|
|
Tibhar Evolution EL-P thread |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||||
Nasche
Super Member Joined: 04/15/2016 Location: Brazil Status: Offline Points: 155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 05/23/2016 at 5:24pm |
|||
There is no EL-P thread on this forum and the available info is so vague and sparse compared to other popular rubbers with complete reviews out there that I'm creating a thread for this rubber. Is it suited for BH and FH? How about the control? Does it have a mid high throw? Is durability good? How about lifting backspin? What kind of blade suits it better, composite or all wood? Edited by Nasche - 05/26/2016 at 8:28pm |
||||
Sponsored Links | ||||
bard romance
Gold Member Joined: 02/18/2016 Location: FL Status: Offline Points: 1185 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
dude just pick a rubber that feels good enough and practice your game lmao
|
||||
Nasche
Super Member Joined: 04/15/2016 Location: Brazil Status: Offline Points: 155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Edited by Nasche - 05/25/2016 at 1:43am |
||||
almanian
Super Member Joined: 10/10/2012 Location: taiwan Status: Offline Points: 124 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
BEST BACKHAND RUBBER
|
||||
slevin
Premier Member Joined: 03/15/2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 3602 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I did not like EL-P. Too hard a topsheet for such a (relatively soft sponge). Result: you need to swing a bit to generate spin but then the rubber is prone to bottoming out. Clearly less spinny than MX-P. Unlike MX-P, EL-P is not that great with plastic ball.
If one wants a fast blocking / hitting BH rubber (like EL-P) but is great in terms of grip with plastic ball (unlike EL-P), I recommend Rakza 9. PM me if you want to buy a new, red, max EL-P sheet. |
||||
Trade feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787 |
||||
NextLevel
Forum Moderator Joined: 12/15/2011 Location: Somewhere Good Status: Offline Points: 14845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Any rubber that suits a brush looper gets a bad review from slevin.
|
||||
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon FH/BH: H3P 41D. Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train... |
||||
Nasche
Super Member Joined: 04/15/2016 Location: Brazil Status: Offline Points: 155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
:-) This is all about playing stile. An allround brush looper, blocker or defender review is likely to provide a different view of the same rubber compared to an offensive player. Edited by Nasche - 06/27/2016 at 1:25pm |
||||
Tibhar Stratus Powerwood
Tibhar Evolution MX-P BH/FH |
||||
slevin
Premier Member Joined: 03/15/2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 3602 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Except that EL-P is not, in any ways, an optimal brush looping rubber with plastic ball (IMHO). It's topsheet is different from MX-P & FX-P (both of which can be used for brush looping). It is less tacky and sometimes the ball slips unless you use sponge for spin. But then if you use sponge, it bottoms out sometimes. For brush looping with plastic ball & with medium / medium-soft rubbers (since you talked about EL-P), you can use Rakza X Soft or Rakza 9 (both of which have sort of hard topsheets but with an emphasis on grip) or the Xiom Omega V Europe or Rasant Grip (which have a soft, grippy topsheet). Of course, you can use sponge as well quite effectively on these rubbers. But if you want to maintain the punching / blocking characteristic that people like in EL-P or T64, I recommend Rakza 9 out of these. There may be other rubbers I haven't used (I haven't tried any Adidas, for example) but these are the ones I recommend from my experience in that hardness category.
Edited by slevin - 05/26/2016 at 1:51pm |
||||
Trade feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787 |
||||
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I actually like MX-P and EL-P, but they are quite different from each other with different strengths and weaknesses. I am used to T05, so the low throw of EL-P bothered me some, more so on my BH than on my FH for some strange reason. But I think both of them are good. If MX-P was just a tiny by softer, I would like it better. If EL-P threw the ball just a tiny bit higher, I would like it better. But both Evolution rubbers are very good IMHO. I like them much much more than any of the Bluefire rubbers I tried or P7 or Rakza.
I don't know much about the other recent ESN rubbers that people like. |
||||
lineup32
Gold Member Joined: 12/06/2012 Location: Calif Status: Offline Points: 1195 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I enjoyed playing with EL-P along with the other evolution series rubbers much to like overall my only negative cost. The evolution series seems to offer a good range for various players to choose from and is widely available on short notice from a variety of vendors around the world, a big plus!!!!
Edited by lineup32 - 05/26/2016 at 5:18pm |
||||
slevin
Premier Member Joined: 03/15/2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 3602 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I forgot to mention one important EL-P attribute in my note above: all that was assuming one plays with a stiff, OFF / OFF+ composite blade. EL-P does not perform well with those.
It works quite well with a soft all-wood blade (in that it does not bottom out as quickly). I have it on my Virtuoso+ and it is good there. It was also decent when I had tried it earlier on a Nittaku Basaltec Outer. |
||||
Trade feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787 |
||||
haggisv
Forum Moderator Dark Knight Joined: 06/28/2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 5110 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I tried it on a Tibhar Samsonov alpha, and it played beautifully, and the throw does not feel low at all, so I agree with slevin that it works well on softer/flexy blades.
|
||||
notfound123
Gold Member Joined: 01/18/2008 Location: MD, USA Status: Offline Points: 1026 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
MXP vs ELP spinwise... which one has more spin on loops/serves/etc? If, in addition to that, someone could compare their spin to the tenergies (05/64), that would be awesome.
|
||||
rickywinataa
Super Member Joined: 02/17/2012 Location: VIC,AU Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
MX-P plays pretty similarly to tenergy 80 although in general it has a totally different feeling. Tenergy feels mushy while MX-P has harder topsheet. EL-P on the other hand is a completely different animal. It plays more like a normal ESN rubber. The closest thing to EL-P for me is probably rasant grip
|
||||
Wolf
Member Joined: 03/13/2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 57 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I played for some time with ELP Max and I liked it at the Stiga Clipper Wood Crest Donic Off. In conjunction with the Clipper Wood played on both sides and also excellent plastic balls. My game is brush loops and felt no shortage of spin and other ailments. Good combo into the middle distance and was not too low in years.
Donic Crest offered more spin and more feeling, I liked it just on the back. W. |
||||
Donic Crest Off
FH-Donic Acuda S2 Max BH-Tibhar ELP 1.9 Donic Crest AR+ FH-Joola Maxxxp 2.0 BH-Joola Rhyzm Tech 2.0 |
||||
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I personally don't go along with the blanket statement the ELP "doesn't work with composite blades". It worked reasonably well for me. If there was no such thing as Tenergy 05 I would probably use it. A lot of this is taste and familiarity. It is quite different from MXP for sure. Both are good.
|
||||
nv42
Super Member Joined: 01/22/2013 Location: india Status: Offline Points: 466 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I feel that an el-p should work well with most blades that have enough flex and dwell. Used it on a tbs and felt decent. Definitely not as powerful as mxp or t05 from a lil far off the table, but good control with some easy spin close to the table. And I found it good enough for brush looping close to the table, while it feels like it might 'bottom out'/ max out on the spin and arc if u go too behind.
But it just dint feel right for my bh, not enough catapult and I felt like I needed to swing more than I do with mxp /t05. |
||||
1.dhs pg2 fl
-FH t05h (max) -BH tibhar genius (max) |
||||
Nasche
Super Member Joined: 04/15/2016 Location: Brazil Status: Offline Points: 155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I've tried EL-P on my Viscaria in place of a MX-S that I didn't enjoy at all. Someone told it reminds Rasant Grip and I think it's more about the touch that really feels close, but EL-P is bouncier with more "life" and higher throw. I believe EL-P is also faster than RG. I started with EL-P on my backhand and it was fine, very good on opening loops and better brush looping than the MX-P that I have on this blade, but I'm a bit used to punch block with MX-P on my backhand so I switched EL-P to forehand and it felt great here. EL-P is slower than MX-P, but it is fast enough, I think faster than MX-S I had before and bouncier for sure. Opening loops where easy and despite a bit less spin on power loops away from the table, it's a LOT better than MX-P flat hitting/smashing so at this moment I have EL-P FH and MX-P BH, let's see if I will keep it this way after some sessions. EL-P seems to have a higher throw than MX-P when brush looping and about the same throw or a tad lower on power loops. Control is good, the touch is good but if the ball goes deep into the sponge the catapult may send it longer than you wish. The bounciness of MX-P seems to be more linear. I think spin on serves is on par with MX-P because I got the same returns serving with either. Good rubber, a bit softer than the other rubbers I'm trying, but it was not tough to adapt. One more thing, I've tried it with celluloid and plastic balls and didn't feel any slippage with either. Edited by Nasche - 06/27/2016 at 1:33pm |
||||
Tibhar Stratus Powerwood
Tibhar Evolution MX-P BH/FH |
||||
seguso
Gold Member Joined: 03/24/2010 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 1619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
EL-P is my forehand rubber of choice. On carbon blades, it is perfect. The topsheet is a bit softer than T05, the sponge is more porous so it plays completely different (feels harder at low power, and then suddenly softer).
The rubber is rather slow, much less catapult than t05, but on carbon it becomes rather fast (in particular it becomes faster than MX-P). On carbon, I can't find a problem in the rubber, (after using it for 4 months including many competitions) so I am not trying anything else. (If I did find a problem with it, I would try rasant turbo). the rubber is not particularly spinny, and is rather slow, but excels in control. For backhand, I feel it is too hard, and I prefer fx-p there. make sure you boost el-p with a good booster (I use seamon, better than falco long) and you stretch the rubber about 1cm when you glue it. Edited by seguso - 06/21/2016 at 5:25am |
||||
pg5x - mxd fh & bh - 2015 video
|
||||
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Nice description. I only play with ALC blades, but this is pretty much how it seemed to me on my FH. I found it kind of strange on my BH, and there T05 works better for me. I still use T05 both sides. |
||||
Nasche
Super Member Joined: 04/15/2016 Location: Brazil Status: Offline Points: 155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Hi Seguso. Did you mean better with this rubber or overall? Can you elaborate please? |
||||
Tibhar Stratus Powerwood
Tibhar Evolution MX-P BH/FH |
||||
DocWilly
Beginner Joined: 03/27/2016 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Can anyone compare EL-P to Vega Pro?
|
||||
seguso
Gold Member Joined: 03/24/2010 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 1619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I too play with ALC (Pg-12). Saying "carbon" I was including alc. Off topic: Baal, since I recall you are *the* autorithy on viscaria and ALC, :) do you happen to know if galaxy/yinhe venus-14 is close to viscaria and tb alc? I've seen pictures and it's the same thickness and construction. Edited by seguso - 06/22/2016 at 3:21am |
||||
pg5x - mxd fh & bh - 2015 video
|
||||
seguso
Gold Member Joined: 03/24/2010 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 1619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
overall. seamoon is a lot faster. falco long does not seem to do much. (I use only one layer because otherwise the arc becomes too much and I can't glue.) |
||||
pg5x - mxd fh & bh - 2015 video
|
||||
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Sorry seguso. I've never tried one of those.
|
||||
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Member Joined: 06/12/2016 Location: Gaza Strip Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Can I get a quick description against Bluefire JP series? Was reading about these rubbers earlier and I heard mixed opinions. I feel like Donic Bluefire JP01 in 1.8mm might be the rubber for me, coming from a Tenergy 64 test blade. It seems to tick the right boxes, soft top sheet, around 47deg hardness, small porous sponge. Give it a bit of a boost and it should reach the 64 speed. Hmmm, or should I look else where like Rasant Grip and EL-P? I just don't want to spend the money for a Tenergy if I can help it.
|
||||
seguso
Gold Member Joined: 03/24/2010 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 1619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
bluefire jp series: the non porous sponge make them slow (much slower than bluefire M series), the softer topsheet make them lower throw than the bluefire M series. Also, bluefire JP are lower throw than evolution -P series. they are like the evolution -S series. The speed of bluefire jp01 is less than bluefire M1 and M2, more or less equal to el-p and mx-p. it makes no sense IMHO to get jp01 less than max, because as I said it is slow. even on backhand. if you must go JP, then probably jp02 is closer to t64 in hardness. But fx-p is more similar imho to t64 than any donic rubber. Fx-p is high throw, linear and fast. |
||||
pg5x - mxd fh & bh - 2015 video
|
||||
slevin
Premier Member Joined: 03/15/2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 3602 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
T64 is great for punching. Is FX-P good for punching (Never tried. I have 2 FX-P at home. Am hesitant to try because of this). I thought that JP02 would be more like T64 as it is similar in hardness, throw and pace.
|
||||
Trade feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787 |
||||
seguso
Gold Member Joined: 03/24/2010 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 1619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
jp02 is slower and much lower throw than t64. fxp is faster and higher throw, more like t64. (though still a bit softer and slower than t64 I guess)
punching is ok with fx-p. (unlike, say, m2 or m3), though it is not a shot that I do. of course it won't be as good as acuda in that. Edited by seguso - 06/26/2016 at 3:36am |
||||
pg5x - mxd fh & bh - 2015 video
|
||||
4ugustu
Super Member Joined: 12/31/2010 Location: Brazil Status: Offline Points: 121 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
fxp is faster than jp02? :O
|
||||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |