|
|
Price of celluloid balls |
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Author | ||
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes, that is a very good description of the Nittaku Premium 40+ Japan: It plays exactly like a celluloid ball would play if it had a diameter 0.4 mm larger.
|
||
Sponsored Links | ||
mts388
Platinum Member Joined: 03/21/2014 Location: Sonora CA Status: Offline Points: 2382 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I just talked to Paddle Palace and the Nittaku premium poly balls won't be shipped for a couple of more weeks. At what point do they go to plan B? A better question is, do they have a plan B?
|
||
roundrobin
Premier Member Joined: 10/02/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4708 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I don't think it matters. The Nittaku Premium plastic ball plays extremely similar to Nittaku Premium celluloid (which is what some people say we should use for this Nationals). Players who want to do well at this Nationals should stick to Nittaku Premium celluloid until the Premium plastic is available. I don't even think there's a problem if most players who are used to the Nittaku Premium celluloid balls are forced to use Nittaku Premium plastic balls for the first time at the Nationals. They are that similar. Edited by roundrobin - 11/03/2014 at 4:49pm |
||
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986. Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association. My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red |
||
Mastermind
Silver Member Joined: 09/16/2009 Status: Offline Points: 948 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This is something new. It would be interesting to know if they are actually made out of celluloid called by a different name. By the way, humble me predicted such a solution long ago . It would be nice if someone could make a video of both balls burning. A kind of a test. Anyway, what we can expect from a 40.2-40.4 mm celluloid ball of equal weight is bad durability. Someone said I believe on this forum that the durability issues were the reason for celluloid balls being made 39.6 mm instead of 40 mm. |
||
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not a bad plan now that I think about it some (training with Nittaku celluloid to prepare for Nittku Premium 40+). Still, it is not exactly like a celluloid because the ball is just a touch larger. It plays like an ever so slightly larger celluloid ball, which means it is pretty easy to accommodate. Nittaku says they are getting the material from a company called Toray Industries. I have no idea what it is but I'm not about to burn one of my 40+ Premium balls to find out. I have absolutely zero reason to believe it is celluloid, among other reasons because it doesn't look like celluloid. Anyone who sees the circular reasoning in a previous post (not RR's) should take it for what it's worth. (The reasoning goes like, "I predicted that this would be a solution, so that must be the solution, and so I will imply that this is the solution and pat myself on the back"). Update on durability of Nittaku Premium 40+. Better than Nittaku SHA. Not that different from celluloid so far, need more time and more balls to be certain. Two of the 2450 players in my club broke one this weekend after about 1.5 hr of play, but they sometimes do that with celluloid too. |
||
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |