiguous or misleading because the ML video clearly shows ML taking a very long arm swing-path against backspin. Harimoto's swing-path is just as long except the arm is a tad further from his body.


Edited by Ieyasu - 07/05/2019 at 6:01pm
Back to Top
mjamja View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: 05/30/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2895
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mjamja Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 5:34pm
OMG  -  I saw a partial clip of that video and patterned my entire backspin looping technique on the "how not to" section not knowing there was a  "how to" section that came later.

Ok, I never really saw the video.  But it is remarkable how much my loop against underspin looks just like what he first showed.  Been working 2+ yrs to get it to look more normall without much luck.

Mark
Back to Top
stiltt View Drop Down
Assistant Admin
Assistant Admin
Avatar

Joined: 07/15/2007
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 1019
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stiltt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 6:31pm
Originally posted by Ieyasu Ieyasu wrote:

...
As an aside, that is why I disagree with Blahness's claim that Harimoto's backswing is "way too much arm backswing." At best it's ambiguous or misleading because the ML video clearly shows ML taking a very long arm swing-path against backspin. Harimoto's swing-path is just as long except the arm is a tad further from his body.
If we agree that in theory, we choose the most efficient way, then more backswing than necessary means waste. So the question should be instead: "can TH fh loop with less backswing to save time and energy?" if yes, then blahness is right; but we could go the other way saying that at that age, there is plenty of energy and speed available and not in use so that waste is not the priority in things to fix if there are any. 
I would tend to go as efficient as possible, gaining little things here and there is what pays off overtime. Think of cyclists selling their mom to shave 20 grams off their bike. I bet those guys at the top of TT are the same, if they can get an edge, they'll work for it. The only thing that strikes me is the brutality of his fh, the legs work in the backswing and the swing is so strong, stronger than needed, the same racket speed at contact can be reached spending way less energy. Compare throwing a disc and a sledgehammer, it seems he throws the latter. But there is maybe a reason for that, if fluidity builds up on top of that as he peaks a couple years down the road, it could be scary for example.
The evolution of TH's fh is so interesting, as his body evolves into his adult age and training shapes his fh in a controlled environment with the best coaches, we could end up with something radically new and ridiculously efficient in terms of connection with the bh. The next 2 years are going to be determinant, I hope whatever route he chooses doesn't mute his bh in a tt mystery hard to anticipate.

Back to Top
Ieyasu View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 07/18/2015
Location: DPR Kalifornia
Status: Offline
Points: 203
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ieyasu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 6:45pm
stlitt wrote:
"can TH fh loop with less backswing to save time and energy?" if yes, then blahness is right;"

You are begging the question. Based on videos I've seen I don't see a difference in backswing length. Both players' swings look equally long to me against underspin. Of course, their swing lengths are not always the same.

Harimoto appears to swing with his arm further from his body than ML, but that does not mean his swing is longer. Eg., I can take a very short swing with my elbow "far" from my body.

I suspect the disagreement is more semantics than anything else.


Edited by Ieyasu - 07/05/2019 at 6:49pm
Back to Top
blahness View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/18/2009
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 5443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blahness Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 6:47pm
Originally posted by stiltt stiltt wrote:

Originally posted by Ieyasu Ieyasu wrote:

...
As an aside, that is why I disagree with Blahness's claim that Harimoto's backswing is "way too much arm backswing." At best it's ambiguous or misleading because the ML video clearly shows ML taking a very long arm swing-path against backspin. Harimoto's swing-path is just as long except the arm is a tad further from his body.
If we agree that in theory, we choose the most efficient way, then more backswing than necessary means waste. So the question should be instead: "can TH fh loop with less backswing to save time and energy?" if yes, then blahness is right; but we could go the other way saying that at that age, there is plenty of energy and speed available and not in use so that waste is not the priority in things to fix if there are any. 
I would tend to go as efficient as possible, gaining little things here and there is what pays off overtime. Think of cyclists selling their mom to shave 20 grams off their bike. I bet those guys at the top of TT are the same, if they can get an edge, they'll work for it. The only thing that strikes me is the brutality of his fh, the legs work in the backswing and the swing is so strong, stronger than needed, the same racket speed at contact can be reached spending way less energy. Compare throwing a disc and a sledgehammer, it seems he throws the latter. But there is maybe a reason for that, if fluidity builds up on top of that as he peaks a couple years down the road, it could be scary for example.
The evolution of TH's fh is so interesting, as his body evolves into his adult age and training shapes his fh in a controlled environment with the best coaches, we could end up with something radically new and ridiculously efficient in terms of connection with the bh. The next 2 years are going to be determinant, I hope whatever route he chooses doesn't mute his bh in a tt mystery hard to anticipate.


I watched Harimoto vs Wong Chun Ting in the Korea Open recently, he tightened that backswing a lot, now the elbow is quite close to the body during the backswing. Arm backswing makes the stroke less stable and slower imo. 


-------
Viscaria
FH: Hurricane 8-80
BH: D05

Back to normal shape bats :(
Back to Top
blahness View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/18/2009
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 5443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blahness Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 7:48pm
Originally posted by Ieyasu Ieyasu wrote:

NL wrote:
"IMO, the elbow distance is one of those nuances that is related to your technique and not part of looping backspin as long as you don't engage the upper arm too much - it does make controlling the backswing easier IMO but some people prefer direct backswings."

Thanks. I was curious whether you thought the difference was significant.

Five years ago on this forum there was a bit of discussion regarding arm extension in the backswing here: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/angular-momentum-info-from-larry-hodges_topic64840.html sparked by some brief comments by Larry Hodges on his blog: http://tabletenniscoaching.com/node/1720

As an aside, that is why I disagree with Blahness's claim that Harimoto's backswing is "way too much arm backswing." At best it's ambiguous or misleading because the ML video clearly shows ML taking a very long arm swing-path against backspin. Harimoto's swing-path is just as long except the arm is a tad further from his body.

Larry Hodges had the right idea. Btw when I talk about arm backswing it is relative to the body. If you use your body to do the backswing your arm might move a long distance but relative to the body it is not moving a lot. The easiest way would be to look at the position of the elbow relative to the torso during the backswing. If it is far away then that indicates arm backswing, otherwise there's not. Most pros do not have much of an arm backswing in today's game due to the speed required. 
-------
Viscaria
FH: Hurricane 8-80
BH: D05

Back to normal shape bats :(
Back to Top
stiltt View Drop Down
Assistant Admin
Assistant Admin
Avatar

Joined: 07/15/2007
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 1019
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stiltt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 8:10pm
Originally posted by Ieyasu Ieyasu wrote:

stlitt wrote:
"can TH fh loop with less backswing to save time and energy?" if yes, then blahness is right;"

You are begging the question. Based on videos I've seen I don't see a difference in backswing length. Both players' swings look equally long to me against underspin. Of course, their swing lengths are not always the same.

Harimoto appears to swing with his arm further from his body than ML, but that does not mean his swing is longer. Eg., I can take a very short swing with my elbow "far" from my body.

I suspect the disagreement is more semantics than anything else.
right, it’s nitpicking based on expectations I’m nobody to set, despite his genius that easily carries me away. 
What about the energy input from the legs? Is it exaggerated? Brutal? Does fluidity need to step in urgently before the definite settling of an energy/recovery/time hungry lumberjack FH loop? It seems his natural close to the table bh king game could suffer from such a overshadowing FH wanting it all. 
Just random thoughts.

Back to Top
Ieyasu View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 07/18/2015
Location: DPR Kalifornia
Status: Offline
Points: 203
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ieyasu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 8:28pm
Originally posted by stiltt stiltt wrote:

Originally posted by Ieyasu Ieyasu wrote:

stlitt wrote:

I suspect the disagreement is more semantics than anything else.
right, it’s nitpicking based on expectations.


If you intended to say that a difference in the understanding of what words mean (semantics) is nitpicking, in this instance (as well as generally),  I strongly disagree.
Back to Top
penholderxxx View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 09/19/2016
Location: Asia
Status: Offline
Points: 451
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote penholderxxx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 9:06pm
We are moving into the realm where pros would not even think of. LOL
Iloveplayingtabletennis
Back to Top
blahness View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/18/2009
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 5443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blahness Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/05/2019 at 10:54pm
Originally posted by penholderxxx penholderxxx wrote:

We are moving into the realm where pros would not even think of. LOL

Well Harimoto got rid of his FH arm backswing in this Korean Open. Also if you watch LGL and the CNT coaching and training, they absolutely care about the details of the techniques.  

Do you still think they aren't thinking about these issues? 

-------
Viscaria
FH: Hurricane 8-80
BH: D05

Back to normal shape bats :(
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/06/2019 at 5:35am
The truth is that arm positioning on a specific shot can be the result of a variety of things during a point.  It is different from what it is during training a rally shot.  When you backswing or swing really hard and you have a loose arm for maximum whip, you get a lag on the backswing that makes the upper arm fly back harder.  Whether you want this depends on many things, including the intention to kill the ball vs just to play a rally shot.  If you watched Ma Long playing a max power (windmill) shot in a match, you would see a purportedly larger backswing as well. 

I am still waiting for someone to post the actual shot where the still in the original post was taken from so we can look at it in the context of the point.  Discussing TT without having the full context can distort the analysis and conclusions.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
ghostzen View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 08/15/2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ghostzen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/07/2019 at 4:06am
The actual video would help lots in the discussions to be honest. 
Back to Top
ghostzen View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 08/15/2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ghostzen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/08/2019 at 7:03am
Having watched some of the Ma Long and FZD training videos from TTD it's looks like both players play this stroke pretty well all the time when they are in correct position. when they aren't mind their footwork can vary a bit … and their strokes. I suppose it's a case of adapting all the time if you aren't in the correct position even the Pro seem to do the same
Back to Top
blahness View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/18/2009
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 5443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blahness Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/08/2019 at 11:55pm
There's nothing to see here guys, remember KISS principle - just get low and hit the ball. It's all standard technique! 
 
Edit: looks like I needed a sarcasm tag... LOL


Edited by blahness - 07/09/2019 at 2:00am
-------
Viscaria
FH: Hurricane 8-80
BH: D05

Back to normal shape bats :(
Back to Top
ghostzen View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 08/15/2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ghostzen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/09/2019 at 1:33am
That we agree on... Clap no tag required.. got it the first time Wink...

If this is the alterative way to loop what's the standard then? 😉


Edited by ghostzen - 07/09/2019 at 8:44am
Back to Top
ghostzen View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 08/15/2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ghostzen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/09/2019 at 11:23am
Maybe one day we should sit down with a few beers each and a bottle of vodka and have a good old chat about TT eh Blahness? We would probably try and put the world to rights and you could confuse the bejesus out of me Wacko with your breakdown of strokes and there uses. If you are ever in the UK drop me a line mate.
 
Back to Top
bard romance View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 02/18/2016
Location: FL
Status: Offline
Points: 1185
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bard romance Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/09/2019 at 11:33am
Perhaps blahness could send videos comparing the two options so we could see the advantages.
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/09/2019 at 12:16pm
Originally posted by blahness blahness wrote:

There's nothing to see here guys, remember KISS principle - just get low and hit the ball. It's all standard technique! 
 
Edit: looks like I needed a sarcasm tag... LOL

But since you are saying there is an alternative,  shouldn't the video show it?   
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
blahness View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/18/2009
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 5443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blahness Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/09/2019 at 6:01pm
Originally posted by bard romance bard romance wrote:

Perhaps blahness could send videos comparing the two options so we could see the advantages.

No performance advantages... I would say they are equally effective. The only "advantage" the alternative has is to eliminate lumbar flexion and knee shear.

Basically, either you bend down by a combination of bending knees and leaning over (using lumbar flexion), which makes your playing side shoulder much lower than your other shoulder, or you rotate your feet more to achieve a much deeper bend in your knees, while keeping torso straight. 




Edited by blahness - 07/09/2019 at 6:06pm
-------
Viscaria
FH: Hurricane 8-80
BH: D05

Back to normal shape bats :(
Back to Top
blahness View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/18/2009
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 5443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blahness Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/09/2019 at 6:02pm
Originally posted by ghostzen ghostzen wrote:

Maybe one day we should sit down with a few beers each and a bottle of vodka and have a good old chat about TT eh Blahness? We would probably try and put the world to rights and you could confuse the bejesus out of me Wacko with your breakdown of strokes and there uses. If you are ever in the UK drop me a line mate.
 

Lol sure, it's half the world away tho haha! 
-------
Viscaria
FH: Hurricane 8-80
BH: D05

Back to normal shape bats :(
Back to Top
ghostzen View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 08/15/2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ghostzen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/09/2019 at 6:37pm
You never know you might one day be in my neck of the woods or me yours. First rounds on me. Big smile

Edited by ghostzen - 07/09/2019 at 6:37pm
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/09/2019 at 9:35pm
Originally posted by blahness blahness wrote:

Originally posted by bard romance bard romance wrote:

Perhaps blahness could send videos comparing the two options so we could see the advantages.

No performance advantages... I would say they are equally effective. The only "advantage" the alternative has is to eliminate lumbar flexion and knee shear.

Basically, either you bend down by a combination of bending knees and leaning over (using lumbar flexion), which makes your playing side shoulder much lower than your other shoulder, or you rotate your feet more to achieve a much deeper bend in your knees, while keeping torso straight. 



If anyone looks at the TTEDGE video, none of the techniques espoused require you to drop the shoulder and use lumbar flexion. Ma Long and Xu Xin do not do this either, they fold their torso by bowing and not by twisting their spine over one side to drop one shoulder lower.  

It is a great service you have done to point out that people should not be looping underspin by folding one abdominal to drop the shoulder and twist their spine.  But this is not how most pros are trained to loop underspin and what Brett is teaching is 100% the way it is done with none of the shoulder dropping you are talking about.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
symbat View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 03/01/2019
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote symbat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/10/2019 at 12:13am
Originally posted by blahness blahness wrote:

Originally posted by mickd mickd wrote:

Originally posted by blahness blahness wrote:

Originally posted by mickd mickd wrote:

Are you referring to having both feet pointing in the same direction (to the side) like the split squat image you linked above?

I think it'll be really hard to transfer your weight forward into your opposite playing foot if you had them both pointing in the same direction like that. If you did manage to do it, your non-playing leg foot will probably have to rotate to be facing forward during the stroke. Harimoto still has his left foot facing diagonally forward. Xu Xin has it (his right) facing a little more forward, and we can't see Ma Long's feet in the third picture.

I think your playing foot should be pointing sideways like the split squat, which Harimoto and Xu Xin both have in the pictures above. But your non-playing foot should be pointed more forward. And you should be folding your body over your leg (like a bow, though I think for injury prevention you're advocating not to lean as well as bow here?) to transfer all your weight to that side.

I could be missing it, though! There are slight differences, but I see the same key ingredients in all their strokes.

Getting low would also be influenced by the height and length of the incoming ball, the timing you're planning to hit it, your current position, and the type of ball you're going to play.

I'm thinking the underlying principle I'm seeing from this thread is to get low. Having a wider stance also makes getting lower easier (which the split squat definitely has). Your success could be attributed to getting lower than you usually do. I used to try and get super low, but I was never able to commit it to muscle memory!

No not really but closer in angle rather than say 90 deg (left leg at 12 o'clock and right leg at 3oclock). And yes with this method both feet have to rotate. Right foot goes from roughly 3 o'clock to 1oclock and left foot goes from 2oclock to 12oclock. 
The CNT players all have slightly different technique but generally they have their right leg roughly around 2oclock and left leg around 12 oclock, then they compress their right waist to get low. 
Although these may be "slight" differences but because of biomechanics it makes a world of difference. Harimoto's method simply allows you to get really low easily without compressing the right waist, which is the key point I am making. 

Oh, so just having that one foot parallel to the table. I had a hard time picturing it because the split squat picture has both feet parallel, and that would make it a disaster to try and rotate forward into the ball.

I think I see what you're saying now. I'm just not sure if this is something the Chinese don't do. Even that ZJK video above with him looping against a chopper, I see his right leg completely parallel to the table on at least one of the shots. There are also shots where he has his right leg facing slightly forward like you've mentioned, though.

Does Harimoto always have his foot parallel? I would think he would have them parallel sometimes and facing forward slightly sometimes, too.

As for injury prevention, this might be something to take into consideration. For people who have a bad back, but good knees/legs, they could definitely get lower by adjusting their feet angle and stance (I think having a wider stance would help with this too maybe?)

Pros often maximize power at the cost of their bodies. So even if they could save their backs by not leaning their waist to the side, they probably would because it's another source of power.

(P.S. Personally I often have my foot parallel to the table against top and under spin. I added a picture below from a recent match I had. Though this was against top spin).



EDIT: Oh, and I should probably add that I like having these kinds of discussions. As an adult learner, I like thinking about these things. I'm also at a point where I can usually decide for myself whether something will work well for me or not, but I do also understand the other side of the argument because a few years ago I couldn't, and I tried a lot of incorrect things I thought were correct. I also prefer a lively forum with lots of discussions, controversial or not, than a dead one!! Let's keep it civil :)

Actually to clarify when I was talking about the direction of the feet, it was relative to the hitting direction rather than the table. Relative to table is hard to say because there's many possibilities. But feet position relative to the hitting direction is usually quite consistent for any player. 

Yours looks pretty similar to Harimoto's position except for the extra thoracic rotation that he has and he rotates a bit more on the nonplaying foot. 

Actually, I think for both players the nonplaying foot is aimed at the middle of the table on the opponents side.  Only difference is Harimoto's heal is off the ground.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.266 seconds.

Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Web Wiz News
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer

MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd.

Copyright ©2003-2024 Alex Table Tennis Ltd. All rights reserved.