Print Page | Close Window

Rasant Powergrip Vs MX-P

Printed From: Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET
Category: Equipment
Forum Name: Equipment
Forum Description: Share your experience and discussions about table tennis equipments.
Moderator: haggisv
Assistant Moderators: position available

URL: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=74905
Printed Date: 04/18/2024 at 9:23pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Rasant Powergrip Vs MX-P
Posted By: t64t64t64
Subject: Rasant Powergrip Vs MX-P
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 7:00am
Hello
is anyone in the forum experience both rubbers?
if yes can you make a small review?
which on throw higher?
which one is more spinny?
which one is faster?
which one is harder.
which one have better control.
which one play better on allwood (which one favor composite blade)

Thank you  :)

-------------
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=61764&PID=734709򳗵



Replies:
Posted By: bptse
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 9:39am
I use both. I actually have an excel chart on this link of my rubber review for Gewo that lists both rubbers http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=74578&title=gewo-nanoflex-hype-forum-testing-and-giveaway" rel="nofollow - http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=74578&title=gewo-nanoflex-hype-forum-testing-and-giveaway
But MXP is noticably higher, faster, and possibly has more spin but it's close on spin. RPG is harder. I can control RPG very well on my Nexy Qabod, even on soft pushes. MXP is bouncier but it wears off quickly. Either that or you just get used to it. I had both rubbers on my Calix 2 (not at the same time) and MXP is noticeably better for flat hitting and smashes. When you slice, brush, or cut the ball it's a very solid heavy feeling (which is good to me). RPG is very smooth when power driving and looping. I'd have to give control edge to RPG. Both are very good on composites. I've never had either on an all wood blade. I did however have the RPG on a soft blade at one time and I hated it. It plays well on more medium/med-hard blades. I hope this helps some.





Posted By: yogi_bear
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 10:51am
Not close. Mxp is way spinnier and much more easier to spin

-------------
Independent online TT Product reviewer of XIOM, STIGA, JOOLA, SANWEI, GEWO, AIR, ITC, APEX, YASAKA and ABROS

ITTF Level 1 Coaching Course Conductor, ITTF Level 1 Coach


Posted By: notfound123
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 11:53am
I have the MXP on one of my backup blades... 

It's plenty fast, almost too fast, but not spinny enough for my liking. I really like it for drives, but I don't feel like it generates enough spin when opening against backspin with a slow loop.

Maybe I am spoiled by the H3 but you guys know of anything else that excels at slow loops? T05? EL-P? MX-S?





Posted By: NextLevel
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 12:25pm
Originally posted by notfound123 notfound123 wrote:

I have the MXP on one of my backup blades... 

It's plenty fast, almost too fast, but not spinny enough for my liking. I really like it for drives, but I don't feel like it generates enough spin when opening against backspin with a slow loop.

Maybe I am spoiled by the H3 but you guys know of anything else that excels at slow loops? T05? EL-P? MX-S?




You may like the Xiom Omega series then, probably Tour.


-------------
https://youtu.be/jhO4K_yFhh8?t=115" rel="nofollow - I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...


Posted By: slevin
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 12:51pm
Originally posted by notfound123 notfound123 wrote:

I have the MXP on one of my backup blades... 

It's plenty fast, almost too fast, but not spinny enough for my liking. I really like it for drives, but I don't feel like it generates enough spin when opening against backspin with a slow loop.

Maybe I am spoiled by the H3 but you guys know of anything else that excels at slow loops? T05? EL-P? MX-S?




I have two older-gen choices:

1. Baracuda: but you may find this lacking in catapault, or not. But if you do, then
2. Rakza 7: trust me - this is basically exactly or almost exactly the same topsheet as Baracuda but with catapault (slightly less than Tenergy 05). Overall hardness is a bit harder than Baracuda (but less than MX-P)

Both are excellent in opening loops as you use sponge to generate spin and it is easy to penetrate sponge to do so.


-------------
Trade feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787" rel="nofollow - http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787


Posted By: ThePongProfessor
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 1:35pm
I agree with bptse's numerical assessment, except that the Powergrip is slightly spinnier once MX-P's honeymoon period is over (MX-P loses its tack pretty quickly, <10h). 

However, and beware: the first MX-P sheet I played with (from Dandoy), clearly contained more booster than subsequent sheets (from tabletennis-point), and was significantly faster and spinnier than the Powergrip. So depending on the batch, your results will vary.      

All in all, I think they are rather similar rubbers with Powergrip having a slightly lower throw but better durability. 


-------------
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/ThePongProfessor

http://mytabletennis.net/forum/feedback-thepongprofessor_topic69419.html" rel="nofollow - Feedback


Posted By: ThePongProfessor
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 1:42pm
@notfound12: I share your frustration wrt MX-P spin, especially after the first 10h or so. I will try out Chinese rubbers for the first time to see if they fit the bill (DHS 8). At the same time, I will be trying out the Xiom Omega V series, so I am encouraged by NL's suggestion. 

Also, I might have to try out Rakza 7 at some point....


-------------
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/ThePongProfessor

http://mytabletennis.net/forum/feedback-thepongprofessor_topic69419.html" rel="nofollow - Feedback


Posted By: Baal
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 2:06pm
Patrick, the variability in the amount of booster that MX-P would come with was annoying to me too.  I am guessing it is largely due to how long it sat around on the shelf before they shipped it to me.  It is part of why I went back to T05. 


Posted By: rickywinataa
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 2:11pm
Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Patrick, the variability in the amount of booster that MX-P would come with was annoying to me too.  I am guessing it is largely due to how long it sat around on the shelf before they shipped it to me.  It is part of why I went back to T05. 

Not to mention the shrinking that happens with evolution series in general. MX-S shrunk on me which is just stupid considering it's not a really porous sponge in the first place 


Posted By: ThePongProfessor
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 2:17pm
Originally posted by rickywinataa rickywinataa wrote:

Originally posted by Baal Baal wrote:

Patrick, the variability in the amount of booster that MX-P would come with was annoying to me too.  I am guessing it is largely due to how long it sat around on the shelf before they shipped it to me.  It is part of why I went back to T05. 

Not to mention the shrinking that happens with evolution series in general. MX-S shrunk on me which is just stupid considering it's not a really porous sponge in the first place 

Hmm. I haven't had any issues with shrinking Ermm 


-------------
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/ThePongProfessor

http://mytabletennis.net/forum/feedback-thepongprofessor_topic69419.html" rel="nofollow - Feedback


Posted By: rocketman222
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 2:29pm
That explains why my first sheet of MX-P played so much better than the second(current) one. The first one definitely had way more spin and felt softer.

-------------
http://www.bladesbycharlie.com/models/hinokighost" rel="nofollow - BBC Hinoki Ghost
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=74126&title=feedback-rocketman222" rel="nofollow - My Feedback


Posted By: anubhav1984
Date Posted: 03/23/2016 at 3:14pm
I have a different opinion about the comparison of RPG and MX-P. I had played with RPG for some time before switching to other rubbers. 

I have played both of these rubbers on Viscaria FL, Silver Tag.

I really loved RPG and for me this is what the comparison looks like -

Hardness --> MX-P > RPG
Speed --> MX-P > RPG
Spin --> MX-P very slightly > RPG (RPG is a monster if you dig into the sponge. MX-P has a superb spin capability right off the topsheet itself)
Throw --> MX-P again, very slightly > RPG (For me, the difference is not very noticeable)
Power in Punch blocks --> RPG > MX-P
Control --> RPG > MX-P (not a huge difference here but RPG is definitely better here)
Flat Hitting --> MX-P >> RPG



-------------
Butterfly Viscaria FL
FH - Undecided
BH - Undecided


Posted By: ahsq
Date Posted: 03/24/2016 at 5:58pm
having owned both rubbers, i'd say RPG for all wood and MXP for carbon. 

MXP beats RPG in all aspect except rubber hardness.


-------------
FS:
Xiom Vega Pro ST 85 grams $80 shipped
Donic Waldner Senso Carbo JO shaped ST $40 shipped



Posted By: Nasche
Date Posted: 05/20/2016 at 2:39am
I agree with pretty much everything was told except one major thing, I actually have a really good time flat hitting with RPG, exactly where two other guys had MX-P >> RPG

Edited: with a medium coach of booster MX-P becomes as good as RPG flat hitting, but I still don't find it better.

I can play with either on my FH, I just find it easier to lift underspin with RPG because the top sheet grabs the ball really well while away from the table MX-P has more power, with RPG you need to put more effort.

On my backhand I like MX-P better, I prefer higher throw rubbers there.


Posted By: meketrefe
Date Posted: 05/20/2016 at 2:55am
the best rubber for flat hitting is tenergy by a long shot.
above all tensors.
then all tensors are pretty much in the same level.


Posted By: Nasche
Date Posted: 05/21/2016 at 1:18pm
Originally posted by meketrefe meketrefe wrote:

the best rubber for flat hitting is tenergy by a long shot.
above all tensors.
then all tensors are pretty much in the same level.

I don't know, I had the opportunity to try T64 and T80 before and I found T64 ok flat hitting on a flexible looping blade while T80 was a lot better looping than flat hitting on this blade.

Today there was a dude with the same blade I was using (Donic Person Power Carbon) and we exchanged it for about twenty minutes so I could try T05 on a blade I'm used and I didn't find it a good flat hitting rubber at all. It's a looping machine, better than any other fast rubber I've tried on slow loops and somewhat as spiny and a bit slower than MX-P and M1 away from the table, but flat hitting spiny balls I got some weird trajectories, something I just overcome with Powergrip or M1 (MX-P sometimes does the same).


Posted By: gekogark1212
Date Posted: 05/21/2016 at 6:13pm
Ummm the Bryce series is the hitting series, Tenergy was always and always has been marketed as the spin series.

Bryce is the best hitting rubber. It is a dead lump of rubber that you just whack with.
Bryce speed also retains this property of dead feeling.

-------------
(\__/)

(='.'=) But there's no sense crying over every mistake,

(")_(") You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.


Posted By: Nasche
Date Posted: 05/21/2016 at 6:36pm
Originally posted by gekogark1212 gekogark1212 wrote:

Ummm the Bryce series is the hitting series, Tenergy was always and always has been marketed as the spin series.

Bryce is the best hitting rubber. It is a dead lump of rubber that you just whack with.
Bryce speed also retains this property of dead feeling.

That is the way I felt it with Tenergies, even if they are fast rubbers.

My Donic PPC has a Rasant Powergrip and the other had T05. In about 20 min I got the follow conclusions:

Speed: RPG ~ T05
Spin: T05 > RPG (close call) *they are both very good grabbing the ball to lift underspin
Throw angle T05 >> RPG , I had to adjust my stroke a fair amount closing the angle
Flat Hitting RPG >> T05 , against a spiny ball I can just hit thru it with RPG and it goes in, with T05 it is better to counter loop

I'm also using MX-P, MX-S and M1. RPG touch is closer to T05 than any of those other rubbers. MX-P is harder, MX-S is really harder and M1 has a different feel, probably the top sheet.








Posted By: SmackDAT
Date Posted: 05/21/2016 at 6:46pm
Originally posted by Nasche Nasche wrote:

Originally posted by gekogark1212 gekogark1212 wrote:

Ummm the Bryce series is the hitting series, Tenergy was always and always has been marketed as the spin series.

Bryce is the best hitting rubber. It is a dead lump of rubber that you just whack with.
Bryce speed also retains this property of dead feeling.


That is the way I felt it with Tenergies, even if they are fast rubbers.

My Donic PPC has a Rasant Powergrip and the other had T05. In about 20 min I got the follow conclusions:

Speed: RPG ~ T05
Spin: T05 > RPG (close call) *they are both very good grabbing the ball to lift underspin
Throw angle T05 >> RPG , I had to adjust my stroke a fair amount closing the angle
Flat Hitting RPG >> T05 against a spiny ball I can just hit thru it with RPG and it goes in, with T05 is better counter looping

I'm also using MX-P, MX-S and M1. RPG touch is closer to T05 than any of those other rubbers. MX-P is harder, MX-S is really harder and M1 has a different feel, probably the top sheet.










How is the durability of Powergrip? Would it be comparable in overall performance to, say MXP?


Posted By: Nasche
Date Posted: 05/21/2016 at 7:17pm
Originally posted by SmackDAT SmackDAT wrote:

How is the durability of Powergrip? Would it be comparable in overall performance to, say MXP?

It's too early to talk about durability, but MXP is faster, harder and has a higher throw.

RPG is somewhat better for slow opening loops loaded of spin and flat hitting, but on power loops MXP may have a tad more spin.

I like them both on my forehand. I prefer RPG looping close to the table and it's also good from mid distance while you have to be careful looping with MXP close to the table, but it's a monster away.

On my backhand I like MXP a lot better, his higher throw and a bit more bounciness helps me a lot when away from the table where I don't have enough technique to clear the net with RPG the way I do with MXP.

Both rubbers block well and are ok pushing. Actively blocking with MXP earns me some points, I just have to be careful or I'll send the ball long.


Posted By: SmackDAT
Date Posted: 05/21/2016 at 7:28pm
Originally posted by Nasche Nasche wrote:

Originally posted by SmackDAT SmackDAT wrote:

How is the durability of Powergrip? Would it be comparable in overall performance to, say MXP?

It's too early to talk about durability, but MXP is faster, harder and has a higher throw.

RPG is somewhat better for slow opening loops loaded of spin and flat hitting, but on power loops MXP may have a tad more spin.

I like them both on my forehand. I prefer RPG looping close to the table and it's also good from mid distance while you have to be careful looping with MXP close to the table, but it's a monster away.

On my backhand I like MXP a lot better, his higher throw and a bit more bounciness helps me a lot when away from the table where I don't have enough technique to clear the net with RPG the way I do with MXP.

Both rubbers block well and are ok pushing. Actively blocking with MXP earns me some points, I just have to be careful or I'll send the ball long.
Nice to hear Nasche,

I was just wondering since I've only played with MX-P and Rakza X out of the newer tensors. I found MX-P on an ALC blade slightly too fast out of the package, and too hard after the booster effect wears out, and Rakza X was way too heavy and hard for my liking, although I could block like a machine. MX-P was a beast on my forehand, I agree, but on my backhand it felt a bit out of place...

Was just thinking if Powergrip would be a good rubber, as I do like low throw rubbers, but not if they're as hard as a brick or super heavy. 


-------------
Zhang Jike ALC AN (88g)
Tenergy 05 Hard (2.1, B)
Tenergy 19 (2.1, R)
https://goo.gl/bFWoxW" rel="nofollow - https://goo.gl/bFWoxW


Posted By: Nasche
Date Posted: 05/21/2016 at 7:39pm
Originally posted by SmackDAT SmackDAT wrote:

Nice to hear Nasche,

I was just wondering since I've only played with MX-P and Rakza X out of the newer tensors. I found MX-P on an ALC blade slightly too fast out of the package, and too hard after the booster effect wears out, and Rakza X was way too heavy and hard for my liking, although I could block like a machine. MX-P was a beast on my forehand, I agree, but on my backhand it felt a bit out of place...

Was just thinking if Powergrip would be a good rubber, as I do like low throw rubbers, but not if they're as hard as a brick or super heavy. 

RPG may be as heavy as MX-P and it's a bit softer for sure. I didn't have the chance to test it on my Viscaria yet, but it plays really well on the Donic blade where I have a Rakza 7 on my backhand and like it, really easy to play with this Rakza on BH (I find it lacks power on my FH), but I can't load it of spin on loops the way I do with MXP on my Viscaria.


Posted By: SmackDAT
Date Posted: 05/21/2016 at 7:43pm
Originally posted by Nasche Nasche wrote:

Originally posted by SmackDAT SmackDAT wrote:

Nice to hear Nasche,

I was just wondering since I've only played with MX-P and Rakza X out of the newer tensors. I found MX-P on an ALC blade slightly too fast out of the package, and too hard after the booster effect wears out, and Rakza X was way too heavy and hard for my liking, although I could block like a machine. MX-P was a beast on my forehand, I agree, but on my backhand it felt a bit out of place...

Was just thinking if Powergrip would be a good rubber, as I do like low throw rubbers, but not if they're as hard as a brick or super heavy. 

RPG may be as heavy as MX-P, it's a bit softer for sure. I didn't have the chance to test it on my Viscaria yet, but it plays really well on the Donic blade where I have a Rakza 7 on my backhand and like it, really easy to play with this Rakza on BH (I find it lacks power on my FH), but I can't load it of spin on loops the way I do with MXP on my Viscaria.
Thanks for the info. My Rakza X with one medium-thin layer of Falco Long weighed 51g, so that's definitely an extreme; I'm sure I could handle Powergrip's weight. I've just seen on other forums where there are claims that Powergrip dies quickly and loses it's grip etc. Do tell me how Powergrip plays on Viscaria though, update me when you can :)


-------------
Zhang Jike ALC AN (88g)
Tenergy 05 Hard (2.1, B)
Tenergy 19 (2.1, R)
https://goo.gl/bFWoxW" rel="nofollow - https://goo.gl/bFWoxW


Posted By: Makelele
Date Posted: 07/02/2016 at 4:56pm
Which one would you guys prefer for "punch" blocking with the backhand? MX-P, Grip or PowerGrip?


Posted By: asifgunz
Date Posted: 07/02/2016 at 5:44pm
The harder rubber would give you easier punch blockability.



-------------


"I do not have any idols. I am my own idol." - Zhang Jike

Feedback: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=71761&PN=1#905629


Posted By: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Date Posted: 07/02/2016 at 6:57pm
http://i.imgur.com/TGa1ADV.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/8ad7R90.jpg

Andro Rasant Powergrip is a 50deg, big pore sponge with a nice soft grippy top sheet that feels a bit plasticy. It comes heavily boosted from the package and drops in performance in the next 2 weeks. Can be easily revived with boosters until the top sheet after months and months of playing loses the rubber feel and starts to feel more like plastic and dead. The soft top sheet allows for opening with banana flips surprisingly well, and chopping on or away off the table is far better achievement than I’ve ever done with Tenergies. It doesn’t bounce as much on low speed possibly due to being 50deg and unfortunately it requires heavy strokes to engage the hard sponge. Opposite what people have said so far I found this rubber better for flat hitting than for looping. It’s the rubber than fixed some issues I had on my backhand due to the low trajectory helping me to keep them on the table instead of arching them up until I fixed my technique. For forehand it requires a really upward motion compared to Tenergy 64. I sold a sheet to a guy who doesn’t play with spin but smashes and uses anti spin on his backhand (he twiddles). He absolutely adores it. While the loopers in our division did not like it as much, since it doesn’t bring nothing new to the table. Good for blocking, far more controllable as it doesn’t bounce on no pace balls, this helps with pushes and near the net play. It’s a bit too reactive to incoming spin unfortunately and requires active stroke and a lot of times very loose wrist depending on what blade you put it on. The top hidden gears are amazing though and you can make a Tenergy opponent tap out on counter loops one after another. That’s when the ball really starts to sink in.

 

I hope this information helps you. I don’t use this rubber anymore and I don’t plan on going back to it as I definitely prefer more looping instead of power loops and smashes. Saying that I am looking for Tenergy 64 alternative as I won’t be spending that much money for a new sheet. Unfortunately, I have not tried the MX-P yet and I have heard from local guys implying it’s also a better smashing / flat hitting rubber than a spinny looper like T05, which goes against what forums and internet says being T05 alternative.     

I'm going to be honest, when I did my testing I was not using the plastic ball which might be a complete game changer. Right now I struggle to spin these balls and I can see how the Rasant PG maybe more suitable, but anything I get for my new setup will be in 1.8mm and just roid it up a bit. So as you see I'm also very interested in this topic since MX-P has been on my list of try rubbers. That or EL-S when its finally available maybe the one. 


Posted By: Nasche
Date Posted: 07/02/2016 at 8:12pm
Originally posted by Makelele Makelele wrote:

Which one would you guys prefer for "punch" blocking with the backhand? MX-P, Grip or PowerGrip?

MX-P and Powergrip are both good for punch blocking. Powergrip is supposed to have a harder sponge (50 vs 47.5), but PG touch feels actually a bit softer than MX-P.

I don't like Grip at all, but it has good control and grip.


-------------
Tibhar Stratus Powerwood
Tibhar Evolution MX-P BH/FH


Posted By: arteepr
Date Posted: 07/03/2016 at 1:27am
For me as backhand rubber for punch blocking style and sometime backhand topspin I prefer MX-P. RPG is too hard and too fast to control sometime.I think it's because of its hardness that's why it need a lot of power to make the ball dig into its sponge to generate the real mechanical grip performance of it. For me RPG is a monster for FH but for BH I still think MX-P is better.

-------------
Blade:Tibhar Fortino Pro ST 87 g
BH:Xiom Vega X
FH:Dianchi Special D provincial
Table tennis lover<3
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=76296" rel="nofollow - Feedback


Posted By: tom
Date Posted: 02/14/2017 at 2:08pm
didn't want to start a new thread on my RPG question:

Ordered a RPG to come a Donic Crest Off (which I find hardish and stiff) a few months ago as FH rubber, having read that it has a  hard sponge and a hard feel overall.  What I know is,  a hard(er) blade  surface is more suitable to engage a hard sponge and hence the combination.  Didn't like the combo, 40+ balls quite often slip.  Many will say it is the technique but I have not ever experience this on any other combo.  Didn't use it for a while then transfer it to Barwell Fleet (hardish and not stiff) - better grip but I still find it not easy to engage and a lot harder to engage than the Airoc M that is on the BH side.  I want to find a good place for the RPG as it is still very new and has good comments here.  Any suggestion for blade combination or views on where / why my previous setups  failed?   I don't want to keep trying without further insight.  Thanks.


Posted By: dangerhow
Date Posted: 02/14/2017 at 8:07pm
Andro Rasant Power Grip vs Tibhar Evolution MX-P

Based on my experience using them :

which on throw higher? 
Andro Rasant Powergrip

which one is more spinny? 
Tibhar Evolution MX-P

which one is faster? 
Andro Rasant Powergrip

which one is harder ? 
Andro Rasant Powergrip. So hard like a wall. The topsheets is harder as MX-P, so does the sponge.
MX-P sponge 47.6 degree, while Powergrip 50 degree

which one have better control ? 
Tibhar Evolution MX-P. Because of its softer sponge and more flexible topsheets

which one play better on allwood (which one favor composite blade) ? 
I said Tibhar Evolution MX-P for both of them. Unless you are using Allround blade.





-------------
Blade : Butterfly Viscaria
FH    : Yinhe Big Dipper
BH    : Palio AK47 Blue


Posted By: tom
Date Posted: 02/15/2017 at 12:54pm
Originally posted by tom tom wrote:

didn't want to start a new thread on my RPG question:

Ordered a RPG to come on a Donic Crest Off (which I find hardish and stiff) a few months ago as FH rubber, having read that it has a  hard sponge and a hard feel overall.  What I know is,  a hard(er) blade  surface is more suitable to engage a hard sponge and hence the combination.  Didn't like the combo, 40+ balls quite often slip.  Many will say it is the technique but I have not ever experience this on any other combo.  Didn't use it for a while then transfer it to Barwell Fleet (hardish and not stiff) - better grip but I still find it not easy to engage and a lot harder to engage than the Airoc M that is on the BH side.  I want to find a good place for the RPG as it is still very new and has good comments here.  Any suggestion for blade combination or views on where / why my previous setups  failed?   I don't want to keep trying without further insight.  Thanks.

Any suggestions?



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net