|
|
Glue Fight: Hide vs. PU |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
Hipnotic
Silver Member Joined: 09/30/2019 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 772 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Posted: 08/30/2020 at 7:30am |
|
There is a lot of talk about hide glue and the great feeling it provides. I’m always skeptical of this kind of claims so I decided to test this myself by building two exact blades, with the only variable being the glue used. First I will give a brief description of these two glues: Hide Glue: This is an animal protein based glue, which is water soluble. Because of this it is vastly used in instrument building and repair. The ease of reversibility allows luthiers to perform repairs without damaging the instrument by simply injecting moisture into the joint. The glue doesn’t penetrate the wood, instead it forms a layer over the material and bonds to it. This glue is hard to work with because it has to be applied while still hot. Because of this it has a very short open time, and if the layers aren’t clamped within this time frame a poor bond can be formed. PU Glue: Polyurethane glue is a polymer based adhesive with great strength. It is waterproof once cured and it penetrates the pores of the wood forming a great bond. It is easier to work with because it has a relatively high open time. Building procedure: I decided to perform this test with a 5 ply composition similar to the perhaps most famous hide glue blade out there, the Nittaku Acoustic. But instead of using a Limba medial ply, I chose to use a harder but thinner Sycamore Maple layer. So, the composition is Limba / Sycamore / Kiri / Sycamore / Limba. All the plies were carefully selected so that the weight before the glue was applied was the same. The method for applying the glue was the same on both blades, a layer of glue on both sides to be glued, and the blades were clamped at the same time, using the same pressure. The weight difference after the plies were glued and the shape was 0.6g, with the PU blade being the heavier. It wasn’t possible to keep the handles with the same exact weight but the difference was very small. The final weight of the blades was 89.5g for both. Results: These were my findings after testing both blades. The first difference I noticed was on the pitch while bouncing a ball on the bare blades. The Hide glue blade possessed a lower pitch, which was corroborated by the measured peak frequency. The Hide glue blade measured 1205 Hz while the PU measured 1227 Hz, a small but noticeable difference. This immediately told me the PU blade would be a little harder and stiffer. These were also the impressions I got during play. The Hide glue blade provides a slightly softer feeling, while the PU feels just a little harder and faster. Conclusion: So, is there a difference? Short answer: Yes! But is one better than the other? Not necessarily… I have a preference for softer blades so in this case my vote goes for the Hide glue blade, but I’m sure that a lot of people would prefer the more solid and direct feeling of the PU blade. This decision is very subjective and would depend on the player. Keep in mind that these differences were very small, and in a blind test some might not even notice the difference. There is also the matter of the amount of glue used. With hide glue a layer on each side is needed to have a perfect bond, but with PU glue I normally just need one layer to have a strong bond. So in the case of this test I used more glue than needed, which exacerbated the feeling. In retrospect, I should’ve built a third blade using this method... |
||
SDC Handmade Blades / www.sdcttblades.com / Insta - @sdc_tt_blades / Facebook - @SDCblades
|
||
Sponsored Links | ||
Tinykin
Platinum Member Joined: 10/30/2003 Location: England Status: Online Points: 2336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Interesting. Say that you waited about 6 months before using the blades, would there be any difference in your findings?
|
||
Blade:
Darker Speed90 Rubber Fh and Bh DHS Hurricane 3, 39/38deg Delusion is an asset |
||
Hipnotic
Silver Member Joined: 09/30/2019 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 772 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
That's a good question. PU glue has a longer setting time, it takes a few hours until it's dry to the touch and a few more until it has completely cured, but once this happen it will remain stable. Hide glue on the other hand, has a faster setting time. It will set quicker but it will continue to loose moisture after a long period of time. So I suppose that in a few months time the blade will be a bit lighter (probably less than a gram) and a bit harder. But if that difference will be perceivable remains to be known. I will measure the peak frequency then to see if there is any change.
|
||
SDC Handmade Blades / www.sdcttblades.com / Insta - @sdc_tt_blades / Facebook - @SDCblades
|
||
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This is great. You should let somebody else try them blind to see if they can discern a difference, ideally a few people.
|
||
cole_ely
Premier Member Joined: 03/16/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
i feel like hide glue is more likely to come apart over time
|
||
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b
Please let me know if I can be of assistance. |
||
Hipnotic
Silver Member Joined: 09/30/2019 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 772 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes, I'm gonna let my team mates have a go to get their opinion.
There is definitely a bigger risk and that is one of the downsides, and the reason I don't use it more often. If left in humid conditions there is a risk of separation.
|
||
SDC Handmade Blades / www.sdcttblades.com / Insta - @sdc_tt_blades / Facebook - @SDCblades
|
||
doraemon
Gold Member Joined: 05/14/2007 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1738 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I am really impressed that you did the experiment and share it here. Thank you. I would also state my opinion: I think that people used to praise Acoustic because it was previously used by Ma Long and the impression of hide glue is "special glue" that is used for high price string instruments. I believe if there are two identical blades, one built with hide glue and the other one built with other glue, with approximately equal weight and exact wood composition and thickness, I would say that most people can't really tell the difference. People always say how sweet Acoustic and Violin feel in your hand. From my experience, yes Violin felt different (or special as some might say) but I didn't feel anything special when using Acoustic. So our mind set is already influenced by comments we read online so we thought that it was special.
|
||
Blade : Just wood
FH : black rubber BH : red rubber |
||
Hipnotic
Silver Member Joined: 09/30/2019 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 772 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes I agree. They are good blades for sure, but as usual marketing hype and the fact that it was used by a pro player elevates the blade to an almost legendary status that shapes people's opinion beforehand.
|
||
SDC Handmade Blades / www.sdcttblades.com / Insta - @sdc_tt_blades / Facebook - @SDCblades
|
||
Hipnotic
Silver Member Joined: 09/30/2019 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 772 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Some time has passed and both blades have been played for a few weeks, but have been stored for most of the time. Measuring their current weights, the PU blade lost 0.3g while the hide glue one lost 0.8g. This is in line with what I was expecting, but the most interesting part is that the peak frequency is 1227 Hz for both. So, there was an increase of approximately 22 Hz in the hide glue blade, meaning it became a bit stiffer, while the other one remained stable.
I will test both blades again to see if the changes in the numbers represent any real difference in the playing properties.
|
||
SDC Handmade Blades / www.sdcttblades.com / Insta - @sdc_tt_blades / Facebook - @SDCblades
|
||
zeio
Premier Member Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 10833 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
What about the total thickness? I suppose the hide glue one should be slightly thinner and thus slightly denser now than the PU one?
|
||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
||
Hipnotic
Silver Member Joined: 09/30/2019 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 772 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
We can assume the moisture loss happened mostly in the glue layers that are already very thin to begin. Some shrinking is likely to have happened, but we are talking less than a tenth of mm here, so not something my calipers can measure.
|
||
SDC Handmade Blades / www.sdcttblades.com / Insta - @sdc_tt_blades / Facebook - @SDCblades
|
||
zeio
Premier Member Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 10833 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Another reason for the upshift in frequency could be due to cross-linking. Filler also affects the stiffness.
https://cool.culturalheritage.org/albumen/library/c20/vonendt1991.html |
||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
||
Hipnotic
Silver Member Joined: 09/30/2019 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 772 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Probably. But chemistry is definitely not one of my areas of expertise
|
||
SDC Handmade Blades / www.sdcttblades.com / Insta - @sdc_tt_blades / Facebook - @SDCblades
|
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |