Selling rubber that has been boosted

Whether you think it's good or bad, most rubbers are different after boosting.  They may be stretched, the sponge may be softer, and if the buyer wants to use his own booster am already boosted rubber may react differently than expected.  Some people think certain rubbers are pretty much unplayable unless they are boosted. Some people do it because they want to be "cool".   Some people won't care and some will but in any case it needs to be disclosed.

Some boosters put you right on the edge of VOC or thickness limits for tournaments.  That will depend on how many layers were applied, how much, which booster, which rubber, etc. etc..  So what if someone buys a blade with a heavily boosted rubber, doesn't know about it, and then his racket doesn't pass the check at a tournament or in a league event? People have a right to know if their rubber has been used in accordance with rules. 

I know there is a thread here about whether or not boosting is "legal" but IMHO it is a dumb thread, even though I contributed to its dumbness.  I personally disagree with the rule because it was unneeded, justified at the start by "alternative facts", extremely difficult to enforce and incredibly badly written.  However there is no question at all about what ITTF intended. And what they intended is that people shouldn't boost their rubbers.  Some people feel that it is therefore an ethical imperative and would never knowingly use a boosted rubber.  If they buy a blade with rubber, they have a right to assurance that it was not boosted.