Print Page | Close Window

Sidespon-topspin against backspin?

Printed From: Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET
Category: Coaching & Tips
Forum Name: Coaching & Tips
Forum Description: Learn more about TT from the experts. Feel free to share your knowledge & experience.
Moderator: yogi_bear
Assistant Moderators: APW46, smackman
URL: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=61205
Printed Date: 04/27/2024 at 10:02am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Sidespon-topspin against backspin?
Posted By: 33333hhhhh
Subject: Sidespon-topspin against backspin?
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 7:20pm
Hi everyone, I went to a big competition with a 11 yo little girl from my club(ranked around 10 in our country, U13) and she lost to a girl who just overpowered her. Our opponent just used backspin to force our girl to play a topspin(loads of spin) and counterhit all of them. Our 11 yo girl is just too small yet, she is not able to create much more power, so I thought it would maybe an answer to play slow topspins loaded with SIDESPIN, so the opponent cant kill these shots, or at least makes it harder to kill it. She is able to do sidespin-topspin easily in rally, but i wondering if there is possible to do the same thing against backspin consistently.

If its possible, how can teach it someone? Could you give me some advices?

P.s: sorry for my english, I'm not so good in it, I hope you understood what I tried to explain/ask.



Replies:
Posted By: kenneyy88
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 7:28pm
It is possible to do topsidespin against backspin, but it is maybe harder than regular topspin. Waldner and Kong Linghui did it a lot against choppers. Why didn't the girl just push back and block if they attacked. 


Posted By: pingpongpaddy
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 7:36pm
Originally posted by 33333hhhhh 33333hhhhh wrote:

Hi everyone, I went to a big competition with a 11 yo little girl from my club(ranked around 10 in our country, U13) and she lost to a girl who just overpowered her. Our opponent just used backspin to force our girl to play a topspin(loads of spin) and counterhit all of them. Our 11 yo girl is just too small yet, she is not able to create much more power, so I thought it would maybe an answer to play slow topspins loaded with SIDESPIN, so the opponent cant kill these shots, or at least makes it harder to kill it. She is able to do sidespin-topspin easily in rally, but i wondering if there is possible to do the same thing against backspin consistently. If its possible, how can teach it someone? Could you give me some advices?P.s: sorry for my english, I'm not so good in it, I hope you understood what I tried to explain/ask.

Hi 3h
first its OK to lose even if your girl has a ranking
Second I dont think sidespin-topspin is a particularly good answer to the problem. I think maybe your girl could practice blocking and counterhitting more than big topspin because when you are small your topspin can not be big enough, but with counterhit and block she can use opponents power against them. So learn to hit (not loop) from backspin situation and improve counterhit
Its important to make sure your eleven year old girl ENJOYS playing competition and dont expect her to beat everyone.
good luck

-------------
inactive dotec carbokev

yin he galaxy 1 p
ly

FH moristo sp AX MAX

bh moristo sp ax max


Posted By: assiduous
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 7:39pm
if I win a match by pushing back and blocking i consider that I lost it anyway. It is OK to do it when you are in trouble in the middle of a point but to play a match with that strategy in mind is no way to teach a youngster.
I would rather tell her that's it's ok to lose that match, and just try to vary the placement of the loop. Pick a side that is weaker, pick depth. If she is waiting on the edge of the table waiting to smash, make sure you loop deep, almost on white line. And yes, some sidespin when the ball bounces high enough. It is difficult to use sidespin on low balls.
But the most important thing is to build her character. She should be fearless. If three loops got smacked in a row you loop again, somewhere else, and keep coming and show them you don't doubt yourself. Like ZJK.
Screw the match. Nobody needs to win by chopping.
My opinion. I know for some people winning iss the only thing that counts


-------------
puppy412 : Sorry man, I don't mean to sound disrespectful, but I know that more training will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out


Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 7:59pm
Originally posted by 33333hhhhh 33333hhhhh wrote:

Hi everyone, I went to a big competition with a 11 yo little girl from my club(ranked around 10 in our country, U13) and she lost to a girl who just overpowered her. Our opponent just used backspin to force our girl to play a topspin(loads of spin) and counterhit all of them. Our 11 yo girl is just too small yet, she is not able to create much more power, so I thought it would maybe an answer to play slow topspins loaded with SIDESPIN, so the opponent cant kill these shots, or at least makes it harder to kill it. She is able to do sidespin-topspin easily in rally, but i wondering if there is possible to do the same thing against backspin consistently.

If its possible, how can teach it someone? Could you give me some advices?

P.s: sorry for my english, I'm not so good in it, I hope you understood what I tried to explain/ask.


Most young kids should be taught to counter as fast as possible instead of topspinning as hard as possible, precisely because of their lack of power.  The issue here is not topspin or sidespin, but SPEED.  It doesn't matter how loaded, deep or how much sidespin she can produce with her loops off the push, as long as it's slow it will get attacked. 

She should learn to drive forward at a faster pace against underspin than loading it with spin.  In other words, concentrate her power on producing SPEED instead of spin.  Keep the attacks low and deep, and most importantly, quick.  The key is to concentrate on pushing her opponents away from their established position.  Aim for deep corners and elbow area with quick attacks.  She should also be able to push some of the pushes back very quickly to strategic areas to force a weak opening from her opponents.  It would be unwise to keep attacking deep and low pushes with weak loops where her opponents are waiting.  The key is to outsmart her opponents. 

As to your original question, the answer is her sidespin loops against push will still carry more topspin than sidespin, and it won't be much of a problem for her opponents to attack them if these loops are slow.






-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: DDreamer
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 8:14pm
I wouldn't change a thing. The trouble with so many young female players these days is that they never learn to loop properly. Because they lack strength when they are young, coaches get them to do these awful half-flat half-topspin 'drives' (they are more like flicks IMO) in order to compensate. These shots are far less sound than a proper loop due to the lack of spin/dip and the relatively flat trajectory. If this girl can already loop with a lot of topspin then that is a great thing and you should build on that. Eventually it will become a strong component in her game and it will be something that many of her opponents wont have. In the short term just try to get her to loop as deep as possible. If her loops land deep they should be fairly safe.

I think young kids it is a mistake to train for a match today or next week. Much better to look to the future, kids grow up very fast!    


-------------
I know that faster equipment will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out


Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 8:23pm
Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:

I wouldn't change a thing. The trouble with so many young female players these days is that they never learn to loop properly. Because they lack strength when they are young, coaches get them to do these awful half-flat half-topspin 'drives' (they are more like flicks IMO) in order to compensate. These shots are far less sound than a proper loop due to the lack of spin/dip and the relatively flat trajectory. If your daughter can already loop with a lot of topspin already then that is a great thing and you should build on that. Eventually it will become a strong component in her game and it will be something that many of her opponents wont have. In the short term just try to get her to loop as deep as possible. If her loops land deep they should be fairly safe.

I think young kids it is a mistake to train for a match today or next week. Much better to look to the future, kids grow up very fast!    


Sorry I completely disagree.  Many European players fell for this trap.  The truth is it's far easier to learn to loop "properly" later on than to develop fast and proper footwork at an early age. 

Kids should be trained to play as fast and consistent as possible.  Of course I have seen kids who later could not (or would not) slow down to execute full loops properly when they grew up, but I have seen far more successful ones who've become fast AND powerful later. 

The truth is I have never seen a kid who was slow and powerful and later became FAST and powerful.





 


-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: pingpongpaddy
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 8:32pm
Originally posted by assiduous assiduous wrote:

if I win a match by pushing back and blocking i consider that I lost it anyway. It is OK to do it when you are in trouble in the middle of a point but to play a match with that strategy in mind is no way to teach a youngster.
I would rather tell her that's it's ok to lose that match, and just try to vary the placement of the loop. Pick a side that is weaker, pick depth. If she is waiting on the edge of the table waiting to smash, make sure you loop deep, almost on white line. And yes, some sidespin when the ball bounces high enough. It is difficult to use sidespin on low balls.
But the most important thing is to build her character. She should be fearless. If three loops got smacked in a row you loop again, somewhere else, and keep coming and show them you don't doubt yourself. Like ZJK.
Screw the match. Nobody needs to win by chopping.
My opinion. I know for some people winning iss the only thing that counts

if you read carefully, you'll notice its the opponent who is initiating backspin, so as her best topspin was being killed, I recommend she learns to open from opponents push with a hit or flip As for winning by sometimes playing shots that might be considered boring on this forum, sometimes its necessary I am afraid.
Do you find masudairas blocks boring?


-------------
inactive dotec carbokev

yin he galaxy 1 p
ly

FH moristo sp AX MAX

bh moristo sp ax max


Posted By: Pongz
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 8:32pm
Without actually looking how she actually plays, it is very hard to determine the real problem, imho.. 

If I were you, I will try to improve/analyse in the following priority first:

1. depth: generally deep if what you want, but then low front could be a good variation too.. remember they are junior, so I assume they are not that tall yet..... middle is the easiest one to get smacked...

2. height: keep it low...

3. placement: from which side does the opponent smash more? go to weaker side or vary the placement. If I am not mistaken, Larry Hodges actually advices to try first attack FH - MI - BH combination rather than BH - FH - MI combination... Try and see which ones work..

4. How does your junior attack the backspin? more FH or BH? does she steps around? Which ones that get smashed/blocked more, FH or BH attack? Does she recover after attacking the backspin (maybe she needs to shorten the stroke?) ?

Hopefully by asking these questions, your junior will improve...

Regards


-------------
Butterfly Sardius
FH Donic Barracuda
BH Tibhar MX-P


Posted By: BH-Man
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 8:37pm
3h, that is an option. it is always good to have options. Like RR said, a slow topspin (in this case I would bet lunch that those topspins she made were HIGH)likely NOT landing very deep or shallow is an easy target for a counterdrive winner. I would also wager lunch that that topspin was not extreme heavy spin either. Not many 11 yr old girls can make extreme heavy topspin from an underspin ball.

The answer lies with more variety in spin, height and placement. RR's suggestion of a fast loop with a lower height or better placement with less height and a tad more speed is the way to go for the opener.

I do not see women players here in Korea, except for only the over 2400 USATT crowd,like former elite TT athletes and current coaches, create heavy topspin. The coaches do not teach that to the female players. They train them as counter hitters and hitters. You push to FH, female player is trained to skull-drug crush the daylights outta that ball, period, they have no other thought of making a controlled topspin to setup the next shot. You push a little high to FH side, you know the next shot the female player will attempt. The more consistent ones will severely punish you. Amazingly, these players have trouble with a change of pace shot, like a very deep, heavy spin slow to medium speed topspin loop. They block it out a LOT. If it is high, they will try to hit through it and still often hit it out.

I have not seen many 11 yr old girls make a killer topspin slow or fast loop from an underspin. Many have learned to make a very fast drive against such a ball. That shot, if consistent, is a very difficult shot to cope with, so it is successful at both low and high levels.

Another option to develop is a BH loop. Those can be tough to see the direction, the player keeps position, plus it requires not so much backswing, so it is usually a quicker shot than a FH that requires more backswing.

Female players are usually very quick hitting and ultra consistent players and play very well within that framework. I say having more options is a good thing if one has a way to judge when to use and when to not use a certain shot. Simplicity can be a good thing as it reduces indecision. That is one positive thing about the classic Korean female OX LP BH and inverted FH power hitters. Those players have very little indecision. They know exactly what they want to do when they recognize a shot. Keeping it simple can have its good points as well.

-------------
Korea Foreign Table Tennis Club
Search for us on Facebook: koreaforeignttc


Posted By: DDreamer
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 8:43pm
I don't see how learning to loop properly from a young age can prevent someone learning good footwork.

In my experience those that learn to flick loop really struggle to learn to loop later on because they have to unlearn the dodgy technique of their younger years. This applies to boys as well. Im guessing this flick-loop for the young approach has been quite popular for a decade or so (?) and now you can see its effects when kids get to the 17-20ish age group. Their 'loops' have a very flat trajectory and they really struggle against heavy backspin. There are around half a dozen such kids at my club (2 have trained in China). They have just hit a brick wall and wont get any better unless they do some major deconstructing and reconstructing. A few of the problems are the slappy wrist component of the flick-loop and the lack of legs/body. 

My sons piano teacher reckons that for every hour a kids learns bad technique/fingering it takes 3 hours to unlearn it. Also, try coaching an ex-tennis player and see how tough it is to get them to loop properly. Unlearning shoddy technique can be done but its not the easiest path to travel. Better to learn correctly from day one and have your sights set on the future.


-------------
I know that faster equipment will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out


Posted By: DDreamer
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 8:51pm
Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:



The truth is I have never seen a kid who was slow and powerful and later became FAST and powerful.
I find that extraordinary. In my experience those who DONT learn to loop with power when young frequently end up having piddly loops when they are older. The good loopers have a solid blend of leg/body-strength and arm. If you get power/spin in your loops you can hit as hard and fast as you like. If you dont have the right foundation your loop with be flat and very risky.


-------------
I know that faster equipment will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out


Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 8:55pm
Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:

I don't see how learning to loop properly from a young age can prevent someone learning good footwork.

In my experience those that learn to flick loop really struggle to learn to loop later on because they have to unlearn the dodgy technique of their younger years. This applies to boys as well. Im guessing this flick-loop for the young approach has been quite popular for a decade or so (?) and now you can see its effects when kids get to the 17-20ish age group. Their 'loops' have a very flat trajectory and they really struggle against heavy backspin. There are around half a dozen such kids at my club (2 have trained in China). They have just hit a brick wall and wont get any better unless they do some major deconstructing and reconstructing. A few of the problems are the slappy wrist component of the flick-loop and the lack of legs/body. 

My sons piano teacher reckons that for every hour a kids learns bad technique/fingering it takes 3 hours to unlearn it. Also, try coaching an ex-tennis player and see how tough it is to get them to loop properly. Unlearning shoddy technique can be done but its not the easiest path to travel. Better to learn correctly from day one and have your sights seton the future.


Table tennis requires a player to develop a complete repertoire of techniques.  Looping is simply one of them.  Some kids failed to develop this technique properly but mastered all the others.  It's the same way that many Europeans have mastered this technique but neglected their table game and proper footwork.  You can't simply focus on one aspect of the game at the expense of others.  A balanced approach is required. 




-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: DDreamer
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 9:00pm
Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:


Table tennis requires a player to develop a complete repertoire of techniques.  Looping is simply one of them.  Some kids failed to develop this technique properly but mastered all the others.  It's the same way that many Europeans have mastered this technique but neglected their table game and proper footwork.  You can't simply focus on one aspect of the game at the expense of others.  A balanced approach is required. 

Huh?? Who said anything about ignoring footwork and not having a balanced approach and not learning all of the required skills???

We were talking about the best way to teach looping to youngsters. Your approach may be correct or mine may be. Whichever approach you adopt it is still possible to learn (or neglect) other aspects of the game. What you have written makes no sense.  


-------------
I know that faster equipment will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out


Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 9:00pm
Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:

Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:



The truth is I have never seen a kid who was slow and powerful and later became FAST and powerful.
I find that extraordinary. In my experience those who DONT learn to loop with power when young frequently end up having piddly loops when they are older. The good loopers have a solid blend of leg/body-strength and arm. If you get power/spin in your loops you can hit as hard and fast as you like. If you dont have the right foundation your loop with be flat and very risky.


Not from my experience.  These players who failed to develop powerful loops later are usually dropouts of their excellent early training. 

Current U.S. National Champions Timothy Wang and Lily Zhang were trained with multiballs at blinding speed at a very young age, and yet they were able to learn to loop properly when they grew up.




-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 9:03pm
Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:


Huh?? Who said anything about ignoring footwork and not having a balanced approach and not learning all of the necessary required skills???

We were talking about the best way to teach looping to youngsters. Your approach may be correct or mine may be. Whichever approach you adopt it is still possible to learn (or neglect) other aspects of the game. What you have written makes no sense.  


You said the girl in question should keep doing what she's doing and I disagreed, because even though she could loop her shots are too slow.  Then you got into these "not able to loop properly later" and "take too much effort to unlearn" nonsense.




-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: DDreamer
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 9:09pm
Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:

Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:

Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:



The truth is I have never seen a kid who was slow and powerful and later became FAST and powerful.
I find that extraordinary. In my experience those who DONT learn to loop with power when young frequently end up having piddly loops when they are older. The good loopers have a solid blend of leg/body-strength and arm. If you get power/spin in your loops you can hit as hard and fast as you like. If you dont have the right foundation your loop with be flat and very risky.


Not from my experience.  These players who failed to develop powerful loops later are usually dropouts of their excellent early training. 
I still find it extraordinary that  have never seen a kid who was slow and powerful and later became FAST and powerful. The fact that all of the fast and powerful loopers you have seen learnt via the flick-loop method is just amazing.


-------------
I know that faster equipment will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out


Posted By: DDreamer
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 9:11pm
Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:

Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:


Huh?? Who said anything about ignoring footwork and not having a balanced approach and not learning all of the necessary required skills???

We were talking about the best way to teach looping to youngsters. Your approach may be correct or mine may be. Whichever approach you adopt it is still possible to learn (or neglect) other aspects of the game. What you have written makes no sense.  


You said the girl in question should keep doing what she's doing and I disagreed, because even though she could loop her shots are too slow.  Then you got into these "not able to loop properly later" and "take too much effort to unlearn" nonsense.


How did the talk of a balanced approach and footwork enter a conversation regarding looping? If you were off-topic then just acknowledge it and move on rather than brand someones approach 'nonsense'.


-------------
I know that faster equipment will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out


Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 9:26pm
Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:


I still find it extraordinary that  have never seen a kid who was slow and powerful and later became FAST and powerful. The fact that all of the fast and powerful loopers you have seen learnt via the flick-loop method is just amazing.


Flick and loop and two different things.  A player must be able to do both, as it's not a chicken and egg thing.  However, you can't execute a full loop until you have the opportunity to swing.  Wink  An analogy would be boxing... You can't constantly looking to land a haymaker.  Most points at the highest level will start with a short push or flick, followed by an attack and counter attack (or block).  Looping is simply 20% of a complete game and an extension of all other strokes, as it is a "finishing" stroke.  So you have a choice here to teach your youngsters:  1.  Put 80% of their training on other techniques (serves, pushes, blocks, counters) and 20% on looping.  Or 2.  Make sure they can loop with quality spin at the expense of others (remember 20% means only 12 minutes out of an hour session should be devoted to looping). 

My position is simply the MAJORITY of a kid's training should be focused on everything else but looping, with speed and consistency being the most important.  The young girl in question could probably loop very well, but technically speaking her game is faulty as she could not change her game to play against a particular competitor.




-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 9:30pm
Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:

How did the talk of a balanced approach and footwork enter a conversation regarding looping? If you were off-topic then just acknowledge it and move on rather than brand someones approach 'nonsense'.


It's your belief that those who could flip well at a young age could not loop well later.  It has nothing to do with each other.  Wink






-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: Gauguin
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 10:23pm
This might help!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbB3-0y8QtQ - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbB3-0y8QtQ


Posted By: DDreamer
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 10:28pm
Again: what you are saying regarding a balanced approach to playing is completely irrelevant to what we were talking about. Read back over what was written.

Furthermore, you write:

"So you have a choice here to teach your youngsters:  1.  Put 80% of their training on other techniques (serves, pushes, blocks, counters) and 20% on looping.  Or 2.  Make sure they can loop with quality spin at the expense of others (remember 20% means only 12 minutes out of an hour session should be devoted to looping). "

Where is it written that these are the only 2 options??? Also, why can't you just do number 1 and in that 20% focus on getting them to loop with a technique they will use as developed players?

Getting back to the original topic, the girl in question can already loop with spin anyway. It sounds like she is already on her way to developing a good loop and hence I said suggested just to keep on the path she is on. She can still spend only 20% of her training time practicing looping - but at least she will be working on a stroke she can use as a mature player. 

Also, I was talking about the practice of teaching kids to 'flick-loop' or 'slap-loop' (hitting the ball fairly flat with a lot of wrist) rather than to loop. I was not talking of a regular 'flip' or 'flick'. Of course a flip and a loop are different strokes. I have found that kids who learn the 'flick-loop/slap-loop' method when young can experience difficultly learning how to loop proper when they are older. This is largely due to an over reliance on wrist and flat-contact at the expense of leg/body/arm use and spin production. 




-------------
I know that faster equipment will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out


Posted By: JacekGM
Date Posted: 06/12/2013 at 11:19pm
One thing that can be said here is that the girl should play the way SHE feels most comfortable with, just do it well (should stay with her natural style). 
For example, this can be good pushing, as shown in the long rally link provided above by Gauguin (really cool)Thumbs Up. The coach should teach her to do that whatever shot/tactic really well. 


-------------
(1) Juic SBA (Fl, 85 g) with Bluefire JP3 (red max) on FH and 0.6 mm DR N Desperado on BH; (2) Yinhe T7 (Fl, 87 g) with Bluefire M3 (red 2.0) on FH and 0.6 mm 755 on BH.


Posted By: BH-Man
Date Posted: 06/13/2013 at 1:26am
Haha Jacek, In the DMZ open not so long ago, I was down 0-2 in games and had to change my plying style. I was attacking, missing some and getting blocked or countered for outright points or pressure. I was looping at all speeds and I was still losing points. I likely needed better depth on some of my shots, but I was not likely to fix that then and there, maybe in the future when I get better some more.

I ended up relying on a tactic of pushing his serve deep to his crossover, occasionally to wide wide wide FH to keep him honest and allow him to initiate the attack. I ended up getting a lot of points on missed attacks or it was ME who ended up blocking points for winners or pressure that led to finishing shots! That was likely what he was doing to me the first two games.

I fought back to get to 2-2 and ahead 9-5 and was very unfortunate to have 2 net and outs at match point, a couple of opponent's attacks barely land. bad break, but I had my chances and of all things... PUSHING the ball as first option on serve receive gave me my chances against this opponent who would likely carry a USATT rating of 2050 to 2100.

Pushing is not an illegal shot and deserves some practice as you and RR have mentioned.

I was down and realized my macho all-out attack game was getting me nowhere fast. I tried to have faith and stay with it by focusing more on making a quality shot and vary it, hoping I would make higher percentage of shots, but I wasn't realizing what opponent was doing to me to make my shots lower percentage. I later adjusted, came back from a bad position, got the upper hand in the match and had more than my fair chances to win that match under pressure - the winner was to advance to crossovers. Being in a position to win with a fair chance using whatever tactics were effective to get to that position, what else could I ask for? (besides not having bad luck and/or some bad skill at 9-5)

-------------
Korea Foreign Table Tennis Club
Search for us on Facebook: koreaforeignttc


Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/13/2013 at 1:38am
Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:

Again: what you are saying regarding a balanced approach to playing is completely irrelevant to what we were talking about. Read back over what was written.

Furthermore, you write:

"So you have a choice here to teach your youngsters:  1.  Put 80% of their training on other techniques (serves, pushes, blocks, counters) and 20% on looping.  Or 2.  Make sure they can loop with quality spin at the expense of others (remember 20% means only 12 minutes out of an hour session should be devoted to looping). "

Where is it written that these are the only 2 options??? Also, why can't you just do number 1 and in that 20% focus on getting them to loop with a technique they will use as developed players?

Getting back to the original topic, the girl in question can already loop with spin anyway. It sounds like she is already on her way to developing a good loop and hence I said suggested just to keep on the path she is on. She can still spend only 20% of her training time practicing looping - but at least she will be working on a stroke she can use as a mature player. 

Also, I was talking about the practice of teaching kids to 'flick-loop' or 'slap-loop' (hitting the ball fairly flat with a lot of wrist) rather than to loop. I was not talking of a regular 'flip' or 'flick'. Of course a flip and a loop are different strokes. I have found that kids who learn the 'flick-loop/slap-loop' method when young can experience difficultly learning how to loop proper when they are older. This is largely due to an over reliance on wrist and flat-contact at the expense of leg/body/arm use and spin production. 




Here's what you wrote:

" I wouldn't change a thing. The trouble with so many young female players these days is that they never learn to loop properly. Because they lack strength when they are young, coaches get them to do these awful half-flat half-topspin 'drives' (they are more like flicks IMO) in order to compensate. These shots are far less sound than a proper loop due to the lack of spin/dip and the relatively flat trajectory. If this girl can already loop with a lot of topspin then that is a great thing and you should build on that. Eventually it will become a strong component in her game and it will be something that many of her opponents wont have. In the short term just try to get her to loop as deep as possible. If her loops land deep they should be fairly safe.

I think young kids it is a mistake to train for a match today or next week. Much better to look to the future, kids grow up very fast!"

The main problem with your thinking is you are assuming that other girls at her level don't know how to loop "properly" like her, hence they can't play the same way this girl is playing.  This is complete nonsense.  The other girls above her level surely can play like her if they want to, but they don't because it's a dumb thing to do. 

You further assume if the other girls at or above her level perform a loop, they will loop with a wristy, half-ass motion.  How do you know that?  I am involved in in our training for kids at one of the largest training centers in North America, and we train our young kids to be able to loop 30 times in a row without any problem whatsoever, and many of them are younger than her.  However, at game time we teach them how to win, not how to look pretty.  Most top-level ten year olds can not loop against underspin with enough force AND THEY KNOW IT.  Looping slowly against underspin is to offer up a cream-puff ball to be whacked away, so we teach them how to fake their motions to perform quick flips and fast topspin openings to the main three points on the table:  FH, elbow and BH.  Once they force a low-quality return from their opponents they'd gladly perform a full loop to end the point.

Lastly, you assume this girl's style will give her an advantage once she grows up because you think she will be able to loop better than her peers.  Again, this is also based on your belief that other girls can't loop when they grow up.  This is yet another completely baseless assumption because we are talking about top-ten juniors of an entire country here!  They don't get to that level NOT KNOWING how to loop!  Wink  What they do know is they understand what works and what don't against their opponents in any given match.

 


-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: JacekGM
Date Posted: 06/13/2013 at 7:12pm
Originally posted by BH-Man BH-Man wrote:

Haha Jacek, In the DMZ open not so long ago, I was down 0-2 in games and had to change my plying style. I was attacking, missing some and getting blocked or countered for outright points or pressure. I was looping at all speeds and I was still losing points. I likely needed better depth on some of my shots, but I was not likely to fix that then and there, maybe in the future when I get better some more.

I ended up relying on a tactic of pushing his serve deep to his crossover, occasionally to wide wide wide FH to keep him honest and allow him to initiate the attack. I ended up getting a lot of points on missed attacks or it was ME who ended up blocking points for winners or pressure that led to finishing shots! That was likely what he was doing to me the first two games.

I fought back to get to 2-2 and ahead 9-5 and was very unfortunate to have 2 net and outs at match point, a couple of opponent's attacks barely land. bad break, but I had my chances and of all things... PUSHING the ball as first option on serve receive gave me my chances against this opponent who would likely carry a USATT rating of 2050 to 2100.

Pushing is not an illegal shot and deserves some practice as you and RR have mentioned.

I was down and realized my macho all-out attack game was getting me nowhere fast. I tried to have faith and stay with it by focusing more on making a quality shot and vary it, hoping I would make higher percentage of shots, but I wasn't realizing what opponent was doing to me to make my shots lower percentage. I later adjusted, came back from a bad position, got the upper hand in the match and had more than my fair chances to win that match under pressure - the winner was to advance to crossovers. Being in a position to win with a fair chance using whatever tactics were effective to get to that position, what else could I ask for? (besides not having bad luck and/or some bad skill at 9-5)
Well, at 9:5 it sure hurts... even in the lion's den, as you are... 
I wrote the above from the perspective of trying in the past to coach my daughter. One thing I learned on that occasion was that with young ladies you better be very attentive to how they feel about things... 
I mean, imposing your style - or else - isn't gonna work.
However, what you described is a nice example of how to be smart and flexible in order to improve your chances, and that is still a little different cup of tea...


-------------
(1) Juic SBA (Fl, 85 g) with Bluefire JP3 (red max) on FH and 0.6 mm DR N Desperado on BH; (2) Yinhe T7 (Fl, 87 g) with Bluefire M3 (red 2.0) on FH and 0.6 mm 755 on BH.


Posted By: t64t64t64
Date Posted: 06/14/2013 at 12:39am
Side spin shots are usually wrong learned topspin strokes


Posted By: Imago
Date Posted: 06/14/2013 at 1:20am
Or poorman's topspins.


Posted By: DDreamer
Date Posted: 06/14/2013 at 9:23am
Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:

The main problem with your thinking is you are assuming that other girls at her level don't know how to loop "properly" like her, hence they can't play the same way this girl is playing.  This is complete nonsense.  The other girls above her level surely can play like her if they want to, but they don't because it's a dumb thing to do.  

I do not assume this. How do you assume I assume this? You are just making this up. Please give a quote which shows I assume this. What I did say is that many (not all) female players struggle to learn how to loop properly as they get older if they have learnt the 'slap loop' approach when they are younger. I have come across this often enough, especially with sub-elite juniors but even 2 elite level women I know of also had difficulty. Of course there are players who are able to both slap loop and the loop properly. I never suggested otherwise. Also, it may be a dumb thing to do short term but long term it is not. It depends on where your focus as a coach lies. Some coach to win under 13s, I tend to coach looking ahead to a mature style. Both approaches have their pros and cons. 

Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:


You further assume if the other girls at or above her level perform a loop, they will loop with a wristy, half-ass motion.  How do you know that? 
 
Again please give me a quote where I assumed this. You are making this up. How do I know how Hungarian under 13 girls loop? I did say that many girls these days are taught to do half-flat-half-topspin 'drives' which rely a lot on wrist. This is not an assumption, it is a fact. This approach is extremely common here, especially among the chinese coaches. Whilst this approach no doubt has its positives (especially with very young girls who lack the strength to put spin on their loops) it can, as I have already detailed, have its long term negatives. Of course I am not saying that everyone will experience such difficulties but I have found a good number do. In the case of the girl in question who can already put spin on her loop I suggested she continue on the path she is on. Once she learns to get depth on her loops they will no longer be easy to put away. Also, looping this way does not preclude her from swinging fast. I cannot see how this is bad advice unless you are only concerned with the very short term.


Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:

Lastly, you assume this girl's style will give her an advantage once she grows up because you think she will be able to loop better than her peers.  Again, this is also based on your belief that other girls can't loop when they grow up.  This is yet another completely baseless assumption... 


Again I did not assume this and you are making it up. Please show a quote where I said this.
 How can I possibly know that she will be able to loop better than her peers? I have said that it sounds like she is already learning how to loop properly and she should continue on the same path. Clearly some girls learn to loop very well. What I did say is that quite a number of girls (clearly not all) struggle to learn how to learn how to loop properly and that this is due to them being unable to change from the flatish slap technique they learnt for years when they were younger. This is not a belief or an assumption but a fact.

It is EXTREMELY tedious having to reply to 'assumptions' falsely attributed to me. I have offered an opinion on what I think the girl in question should do and have tried to outline why she should do so. You obviously have a different approach and such an approach of course has its merits. In such discussions it is best to try to be disciplined and stick to what is being said rather than falsely attributing weak and simplistic arguments to others. This will be my last post on this topic.


-------------
I know that faster equipment will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out


Posted By: mhnh007
Date Posted: 06/14/2013 at 9:47am
Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:

Originally posted by 33333hhhhh 33333hhhhh wrote:

Hi everyone, I went to a big competition with a 11 yo little girl from my club(ranked around 10 in our country, U13) and she lost to a girl who just overpowered her. Our opponent just used backspin to force our girl to play a topspin(loads of spin) and counterhit all of them. Our 11 yo girl is just too small yet, she is not able to create much more power, so I thought it would maybe an answer to play slow topspins loaded with SIDESPIN, so the opponent cant kill these shots, or at least makes it harder to kill it. She is able to do sidespin-topspin easily in rally, but i wondering if there is possible to do the same thing against backspin consistently.

If its possible, how can teach it someone? Could you give me some advices?

P.s: sorry for my english, I'm not so good in it, I hope you understood what I tried to explain/ask.


Most young kids should be taught to counter as fast as possible instead of topspinning as hard as possible, precisely because of their lack of power.  The issue here is not topspin or sidespin, but SPEED.  It doesn't matter how loaded, deep or how much sidespin she can produce with her loops off the push, as long as it's slow it will get attacked. 

She should learn to drive forward at a faster pace against underspin than loading it with spin.  In other words, concentrate her power on producing SPEED instead of spin.  Keep the attacks low and deep, and most importantly, quick.  The key is to concentrate on pushing her opponents away from their established position.  Aim for deep corners and elbow area with quick attacks.  She should also be able to push some of the pushes back very quickly to strategic areas to force a weak opening from her opponents.  It would be unwise to keep attacking deep and low pushes with weak loops where her opponents are waiting.  The key is to outsmart her opponents. 

As to your original question, the answer is her sidespin loops against push will still carry more topspin than sidespin, and it won't be much of a problem for her opponents to attack them if these loops are slow.




Very good advice, not just for kids, but for all as well.  There are certain players, who live off slow spinny loop, they give you heavy back spin, and wait for you to open loop, then whamp, they smack it right back with interest.  Against these player, you need to play with speed, and placement rather than spin, deep ball is a must.  I also notice that these players don't like if you change up the tempo of the game, if you can mess around with their timing, they will start to miss, and it's game over for them.  As always, it's easy said than done LOL.


Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/14/2013 at 2:46pm
Originally posted by DDreamer DDreamer wrote:

Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:

The main problem with your thinking is you are assuming that other girls at her level don't know how to loop "properly" like her, hence they can't play the same way this girl is playing.  This is complete nonsense.  The other girls above her level surely can play like her if they want to, but they don't because it's a dumb thing to do.  

I do not assume this. How do you assume I assume this? You are just making this up. Please give a quote which shows I assume this. What I did say is that many (not all) female players struggle to learn how to loop properly as they get older if they have learnt the 'slap loop' approach when they are younger. I have come across this often enough, especially with sub-elite juniors but even 2 elite level women I know of also had difficulty. Of course there are players who are able to both slap loop and the loop properly. I never suggested otherwise. Also, it may be a dumb thing to do short term but long term it is not. It depends on where your focus as a coach lies. Some coach to win under 13s, I tend to coach looking ahead to a mature style. Both approaches have their pros and cons. 

Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:


You further assume if the other girls at or above her level perform a loop, they will loop with a wristy, half-ass motion.  How do you know that? 
 
Again please give me a quote where I assumed this. You are making this up. How do I know how Hungarian under 13 girls loop? I did say that many girls these days are taught to do half-flat-half-topspin 'drives' which rely a lot on wrist. This is not an assumption, it is a fact. This approach is extremely common here, especially among the chinese coaches. Whilst this approach no doubt has its positives (especially with very young girls who lack the strength to put spin on their loops) it can, as I have already detailed, have its long term negatives. Of course I am not saying that everyone will experience such difficulties but I have found a good number do. In the case of the girl in question who can already put spin on her loop I suggested she continue on the path she is on. Once she learns to get depth on her loops they will no longer be easy to put away. Also, looping this way does not preclude her from swinging fast. I cannot see how this is bad advice unless you are only concerned with the very short term.


Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:

Lastly, you assume this girl's style will give her an advantage once she grows up because you think she will be able to loop better than her peers.  Again, this is also based on your belief that other girls can't loop when they grow up.  This is yet another completely baseless assumption... 


Again I did not assume this and you are making it up. Please show a quote where I said this.
 How can I possibly know that she will be able to loop better than her peers? I have said that it sounds like she is already learning how to loop properly and she should continue on the same path. Clearly some girls learn to loop very well. What I did say is that quite a number of girls (clearly not all) struggle to learn how to learn how to loop properly and that this is due to them being unable to change from the flatish slap technique they learnt for years when they were younger. This is not a belief or an assumption but a fact.

It is EXTREMELY tedious having to reply to 'assumptions' falsely attributed to me. I have offered an opinion on what I think the girl in question should do and have tried to outline why she should do so. You obviously have a different approach and such an approach of course has its merits. In such discussions it is best to try to be disciplined and stick to what is being said rather than falsely attributing weak and simplistic arguments to others. This will be my last post on this topic.


I am not making up anything.  Wink

I said this girl is doing it wrong but you said she should keep doing "exactly the same thing" because you know some other kids who can not loop like her.  Am I correct or not?  You further added that many other girls struggle to loop properly, but what does it have to do with what I stated (that all top girls already know how to loop" so your point is irrelevant)?  I clearly stated in my posts that kids who compete at the national level already have many arsenals at their disposal (including loops), and they should do exactly what works in a game, not insisting on offering soft cream puff opening loops against underspin to opponents who can smash them easily.  You don't keep practicing what does not work in an actual match.  You do so in practice and try to refine it until a particular skill is ready, because game time is when you incorporate all your skills at once to defeat your opponent, NOT THE TIME TO PRACTICE.  You are the one who's offering a terrible advice here.  If you acknowledged it that's fine, but you keep doubling down on your mistaken belief that "your" way (keep looping weakly against underspin in actual matches to be destroyed) is also the right way to learn looping, which is not.  Repeatedly looping slowly against heavy push at the cadet level is plainly dumb, because it is useless.  It is much better to push it back strategically and wait for a better ball to attack.  It's all about reading the game. 





-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: Rahul_TT
Date Posted: 06/14/2013 at 3:07pm
Have to say - I completely agree with roundrobin on this topic. Learning to loop consistently with spin is much easier to learn. Also, a loaded slow loop is PURELY TACTICAL play at high level for speed changeup. Not a single player plays like this every rally. In fact, I learnt to loop slowly and loaded with spin and now struggling to adjust to a loop-drive game. I see a lot of teenagers who can drive much better against underspin and I strongly feel that its something that needs super quick feet that can be developed only in childhood.

A loaded, slow topspin is an overrated concept. It's good at lower levels but will usually get you murdered if you use it too often at high levels.  Ask ANY coach - modern game is won on speed. NOT SPIN. And this is consistent knowledge across any coach.


Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/14/2013 at 3:19pm
Originally posted by Rahul_TT Rahul_TT wrote:

Have to say - I completely agree with roundrobin on this topic. Learning to loop consistently with spin is much easier to learn. Also, a loaded slow loop is PURELY TACTICAL play at high level for speed changeup. Not a single player plays like this every rally. In fact, I learnt to loop slowly and loaded with spin and now struggling to adjust to a loop-drive game. I see a lot of teenagers who can drive much better against underspin and I strongly feel that its something that needs super quick feet that can be developed only in childhood.

A loaded, slow topspin is an overrated concept. It's good at lower levels but will usually get you murdered if you use it too often at high levels.  Ask ANY coach - modern game is won on speed. NOT SPIN. And this is consistent knowledge across any coach.


Thanks Rahul... I always try to share my knowledge here in a helpful way, but I know sometimes I came out more condescending than I intended... It's much harder to do it correctly on an internet forum than face to face...





-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: LoopsALot
Date Posted: 06/14/2013 at 4:37pm
I have exactly same problem. I slow loop underspin which works for opponents at my level but higher level players just smash the ball. What to do now? Push? Or practice looping harder? I guess either one is better. I should remove the slow loop from my arsenal. But what f you're already late getting to the ball? Loop, back up and lob?

-------------
729 6030L $18
DHS TG3 NEO $17
Gambler Outlaw $14
USATT 1640


Posted By: roundrobin
Date Posted: 06/14/2013 at 4:50pm
Originally posted by LoopsALot LoopsALot wrote:

I have exactly same problem. I slow loop underspin which works for opponents at my level but higher level players just smash the ball. What to do now? Push? Or practice looping harder? I guess either one is better. I should remove the slow loop from my arsenal. But what f you're already late getting to the ball? Loop, back up and lob?


When you are forced out of position (e.g. late to the ball) your number one priority is to get back in position after the shot, so you should execute the smallest, easiest shot you can perform to ensure proper recovery for the next shot.  So against deep and low pushes that got you out of position, your choice will be either a push or a quick flick.  At the highest level in men's table tennis, however, they will usually go for a point-winning shot in this case because they have the speed and power to do so.  This is why I advise against copying exactly what Ma Long or ZJK does for most forum members.  The key, again, is to understand what YOU should do with the skills you have.  Smile






-------------
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986.
Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association.
My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red



Posted By: Rahul_TT
Date Posted: 06/18/2013 at 11:15am
I like to slow loop under heavy spin - i dont have the power to loop drive heavy underspin. But I make sure my slow loop is low and as deep as possible. Slow loop doesn't necessarily mean a high ball that can be smashed. 

If you are late for a long push, you have already lost the point. Whatever you do, its mostly a lost cause. This is like the question  - how should I return a smash. Well you should be aiming to avoid the smash in the first place. So the only solution is to anticipate and work on your footwork. A push is generally a stroke you should never be late to because the previous shot you made would also be a push (can not be a topspin) and that means that there is no reason for you to be out of position in a push rally.


Posted By: hookumsnivy
Date Posted: 06/18/2013 at 12:00pm
Originally posted by LoopsALot LoopsALot wrote:

I have exactly same problem. I slow loop underspin which works for opponents at my level but higher level players just smash the ball. What to do now? Push? Or practice looping harder? I guess either one is better. I should remove the slow loop from my arsenal. But what f you're already late getting to the ball? Loop, back up and lob?

You shouldn't abandon the slow loop entirely.  Every shot has its place.  It's all about knowing when to use it.  Sometimes you can't loop drive - for instance if you're late, the ball is too low or you're not in the right position.  These are cases where you might consider the slow loop to stay in the point.  Location and depth are critical when slow looping and those all depend on where you opponent is standing.  

There's a guy in my club that eats slow loops to his FH for breakfast unless they are right near the end line deep.  I try my best to avoid that, but if it happens I know to back up.  I can however, slow loop to the wide BH or middle - though not the elbow.


Posted By: tt4me
Date Posted: 06/18/2013 at 12:03pm
Originally posted by 33333hhhhh 33333hhhhh wrote:

She is able to do sidespin-topspin easily in rally, but i wondering if there is possible to do the same thing against backspin consistently.
I would ask just how tall is this girl?  The table is 30 inches high.  The ball will bounce up about another 6 inches. If the girl is tall enough she may be able to loop these balls back because her vertical paddle speed can be high but as one goes past a certain point your paddle speed drops.  On top of that, if one hits a side top spin then usually the ball must be hit where the arm is swinging up and out.  I just can't image a small girl doing this unless she lets the ball drop so she impacts the ball when her paddle is swinging up and out.

When I hit a side top spin, what I call a hook loop, I am usually late and hitting the lower than I usually would.   Because the ball is lower my arm is swinging out and away from my body before it starts to swing up.  I can do this because I am tall.   I can't imagine this being a practical shot for a much smaller 11 year old girl.  Also,  it is hard enough to just loop the back spins back let alone the extra paddle speed it would require hook loop the ball back.   I have done this a few times because I am late but I much prefer to hit the ball at the height where my paddle is moving vertically the fastest to match the back spin. 




-------------
Samsonov Alpha+H3 Neo+802 1.5mm, the Ball Whacker is revived!<br />Samsonov Alpha+H3 Neo+802-40 1.8mm my back up<br />BCX5+H3+802-1 1.8mm New but promising.<br />


Posted By: NextLevel
Date Posted: 06/18/2013 at 5:13pm
Originally posted by tt4me tt4me wrote:

Originally posted by 33333hhhhh 33333hhhhh wrote:

She is able to do sidespin-topspin easily in rally, but i wondering if there is possible to do the same thing against backspin consistently.
I would ask just how tall is this girl?  The table is 30 inches high.  The ball will bounce up about another 6 inches. If the girl is tall enough she may be able to loop these balls back because her vertical paddle speed can be high but as one goes past a certain point your paddle speed drops.  On top of that, if one hits a side top spin then usually the ball must be hit where the arm is swinging up and out.  I just can't image a small girl doing this unless she lets the ball drop so she impacts the ball when her paddle is swinging up and out.

When I hit a side top spin, what I call a hook loop, I am usually late and hitting the lower than I usually would.   Because the ball is lower my arm is swinging out and away from my body before it starts to swing up.  I can do this because I am tall.   I can't imagine this being a practical shot for a much smaller 11 year old girl.  Also,  it is hard enough to just loop the back spins back let alone the extra paddle speed it would require hook loop the ball back.   I have done this a few times because I am late but I much prefer to hit the ball at the height where my paddle is moving vertically the fastest to match the back spin. 


 
This is not quite right.  The part you are forgetting is that sidespin loops against backspin also avoid the axis where the spin is heaviest and therefore do not require as much lift.


-------------
https://youtu.be/jhO4K_yFhh8?t=115" rel="nofollow - I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...


Posted By: tt4me
Date Posted: 06/18/2013 at 5:43pm
Originally posted by NextLevel NextLevel wrote:


This is not quite right.  The part you are forgetting is that sidespin loops against backspin also avoid the axis where the spin is heaviest and therefore do not require as much lift.
I stand corrected but the maximum spin is not at the axis, it is at the equator.




-------------
Samsonov Alpha+H3 Neo+802 1.5mm, the Ball Whacker is revived!<br />Samsonov Alpha+H3 Neo+802-40 1.8mm my back up<br />BCX5+H3+802-1 1.8mm New but promising.<br />


Posted By: NextLevel
Date Posted: 06/18/2013 at 6:20pm
Originally posted by tt4me tt4me wrote:


Originally posted by NextLevel NextLevel wrote:


This is not quite right.  The part you are forgetting is that sidespin loops against backspin also avoid the axis where the spin is heaviest and therefore do not require as much lift.

I stand corrected but the maximum spin is not at the axis, it is at the equator.
I see how my statement can be misread.

-------------
https://youtu.be/jhO4K_yFhh8?t=115" rel="nofollow - I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...


Posted By: smackman
Date Posted: 06/18/2013 at 8:32pm
Hi 33333hhhhh, These sorts of matches are just part of the learning curve for any Jnr (well any player)

1. Video the game and make notes and see what worked and what didn't, and do more of what worked next time.
2. practice against these tactics by getting the coach to do backspin your girl loops and then coach counters and work on power, placement, tactics and recovery to counter their counters etc
3.work on different serve tactics to allow better third ball attacks and reduce getting stuck in pushing game
4. learn pushing game as part of training
5.Get mytt members to argue over nothing
6. Watch other girls play your opponent


-------------
Ulmo Duality,Donic BlueGrip C2 red max ,Yinhe Super Kim Ox Black
NZ table tennis selector, third in the World (plate Doubles)I'm Listed on the ITTF website


Posted By: BH-Man
Date Posted: 06/19/2013 at 7:49pm
Originally posted by roundrobin roundrobin wrote:

So you have a choice here to teach your youngsters:  1.  Put 80% of their training on other techniques (serves, pushes, blocks, counters) and 20% on looping.  Or 2.  Make sure they can loop with quality spin at the expense of others (remember 20% means only 12 minutes out of an hour session should be devoted to looping).  My position is simply the MAJORITY of a kid's training should be focused on everything else but looping, with speed and consistency being the most important.  The young girl in question could probably loop very well, but technically speaking her game is faulty as she could not change her game to play against a particular competitor.


Looked back through the thread again.... and GOTTA give +1 to that. It seems everyone everywhere is so over training the FH topspin at the expense of everything else, like serve, serve receive, middle game, pushing, blocking, tactics.

Just about everywhere you see the greatest majority of time spent drilling different FH shots and combos, almost like the 80% RR mentioned. This is so prevalent in Korea as well. It is bang bang Bang FH FH with some combos or multiball involving BH. Rarely any time on serves, pushes, or avoiding attacks.

The FH shots are the most dominant shot in the game and rightfully deserve a lot of attention, but likely other aspects of the game deserve more attention.

I can see a lot of USATT 1200-1300 lower level div 4 or div 5 city players who can bang the ball back and forth close to table low spin FH to FH forever or rip the loop to loop FH at distance, and are totally clueless on how to receive a serve or read spin in general it will surprise you. That is just an indicator of the average club level training.

of course the elite level athletes identified early in their lives... that is a whole different situation and the thread is addressing that.

-------------
Korea Foreign Table Tennis Club
Search for us on Facebook: koreaforeignttc


Posted By: BH-Man
Date Posted: 06/19/2013 at 7:55pm
Just the inability to be able to push off the bounce and low to a difficult spot sets one up to hung out to dry, especially in doubles. I cannot tell you how many average club level players in doubles recive serve in a manner (like a highish push that lands 1/2 deep right into the FH power zone) that invites a strong and reliable attack form the lowest level of player they have a difficult time missing. Ditto for when you serve and get a long push back, which the same player is indecisive and bumps it back again high and 1/2 deep that gets crushed for a winner over 90%.

Lack of developing other areas of the game have these kind of consequences and failing to address such things is trouble in growing level. Of course elite athletes have no problem of this obvious magnitude, but you get my point.

I think that point is very strongly and clearly expressed by RR and others... and is worthy of re-examination.

-------------
Korea Foreign Table Tennis Club
Search for us on Facebook: koreaforeignttc



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net