| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
SmackDAT 
Platinum Member
Joined: 01/01/2012
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2231
|
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote  Reply
 Posted: 10/20/2018 at 10:09am |
 osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
[QUOTE=osmar92]ok that implies you have no idea how it affects pips or anti
|
Calm down and adapt, if you can't calm down then stop talking trash, because your voice will not be heard |
your great advise is to change the style from bh chop blocker to an attacker? |
Adapt to lower spin capabilities my friend, find different tactics and stop relying on spin so much
Adapt, not change |
I believe I said earlier that this ball negates the main property of anti. That means the rubber is no longer an instrument but the ballast and there is no way to adapt it generates flat ball as opposed to underspin on chop blocks. Adapt one can do with inverted rubber to lesser spin but with anti it becomes not anti but similar to worn inverted, completely different style, let alone that I have beem adapting to all the changes all my over 40 years of playing. Do you follow now?
|
The ball doesn't reduce spin significantly at all, in my eyes.
Don't know if anyone else would second this? |
did I say significantly? it should not be significantly to affect the game, lp and slick pips it affects to detriment |
Ubiquitously non significant, you're contradicting yourself
You say it's affecting you to detriment, but you denying its significance, which is what I'm saying |
you dont get it. ball affects not significantly spin of inverted rubber , to this one can adapt. With anti no adaptation caz it can change style drastically or moreover one must abandon anti caz it does not perform as designed |
Change style slightly |
impossible, one should abandon anti then |
False?
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
osmar92
Super Member
Joined: 02/14/2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 369
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10/20/2018 at 11:16am |
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
[QUOTE=osmar92]ok that implies you have no idea how it affects pips or anti
|
Calm down and adapt, if you can't calm down then stop talking trash, because your voice will not be heard |
your great advise is to change the style from bh chop blocker to an attacker? |
Adapt to lower spin capabilities my friend, find different tactics and stop relying on spin so much
Adapt, not change |
I believe I said earlier that this ball negates the main property of anti. That means the rubber is no longer an instrument but the ballast and there is no way to adapt it generates flat ball as opposed to underspin on chop blocks. Adapt one can do with inverted rubber to lesser spin but with anti it becomes not anti but similar to worn inverted, completely different style, let alone that I have beem adapting to all the changes all my over 40 years of playing. Do you follow now?
|
The ball doesn't reduce spin significantly at all, in my eyes.
Don't know if anyone else would second this? |
did I say significantly? it should not be significantly to affect the game, lp and slick pips it affects to detriment |
Ubiquitously non significant, you're contradicting yourself
You say it's affecting you to detriment, but you denying its significance, which is what I'm saying |
you dont get it. ball affects not significantly spin of inverted rubber , to this one can adapt. With anti no adaptation caz it can change style drastically or moreover one must abandon anti caz it does not perform as designed |
Change style slightly |
impossible, one should abandon anti then |
False? |
question mark or statement, if statement then prove it. I play with anti so I can share what I experience, what about you? trolling?
|
|
SmackDAT
Platinum Member
Joined: 01/01/2012
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2231
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10/20/2018 at 11:35am |
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
osmar92 wrote:
SmackDAT wrote:
[QUOTE=osmar92]ok that implies you have no idea how it affects pips or anti
|
Calm down and adapt, if you can't calm down then stop talking trash, because your voice will not be heard |
your great advise is to change the style from bh chop blocker to an attacker? |
Adapt to lower spin capabilities my friend, find different tactics and stop relying on spin so much
Adapt, not change |
I believe I said earlier that this ball negates the main property of anti. That means the rubber is no longer an instrument but the ballast and there is no way to adapt it generates flat ball as opposed to underspin on chop blocks. Adapt one can do with inverted rubber to lesser spin but with anti it becomes not anti but similar to worn inverted, completely different style, let alone that I have beem adapting to all the changes all my over 40 years of playing. Do you follow now?
|
The ball doesn't reduce spin significantly at all, in my eyes.
Don't know if anyone else would second this? |
did I say significantly? it should not be significantly to affect the game, lp and slick pips it affects to detriment |
Ubiquitously non significant, you're contradicting yourself
You say it's affecting you to detriment, but you denying its significance, which is what I'm saying |
you dont get it. ball affects not significantly spin of inverted rubber , to this one can adapt. With anti no adaptation caz it can change style drastically or moreover one must abandon anti caz it does not perform as designed |
Change style slightly |
impossible, one should abandon anti then |
False? |
question mark or statement, if statement then prove it. I play with anti so I can share what I experience, what about you? trolling? |
Why are you so angry? Have you not taken Baal's advice to switch anti?
|
|
|
|
osmar92
Super Member
Joined: 02/14/2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 369
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10/20/2018 at 12:32pm |
|
I am not angry, I just don't understand why one needs to answer or suggest without having an experience. Obvious answers no one needs.
|
|
Tweet
