Print Page | Close Window

DHS W968 1/2/3

Printed From: Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET
Category: General
Forum Name: General
Forum Description: This forum is for general discussions about table tennis.
Moderator: NextLevel
Assistant Moderators: position available

URL: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=93069
Printed Date: 10/02/2023 at 4:33pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: DHS W968 1/2/3
Posted By: liulin04
Subject: DHS W968 1/2/3
Date Posted: 03/24/2023 at 12:28am
I would greatly appreciate if anyone can share some insight into what the differences are between the DHS W968 and the regular retail version of the Hurricane Long 5?  Also, I noticed there are 3 different versions of the W958, according to prott.  There are No.1, No.2, and No.3, and each one seems to be more expensive than the other.  What are the differences between the 3?  Thank you!

-------------
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=35056&PN=14&title=feedback-liulin04" rel="nofollow - My Feedbacks



Replies:
Posted By: dingyibvs
Date Posted: 03/24/2023 at 3:30am
The 968 is a different blade compared to the HL5.  According to Sergio of SDC the HL5 only has carbon + composite fibers in one direction, while in the other direction it's just composite fibers (aramid), with no carbon fibers.  The 968 has carbon/composite both vertically and horizontally.  The layers above the carbon/composite layer is also thicker, while the ayous core is denser with less pores on the 968.  Lastly, the national 968 has a larger head size at 161mm, while the provincial and regular HL5 are at I believe 159mm, which makes the national 968 more head heavy.

In gameplay, the 968 is a lot stiffer, much more crisp which is especially noticeable on the BH side, but has a softer feel.  This is both my personal experience and as described by Sergio.  It's still a rather flexy blade, but you really need excellent technique and a lot of power to access the flex of the 968, whereas it's a lot easier to access with the HL5.  The HL5 really feels like a fast 5-ply wood blade, while the 968 feels like a flexy carbon blade.

To give you a comparison of how different the HL5 is compared to the 968, I played with the Yasaka Sweden Extra for 3 months, then HL5 for 3 months, and now the 968 for almost 2 months.  I'm a FH dominant player, and it took me about two weeks to comfortably transition my FH from the YSE to the HL5.  It's been almost 2 months and I'm finally starting to feel comfortable with my FH with the 968.

As for the 1, 2, 3 blades, the lower single digit numbers are usually ones made for specific players.  They're "player" blades, but for whatever reason weren't selected by the players to actually play with.  The higher numbers are not made for specific players, they're the ones all CNT members have access to if they want to use the 968.

While there's no evidence that the numbers have any correlation with quality, in general the lower the number, the higher the price.  When I bought my national 968 I just picked by weight and thickness.  The lowest number I was offered was in the high teens, but at that point I felt weight and thickness mattered more to me so I ended up picking one that was 92gm and 6mm which happened to be the highest number #33.


-------------
Blade: Hurricane Long 5 (968) FL
FH: D09C max
BH: D09C max


Posted By: liulin04
Date Posted: 03/25/2023 at 12:32am
wow!!!  Thank you so very much for the insight Ding.  I'l definitely take that into consideration when choosing one.  Probably will just get a No. 3 to save some money.  Thank you!

-------------
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=35056&PN=14&title=feedback-liulin04" rel="nofollow - My Feedbacks


Posted By: mykonos96
Date Posted: 03/25/2023 at 9:47am
Originally posted by dingyibvs dingyibvs wrote:

The 968 is a different blade compared to the HL5.  According to Sergio of SDC the HL5 only has carbon + composite fibers in one direction, while in the other direction it's just composite fibers (aramid), with no carbon fibers.  The 968 has carbon/composite both vertically and horizontally.  The layers above the carbon/composite layer is also thicker, while the ayous core is denser with less pores on the 968.  Lastly, the national 968 has a larger head size at 161mm, while the provincial and regular HL5 are at I believe 159mm, which makes the national 968 more head heavy.

In gameplay, the 968 is a lot stiffer, much more crisp which is especially noticeable on the BH side, but has a softer feel.  This is both my personal experience and as described by Sergio.  It's still a rather flexy blade, but you really need excellent technique and a lot of power to access the flex of the 968, whereas it's a lot easier to access with the HL5.  The HL5 really feels like a fast 5-ply wood blade, while the 968 feels like a flexy carbon blade.

To give you a comparison of how different the HL5 is compared to the 968, I played with the Yasaka Sweden Extra for 3 months, then HL5 for 3 months, and now the 968 for almost 2 months.  I'm a FH dominant player, and it took me about two weeks to comfortably transition my FH from the YSE to the HL5.  It's been almost 2 months and I'm finally starting to feel comfortable with my FH with the 968.

As for the 1, 2, 3 blades, the lower single digit numbers are usually ones made for specific players.  They're "player" blades, but for whatever reason weren't selected by the players to actually play with.  The higher numbers are not made for specific players, they're the ones all CNT members have access to if they want to use the 968.

While there's no evidence that the numbers have any correlation with quality, in general the lower the number, the higher the price.  When I bought my national 968 I just picked by weight and thickness.  The lowest number I was offered was in the high teens, but at that point I felt weight and thickness mattered more to me so I ended up picking one that was 92gm and 6mm which happened to be the highest number #33.

What about the x version?


Posted By: dingyibvs
Date Posted: 03/25/2023 at 11:47am
The X version has a thicker core and thinner top veneers, otherwise the same as a regular HL5. 

-------------
Blade: Hurricane Long 5 (968) FL
FH: D09C max
BH: D09C max


Posted By: liulin04
Date Posted: 05/20/2023 at 7:23am
I communicated with the owner of prott to ask him about the significance of the W968 pro versions.  He said all of those w968s uses innerforce like composition, where the composite fibers are closer to the core than the typical blades like Viscaria and such, whose fibers are close to the outer ply.  

As for the 1, 2, and 3.  He said the 1s are harder to obtain while 2 and 3 are much easier to obtain. Composition-wise between 1, 2, and 3 are pretty much the same he said.  He played with many W968s before, just never the number 1s.  When I asked him to compare the W968 to HL5 and Viscaria, he said W968 has very noticeable power than the HL5, and it just can't compare it to the retail ones, just like can't compare apples to oranges.  

He thinks the W968 uses ALC-like composite fibers, although he's not 100% certain.  As for the difference between W968 and Viscaria, he said there is still some difference, but advised to just try it out to know. 



-------------
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=35056&PN=14&title=feedback-liulin04" rel="nofollow - My Feedbacks


Posted By: JustANoob
Date Posted: 05/20/2023 at 2:34pm
Originally posted by liulin04 liulin04 wrote:

to just try it out to know.


LOL "Just try this $300-1000+(if personal) blade, no biggie, and dont forget to check our return policy"



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net