|
|
looping racket angle |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |||
blahness ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/18/2009 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 02/22/2022 at 7:33pm |
||
Can't see the video as the uploader hasn't made it available in all countries... Anyway, there is a closing of the blade angle throughout contact which is evident in all pro swings. There are a few mechanisms, including forearm pronation, shoulder internal rotation, as well as increasing the forward lean (the more you lean forward the more closed the blade angle will be when keeping everything the same).
|
|||
-------
Viscaria FH: Hurricane 8-80 BH: D05 Back to normal shape bats :( |
|||
![]() |
|||
Sponsored Links | |||
![]() |
|||
racquetsforsale ![]() Gold Member ![]() Joined: 10/02/2010 Location: at the table Status: Offline Points: 1268 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Name of video for searching on Youtube for whom the video does not load: Coaching Tips: Table Tennis Forehand Loop (Episode 3)The swing starts from the shoulder and initially looks like he's going to drive or counterhit the ball---the blade angle is noticeably larger than the swing angle and the swing angle is much less than 45 degrees. Mid swing or so, internal rotation of the shoulder and the partial closing of the forearm take over, drastically increasing the steepness of the swing angle, creating the convex shape, and also seemingly merging the swing angle with the blade angle. To me, at least with this swing, it seems like the swing angle increases through the forward swing to approach or match the blade angle, as opposed to the concept of starting with a blade angle larger than the swing angle and gradually reducing the blade angle through the forward swing to approach or match the swing angle. The degree of forearm movement greatly influences the changes in and relationship between swing and blade angles and the swing shape.
Edited by racquetsforsale - 02/22/2022 at 9:25pm |
|||
Commercial unboosted DHS H3 is very playable up to at least the USATT 2000 level. If you feel different, the culprit is either your skills or your blade.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
racquetsforsale ![]() Gold Member ![]() Joined: 10/02/2010 Location: at the table Status: Offline Points: 1268 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Apologies if anyone is upset by my bringing this thread back to life. My 2 cents: The path traced by the center of the blade when looping, as viewed from the top and also from the side, IS curved, but that's just how the arm moves naturally. From the side view, the path will be more concave when the swing is shallower and more convex when the swing is steeper. Again, this happens naturally---it's how your shoulder joint and the rest of your arm move. It's detrimental to proactively effect a concave or convex swing shape. The swing shape is the combined effect of the upper arm swing, forearm and wrist movement, torso movement, direction of weight transfer, contact point on the ball, and direction of shot. Therefore, when discussing this topic, it's important to preface your comments/input by clarifying which component(s) you're talking about or whether you're referring to the whole. "Wrap" the ball with the overall swing shape is a different instruction from "wrap" the ball by pronating the forearm and/or by wrist flexion and/or radial deviation. "Hit into/engage the sponge" via forward weight transfer and/or torso rotation is a different instruction from doing so with the arm. When talking about changes in blade angle during the swing, we must first agree on the starting and end points of the swing being discussed. Players have their own idiosyncrasies and establish the forward approach blade and swing angles at different phases of their swing. Some set it early on, some set it after the forward swing has begun. I think the important questions are 1) During the 3" before, through, and 3"after contact, as viewed from the side, do and by how much the swing angle (as taken from the path of the blade center) and the blade angle change, respectively? 2) Are the swing and blade angles different during this window and if so by how much, and does the difference change or remain the same? 3) Are these angle changes consequential with regard to the short duraction of contact? 4) Are these angle changes execuated proactively by conscious arm/wrist movements?
|
|||
Commercial unboosted DHS H3 is very playable up to at least the USATT 2000 level. If you feel different, the culprit is either your skills or your blade.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
igorponger ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 07/29/2006 Location: Everywhere Status: Offline Points: 3201 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
GIVE UP ALL THE LOOPS . LEARN FORHAND DRIVES INSTEAD.
Japanese coach gave a new destroyer to ITO Mima hands, that is to drive the ball rather than looping. DRIVING the ball with a racket open face. This is the clue to Mima's super_power. Be happy. PS// Go and consult from Youtube video of Mima's training behind closed doors. |
|||
![]() |
|||
zeio ![]() Premier Member ![]() Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 9576 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Been held up by other stuff.
Posting the following just for now. Have quite a few other studies up my sleeve that will end the careers of some members here, especially the aspect of upward, forward, and lateral racket velocities. ![]() https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5950751/?tool=pmcentrez
Edited by zeio - 04/27/2021 at 1:49pm |
|||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
|||
![]() |
|||
Robin.w ![]() Gold Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 12/02/2017 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1296 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
1:The swing path of your racket combines all the movement of your leg, body, elbow, arms, wrist, finger, blade....
2: before contacting the ball you have to go into it in a hitting movement to sink the ball reliably into the sponge (using the body) Above is what exactly the 2 shows . Before contacting the ball there is a hitting movement 3:The traditional topspin/ loop is just what you talking about . We do see lots of wrapping loop in matches . Once a full speed hitting contact the ball and penetrate the sponge, the ball will be at its perk speed leaving your racket, the wrapping will barely have any impact. Edited by Robin.w - 04/11/2021 at 11:42pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
blahness ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/18/2009 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Actually it's neither of the both, before contacting the ball you have to go into it in a hitting movement to sink the ball reliably into the sponge (using the body), hence it will look like 2 pre-contact (but it's achieved with the body and not the arm), then after hitting the ball into the sponge then you need to wrap the ball to ensure max brush so it will look like 1 during and after contact, and it's achieved using pronation/supination... Zeio's diagram perfectly illustrates this.
Edited by blahness - 04/11/2021 at 6:40pm |
|||
-------
Viscaria FH: Hurricane 8-80 BH: D05 Back to normal shape bats :( |
|||
![]() |
|||
Robin.w ![]() Gold Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 12/02/2017 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1296 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() Below is Ma long demonstrating this stroke: Edited by Robin.w - 04/11/2021 at 5:06pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
Robin.w ![]() Gold Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 12/02/2017 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1296 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
This video and another one posted on another thread are not talking about wrapping the ball. Those explain the Chinese drive-loop need more hitting through and the traditional spiny loop needs brushing/wrapping . By the way, Ma long is famous for its curve out topspin. His swing path is on another level : curving out rather than straight and curving in.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
pingpongpaddy ![]() Gold Member ![]() Joined: 06/27/2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1283 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
when coach meng hits the ball for real his stroke is normal and stable. When he shadow strokes he demonstrates something like your theory his japanese mate is the same. He is unfortunately one of those coaches who has not considered that he is trying to teach something that he himself does not do in practice. its a pity because though his heart is in the right place his classes lead people like Blahness who dont have the habit of critically analysing incoming advice right up the garden path into error. Moral:: no matter who advises you, dont forget to use your own ability to think for yourself. here is a real coach. no bs no diagrams. just commonsense chinese olympic coach i played with inverted from 1960' to 1977- lp and tackiness up to 1979 then sp thereafter some tt history:- the modern style of playing with inverted began with hasegawa(1967) bengtssen (1971) when the heavier topspin briefly overcame the chinese sp hitting style of zhuang de dong. In 1977 the chinese recovered their dominance using lp play and looping play to be interrupted by the swedes later on. the first high performance inverted rubbers were sriver, super sriver and mark v which arrived about 1971- 72 btw I can recall doing that same practice that ML demonstrates 4 or 5 times a week with my practice partners in the early 70's. I would have been using mark v 2mm. There was no internet so we learnt the techniques from studying motion analysis photos from butterfly report. In those days we were loop crazy even more than today, partly because at the the time we saw the loop as something that overturned china dominance. We loved the round the net play of Jonyer and Gergely. However the the play of today shows that the fundamentals of tt tactics from china in the 60's - close to the table early striking have reasserted themselves in the advanced topspin of the 21st century we are starting to repeat ourselves. good luck in yr career Edited by pingpongpaddy - 04/11/2021 at 9:11am |
|||
inactive dotec carbokev
yin he galaxy 1 p ly FH moristo sp AX MAX bh moristo sp ax max |
|||
![]() |
|||
blahness ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/18/2009 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
No wonder, you come from the pre-inverted era which explains a lot.... wrapping is not very effective unless it's with modern inverted rubbers. That ML slowmo video is super clear imo, you can see that change in angle easily by him curving the stroke path. It is subtle (ie you have to look for it), but definitely there. Also wrapping the ball is extremely basic Chinese TT looping technique, all the tutorials teach that lol... How about this (watch from 3 mins onwards, and 6:50 onwards for coach Meng's demonstration)
Edited by blahness - 04/11/2021 at 6:35am |
|||
-------
Viscaria FH: Hurricane 8-80 BH: D05 Back to normal shape bats :( |
|||
![]() |
|||
pingpongpaddy ![]() Gold Member ![]() Joined: 06/27/2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1283 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
you can refer to high level players all you want. In the end its what they do that counts not what they say. In watching yr video of ML i see him executing a quality closed racket contact without changing the angle during the contact phase. its worth remembering that not every high level player is also a high level analyst of tt technique whether his own or other peoples. Its worth remembering that the words you read or listen to may have been misinterpreted by you. On the other hand the video of ML represents the truth i am 72 i am no superstar, but back in the days before computer rankings I beat my national ranked no 23. During my career I have had the opportunity to converse with all kinds and levels of players and coaches and the consensus is that the stability of the wrist at the contact phase is vital otherwise errors result. Thus if the arm is swinging through contact at 46 degrees then the whippyness of the wrist should not be changed to 48 degrees. rather it should also be brushing at 46 degrees. Indeed I remember refusing to coach a promising junior because he had similar ideas to you. All the coaches agreed that he had a "wobble" in his stroke at vital moments causing errors but he wouldnt listen to us, so, in spite of his woderful bh he did not progress i watched the video . no wrap. no wobble. Just ML with his very simple excellent no frills technique with racket at same angle through stroke Edited by pingpongpaddy - 04/11/2021 at 6:09am |
|||
inactive dotec carbokev
yin he galaxy 1 p ly FH moristo sp AX MAX bh moristo sp ax max |
|||
![]() |
|||
blahness ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/18/2009 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Umm, all of the super high level players I've played with teaches the wrapping of the ball. Even higher level players like Timo Boll, coach Meng from WRM table tennis channel (ex table tennis champion from China). I'm not sure how high level of a player you can be without understanding the wrapping of the ball. As you can see from the slowmo of Ma Long's loop, he closes the racket angle at contact.
Edited by blahness - 04/11/2021 at 5:11am |
|||
-------
Viscaria FH: Hurricane 8-80 BH: D05 Back to normal shape bats :( |
|||
![]() |
|||
pingpongpaddy ![]() Gold Member ![]() Joined: 06/27/2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1283 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
@blahness
again I would suggest you ask yourself how the ball can be affected by the stroke when not in contact! I wonder if the Flat Earth Society is looking for members? ![]() But seriously look no further than these ideas of yours for lack of progress in your game. Once you start to smell the coffee things will get better |
|||
inactive dotec carbokev
yin he galaxy 1 p ly FH moristo sp AX MAX bh moristo sp ax max |
|||
![]() |
|||
blahness ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/18/2009 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Actually he also curves the stroke path, it is not a straight line. It's easier to see it when it's hooking it, but in fact it is present in every single loop stroke. Watch closely below: |
|||
-------
Viscaria FH: Hurricane 8-80 BH: D05 Back to normal shape bats :( |
|||
![]() |
|||
pingpongpaddy ![]() Gold Member ![]() Joined: 06/27/2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1283 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
@blahness
you need to observe just the millisecond of actual contact to get whats really going on. Its a fundamental of good stroking that the racket angle should be constant through contact. Otherwise errors would result. The "wraparound" exhibited in yr Ma Long example is a function of Ma Long 's follow through which enables him to have good transition (to balance and readiness) by pulling the racket towards his body by folding his elbow. Also in this case the impression of "Wraparound" is exaggerated by his "hooking" the stroke to send the ball wider to the fh. But again this "Hook" does not involve changing the contact angle during the stroke it just means setting the angle before contact. |
|||
inactive dotec carbokev
yin he galaxy 1 p ly FH moristo sp AX MAX bh moristo sp ax max |
|||
![]() |
|||
pingpongpaddy ![]() Gold Member ![]() Joined: 06/27/2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1283 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
@blahness and others,
you need to observe just the millisecond of actual contact to get whats really going on. Ask yourselves if the ball can be affected when the bat is not in contact! About Timo saying "wraparound". does he say specifically WHY he wants the kid to wraparound? I would guess its for reasons of Transition and readiness for next shot. German speakers please help! Its a fundamental of good stroking that the racket angle should be constant through contact. Otherwise errors would result. The "wraparound" exhibited in yr Ma Long example is a function of Ma Long 's follow through which enables him to have good transition (to balance and readiness) by pulling the racket by folding his elbow. Also in this case the impression of "Wraparound" is exaggerated by his "hooking" the stroke to send the ball wider to the fh. But again this "Hook" does not involve changing the contact angle during the stroke it just means setting the angle before contact. Edited by pingpongpaddy - 04/11/2021 at 4:32am |
|||
inactive dotec carbokev
yin he galaxy 1 p ly FH moristo sp AX MAX bh moristo sp ax max |
|||
![]() |
|||
Robin.w ![]() Gold Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 12/02/2017 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1296 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The expert tend to start from the lower position with a lower hand because they have a faster swing speed ( arm, body and leg combined). So when contacting the ball, the racket goes a lot more higher than amature players. Without that speed, most ball will go far out of the table.
Fzd malong training Fan starts with his hand so low but still can overcome the income topspin. It’s easy to figure this out when train with robot. Increase the topspin step by step with you hand starting from same lower position until lose control of the incoming topspin and cannot land the ball on the table ,then try to start from a high position or even from the same height of the income ball
Edited by Robin.w - 04/04/2021 at 10:14pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
blahness ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/18/2009 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Really good diagrams there. I actually had a brief read of the article. One very interesting point was that the experts started their stroke slower than the amateurs and ended their strokes much faster. So actually we don't need to rush the stroke so much. Also it's quite interesting that the experts had quite large strokes!
From the article, the experts also tend to squat lower and hit the ball further from the body (they are more back and to the left relative to the ball)
|
|||
-------
Viscaria FH: Hurricane 8-80 BH: D05 Back to normal shape bats :( |
|||
![]() |
|||
pitigoi ![]() Super Member ![]() Joined: 06/19/2015 Location: Illinois, USA Status: Offline Points: 257 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Looking at the graph, I can see that Singapore novices are really good. I've played only at six clubs, including one in Bonn and one in Hong Kong and the novices have much weirder moves. I consider myself "intermediate" and work on improving my counterhit mechanics 2h/week for months and maybe I achieved the trajectory of the Singapore novice.
I may never be able to get the expert trajectory, but from what I see in the graph, all that the "novice" needs is judge the incoming ball better, followed by more weight transfer and a longer follow-up. Maybe better footwork helps by having the right foot a bit more behind. As for wrap-around, I should try to close the angle during the shot and see what happens. It may improve my shot as in my videos it appears that my paddle's angle is opening slightly and this is definitely bad. |
|||
Right hand: Stiga Allround NCT (74g) /Rasant Grip max/Talon OX red (total 135g)
Left hand, 2020-1: Stiga Allround WRB (67g)/Fastarc G-1 1.8mm/V11 > Extra max 158g Fitness Friendship Fun |
|||
![]() |
|||
zeio ![]() Premier Member ![]() Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 9576 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Racket trajectory of the FH counterhit by Singaporean expert(pro teams and clubs) and novice players(1 hour of playtime per week, w/o formal training) shows that the stroke follows a curved path in the xz, xy, and yz planes. The black bars in Figure 4-6 indicate the racket plane.
Figure 4-6a - plan view(xz plane) Figure 4-6b - side view(xy plane, of interest here) Figure 4-6c - front view(yz plane) Figure 4-6d - 3D T1-T2 - back swing T2-T3 - forward swing T3 - racket-ball contact T3-T4 - follow-through https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Biomechanical-analysis-and-model-development-to-Zhang/7fbcd670e9f3e1c283f9c560323d2c3eadb8c84c ![]() Edited by zeio - 04/04/2021 at 5:48am |
|||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
|||
![]() |
|||
blahness ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/18/2009 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I don't think so, there's plenty of ugly stroke players who wrap the ball very well and rarely miss. But of course with ugly strokes without good body mechanics you won't get any meaningful pace on the ball which makes the spin easy to deal with.
|
|||
-------
Viscaria FH: Hurricane 8-80 BH: D05 Back to normal shape bats :( |
|||
![]() |
|||
blahness ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/18/2009 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Yeah you're already closing your bat angle. Try doing it without "flattening your arm" at the finish, you'll notice a huge reduction in spin/control.
|
|||
-------
Viscaria FH: Hurricane 8-80 BH: D05 Back to normal shape bats :( |
|||
![]() |
|||
kindof99 ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 02/07/2014 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
It is hard to believe in this wrapping technique until you try it. It seems that it is hard to do it, but that is how a lot of high ranking player and professional players are doing it.
And still, a decent forehand drive is required for this wrapping (drive loop) technique. I believe that most people do not have a proper forehand drive to support this technique. If you forehand drive with a relatively closed paddle, it is impossible to hit loop like this.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
obesechopper ![]() Silver Member ![]() Joined: 04/20/2011 Status: Offline Points: 836 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I think we'd need a slow mo explanation video
![]() I just tested my forehand to see how it goes. Now, for mine... it continues on at about / angle, and then when it finishes my arm turns flatter -- and ends up with the paddle face pointing more down toward the floor. Is that an indicator of wrapping, or just wild flapping?
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Tt Gold ![]() Gold Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/22/2014 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 1302 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
https://youtu.be/A9sph_LAb_I
5:00-6.10 Timo boll talking about starting with a more open racket angle and wrapping around the ball. |
|||
![]() |
|||
blahness ![]() Premier Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/18/2009 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
You guys are just not looking at the followthrough smh.... but rather just immediately before/after contact.
|
|||
-------
Viscaria FH: Hurricane 8-80 BH: D05 Back to normal shape bats :( |
|||
![]() |
|||
obesechopper ![]() Silver Member ![]() Joined: 04/20/2011 Status: Offline Points: 836 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I've watched the Ma Long in slow-mo of the slow-mo, and to me it doesn't look like he wraps around when hitting the ball, but more on the follow through. His whole stroke is an arcing motion from beginning to end on that particular point. Maybe in an effort to close down over the incoming top spin, and due to the speed he has to do both changes at the same time. I don't notice this kind of motion/action when the incoming ball has back spin.
So it seems there are two sides. One from the 'physicists' sort, who argue the contact happens so fast it's impossible to 'wrap around' and make a new contact point resulting in any measurable change to the shot. The other is more theoretical and thinks the 'wrapping' action helps with shot consistency and broadens the margin for error. That is, making a wrapping motion with your arm (which is still continuous) as opposed to a straight line swing. To my eyes, if they didn't do any wrapping at all and still managed to contact the ball in the same spot with the same angle - there wouldn't be a noticeable change in the shot, whether they wrapped before or after or not at all. So long as the actual contact was identical. /headscratch
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Tinykin ![]() Platinum Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10/30/2003 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 2325 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Yes the overall aim is to increase consistency. Here is how I tend to describe it. There is a concept in the military called CEP (Circular Error Probable) which is all about precision in striking a target area. If in TT you aim to strike a ball at a particular point on the bat, one can have consistency issues. That is, missing the ball or the ball hits the 'wrong' section of the bat. However, if you mentally broaden that strike area on the bat, CEP, your consistency in actually solidly hitting the ball goes up. That is the aim of the 'wrap around' stroke. I find that it is usually done at distance from the table or when you are not sure of the spin or bounce point of the incoming ball. Liang Jingkun has an exaggerated version that he uses about once per game. With a practice partner, try looping the ball to each other 10 times whilst standing say, 10feet, from the table. You both will naturally do that stroke to widen the desired strike area on the bat.
Edited by Tinykin - 04/02/2021 at 3:09pm |
|||
Vodak 4APC - FH: Butterfly Dignics 09c, BH: Butterfly Dignics 09c
Delusion is an asset |
|||
![]() |
|||
SmileTT ![]() Super Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 04/15/2017 Location: Maryland Status: Offline Points: 232 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Just to contribute another slow-mo video, Ma long does the wrap around loop here at 10s.
https://youtu.be/jOpHKDKk91w?t=10
Not saying whether it has any effect on the ball, perhaps just a way to increase his shot consistency. |
|||
Xiom Omega IV Euro | Freitas ALC | Xiom Omega IV Euro
Feedbacks |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |