Ebenholz Review

They cancelled my order as out of stock for the sale stocks. And they give me 15% discount for my alternative order and 10% for the next future order. What is the bad marketing scheme !!!!

Ebenholz revisited  6 months later what are the impressions now are the players who wrote reviews still playing Ebenholz or have they moved on .all comments on this blade welcomed.

chris.b40 wrote: Ebenholz revisited� 6 months later what are the impressions now are the players who wrote reviews still playing Ebenholz or have they moved on .all comments on this blade welcomed.

A friend of mine has bought an Ebenholz VII some months ago, and recently decided to replace the rubbers on it. He's quite upset as he'd discovered the blade surface is uneven - if you place the blade (without rubbers) flat on a table there is a 1-1.5 mm gap between the table and one part of the blade, and so the blade "rocks" on the table. One can even see it when looking at the blade edge ...

So the question is what could have caused this - poor wood quality? Or did he buy a "bad" blade from the outset?

chris.b40 wrote: what seem to me to be warping of the Ebenholz blade may also be a manufacturers fault which i doubt it is because your friend would have noticed� this when h was putting on rubbers the first time,so i think your friend may have stored the blade in too hot a place ie.( the car) sometimes players forget their rackets in the car and during the summer just imagine the temp the car reaches .This is just an example however i think it� is most likely to be a storage prob rather than a manufacturers defect.

He didn't notice anything when he bought the blade - probably too excited to try it :-). And he swears the bat spent most of the non-playing time in a wallet on his desk at the office. I'm inclined to agree with you - he should've checked the blade the moment it arrived.

When I wrote that article Tang Peng was not yet using the Ebenholz blade.

It is the worse blade I ever tried, and believe me I have tried a lot. It is hallow, speedy no spin no feel worse control ever. And the finishing sucks , splinter everywhere it is a 30 usd blade sold for 100 euros , such a shame.

ejmaster wrote: when i first tried the hardwood series i felt quite disappointed.   today i have changed my mind.   i am going to talk about the ebV and rwv not the ebvii or rw vii. I have changed my mind about the v series not the vii series.   these are not blades to get used easy. the grip, the sweet spot, the handling have to be precise and the blade balance need particular technique.   however i understand now why chinese players like them.   once having the precise game to the blade, the feeling is very good. then it goes the smile.   and they allow some game variation that one is going to like with the time. feeling and some particular game based in the difference balance and a more relaxed wrist game.   i like the rwv and the first batches ebv. and they push my game to go higher level paying attention to be more precise.   the pity about the ebenholz is that last series the quality outer went down noticeable.

ejmaster wrote: imo bbkon quite better than the carbo 7.6. the good feeling is in another level. the carbo 7.6 is more balanced but at the time one controls the precise handling about the rw or the ebv (a quality outer one) there is better feeling than in a carbo 7.6. the carbo 7.6 has a hollow blade feeling and also lacks control compared to the eb or rw v.

is it faster than c 7.6?? whats the difference between eb7 and rw7 over c7.6 .just control?

I have a question:
Is there a Ebenholz VII ST with "Classic" word in the lense (above Ebenholz) and another one which is older with "Peter" word?

Edited by Antuan - 10/20/2014 at 2:01pm