|
|
Xiom Jekyll & Hyde Rubbers |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
yogi_bear ![]() Forum Moderator ![]() ![]() Joined: 11/25/2004 Location: Philippines Status: Offline Points: 7029 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 06/15/2022 at 1:58am |
Xiom Jekyll & Hyde 47.5 V Weight: 70 grams uncut Speed: off++ Spin: Very high 47.5 X Weight: 68 grams uncut Speed: off+ Spin: Very high The Jekyll & Hyde series rubbers are the newest
addition to the Xiom line this year. I believe this is the newest generation
among ESN rubbers in the market today. There are lots of variants for the
Jekyll & Series and to be honest it took me a while to fully review all
rubbers since I have both 2.1mm and max thickness rubbers of each variant. I
think I have a total of 2 dozen+ rubbers received. The Jekyll & Hyde
rubbers have quite a strange name for the series. Believe me, I was surprised
when Xiom choose the name since it is quite far from the usual nomenclature for
their rubbers which are mostly taken from the Greek alphabet. I tested the 47.5
X and V versions with the TMXi and Hugo HAL among other blades that I usually
use. Let me just say that some of the ratings that XIom is showing, I will not
agree. I do not agree that the Jekyll & Hyde rubbers are faster than some
of the Omega VII rubbers especially the Hyper and Tour versions. What I have
experienced is different. Based on my opinion, Xiom has designed rubbers
specific for specific type of play. The Jekyll & Hyde series has more
variants compared to the Omega series. It is not just developing rubbers that
are faster and spinnier but for Xiom’s design time, they opted to have rubbers that
fairly easy to use compared to the Omega 7 rubbers that have released before. Both the J&H 47 X and V versions are offensive
rubbers. These are fast rubbers and to a certain degree, both the X and V
versions are both faster than the Omega 7 Pro and Euro rubbers. They seem to
have the same technology and sponge but rather differ in the design. I would
rate the J&H V version to be faster than the X. You can feel the difference
in speed if you use both in the same blade. Since the grip of the rubbers are
more on the grippy and not tacky side, I choose to have the topspin shots that
engage more of the sponge. By compressing more of the sponge, you will
appreciate the speed of both 47.5 J&H variants. Coincidentally, up to a
certain amount of sponge compression, the 47.5 rubbers are easier to increase
or pick up speed compared to their harder variants. I also think the longer pip
structure of the 47.5 X and V rubbers greatly help with the speed. I would put
the speed of the 47.5 both versions to be slightly faster than the Evolution
MX-P rubber. The 47.5 V is both better than the 47.5 X in terms of active
blocking and smashing due to having less spin sensitivity. The 47.5X on the
other hand is much better on spin drives and counter topspins. Both the 47.5 variants
have the least spin sensitivity among all other J&H rubbers. The J&H 47.5 X version is the spinnier one between
the 2 variants. The topsheet is very grippy but it is not tacky at all. Most of
the proper spin generation for both rubbers is that the sponge compression is
needed instead of thinly brushing the ball. The topsheet having longer pip
structure compared to other J&H variants, helps the ball sink more and also
let the topsheet increase the surface area of the ball being grabbed by both
topsheet and sponge. The arc of the 47.5 X is more profound compared to the
47.5 V and if you need more room for error in clearing the net, the 47.5 X is
the rubber you need to choose to loop better. The lower arc of the 47.5 V is
better for players who have opted for a low and sharp arc loop. For short strokes, I have not noticed much the
difference. For pushes for example, both seem to be equally spinny only that
the 47.5V is somewhat a little faster. For drop shots, both are almost the same.
I would recommend both 47.5 variants as a great replacement with the MX-P since
the topsheet looks more durable and with the improved sponge technology and
booster used, especially the 47.5 X, players who are looking for a medium-hard
rubber will like both rubbers. If I were to choose which should be the forehand
and backhand rubber, I guess the 47.5 X for the forehand and 47.5 V for the backhand. The other variants such as 50 and 52.5 versions will be
posted soon. |
|
Independent online TT Product reviewer of XIOM, STIGA, JOOLA, SANWEI, GEWO, AIR, ITC, APEX, YASAKA and ABROS
ITTF Level 1 Coaching Course Conductor, ITTF Level 1 Coach |
|
![]() |
|
Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Kolev ![]() Gold Member ![]() Joined: 10/04/2004 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 1510 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the great review. Is the pip structure what makes the difference between X and V or there is something else?
|
|
Samsonov Force Pro(x2)
FH: D05/H3N Prov BH: V>11/VJ<07 Stiff NovaCell Off/S FH: Rakza Z BH: Dignics 05 |
|
![]() |
|
DonnOlsen ![]() Gold Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 11/15/2008 Location: Maryland, USA Status: Offline Points: 1661 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
I would put the speed of the 47.5 both versions to be slightly faster than the Evolution MX-P rubber. Now that's a statement that catches the eye! To stay within specification, a longer pip must lead to something being thinner, the topsheet or the sponge. Thanks!
|
|
Muhammad Ali reacted to light in 150 milliseconds, near the theoretical limit of human visual reaction time.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |