Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Ma Long serve training
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Ma Long serve training

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
kenneyy88 View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 01/06/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4074
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kenneyy88 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/23/2010 at 8:09pm
great serves, interesting motion after contact.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Jonan View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 02/18/2009
Location: Elsweyr
Status: Offline
Points: 2933
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jonan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/23/2010 at 8:37pm
I'd also like to point out his toss. It leaves his hand well above his head, and you can tell from the way the hand tilts that he puts spin on it. His quick upward motion that sweeps back over his head keeps it in his hand until it tips and puts the spin on it. So he puts spin on it and contacts it after it drops below where it left his hand.
Back to Top
petermoo View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/13/2003
Location: Jamaica
Status: Offline
Points: 651
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote petermoo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/23/2010 at 8:39pm
Fantastic serves!
Thanks for posting. It really is a great privilege to watch a player vastly superior to myself revealed in slow mo!
I dont know how good some of the people here are criticizing Ma Longs serves, but it would be interesting if they could post some videos of their serves so I could learn how to serve even better than Ma Long!
I watched each serves and I think they are all perfectly legal. The ball is never obscured at any stage from the receiver as far as I can see.
Petermoo
Back to Top
takaaki View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member


Joined: 05/07/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote takaaki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/23/2010 at 10:55pm
actually, the discussion is mainly about one serve in particular, the slo-mo at 1:25.

as far as i can see, the serve is technically illegal.  i say "technically" because the moment of contact is perfectly visible at this camera angle, which is basically the same view that a righthander standing at his backhand would have.

that said, there are 2 things wrong here:  firstly, the ball passes behind his head for brief moment before the moment of contact and secondly, his free hand appears to be between the ball and the net at the moment of contact. 

now, the hand being where it is would obscure the ball from the view of a lefthander standing at his backhand side.

so, if i were an ump, i would not say anything if he were playing a righthander.  even though the ball passing behind the head is illegal, i wouldn't care, as long as the moment of contact is visible, which is really, in my mind, the most important thing.

but if his opponent was a lefthander (and not a teammate, who, one could safely assume, is used to his serves) then i would issue a warning for him to drop the hand faster so that the ball wouldn't pass behind it as it appears to do, at least to me, in this vid.
Back to Top
FireHorse View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 09/05/2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 567
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FireHorse Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/23/2010 at 11:25pm
I would like to say that it is a nice video that captures Ma Long's serve practice.  I particularly find one particular serve that I think it's illegal but I don't want to get into the debate if it's legal or not.  I only want to say that the no-hidden serve rule is not really followed and enforced so sometimes, there are some hidden serves going on during tournaments, so I hope that ITTF will decide to change that rule.

I will stop here about this matter and enjoy the video more to learn from Ma Long.

FireHorse




Current Setup:
Butterfly Primorac Carbon
FH: Andro Rassant Grip
BH: Andro Rassant PowerGrip
Back to Top
stiltt View Drop Down
Assistant Admin
Assistant Admin
Avatar

Joined: 07/15/2007
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stiltt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/23/2010 at 11:47pm
is it fair to say that it is easier for #1 in the world to cross borderline more often without being called?
that's what an intelligent player will do to stay at the top.
I do not believe being totally 100% fair will help you to stay at or even reach the top.
I am ashamed at what I just wrote as it could be considered as an excuse to have an ongoing cheating spirit. I will not edit it because it's a reality: at the top level they will try to stay on borderline because that's where things happen.
It reminds me that theory (I do not know if it's right or wrong but I sure like it) that says we should take enough risks to evolve to ensure survival for our genes but not too many in order not to die from  too much...evolution baldness.
JUST STAY ON THE EDGE BABY!!!


Back to Top
JKC View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/12/2006
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1625
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JKC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2010 at 3:17am
When someone foul serves, I always consider whether they are trying to gain an advantage from doing it. In this case ML is clearly trying to gain an advantage by serving in this way. If I was the umpire I would be pulling him up for this serve (if I had the slo-mo replay - which umpires don't). As I am unlikely to be umpiring for him and I doubt whether he would use this serve in a match, I don't think he has a lot to worry about.
Back to Top
stiltt View Drop Down
Assistant Admin
Assistant Admin
Avatar

Joined: 07/15/2007
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stiltt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2010 at 3:44am
Originally posted by JKC JKC wrote:


In this case ML is clearly trying to gain an advantage by serving in this way...

 I don't think he has a lot to worry about.



yeah man! at any level you got it right.

He is just playing on his edge and of course he is able to back off a bit when called.

What I am sure about is since he is on that edge even if he wants to be legal all the time, he regularly won't just because of his will to stay borderline: the little lag between the player's will to be legal and his body not to follow exactly all the time will create a problem.
I bet it is really hard to judge those people's way in a live situation (DUH!)

Back to Top
BMonkey View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/28/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1015
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BMonkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2010 at 11:14am
Originally posted by JKC JKC wrote:

When someone foul serves, I always consider whether they are trying to gain an advantage from doing it. In this case ML is clearly trying to gain an advantage by serving in this way. If I was the umpire I would be pulling him up for this serve (if I had the slo-mo replay - which umpires don't). As I am unlikely to be umpiring for him and I doubt whether he would use this serve in a match, I don't think he has a lot to worry about.
I would fault him instead everytime he did a backhand serve. That'll show him! LOL
Back to Top
fiveplyian View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 10/10/2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fiveplyian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2010 at 12:42pm
Originally posted by JKC JKC wrote:

It doesn't matter whether the ball is visible to a right hander or to the camera, the fact is that his hand not removed as soon as the ball is projected. In fact it is still in this space at the time of contact. Just pause the vid at the correct time and it is obvious. 
 
2.06.05  As soon as the ball has been projected, the server�s free arm and hand shall be removed from the space between the ball and the net.
 
I also agree that the rule can't be (or just isn't) enforced so might as well be dropped.
 
Has anyone seen any guidance as to what the above actually means. What is 'the space' between the ball and the net ? I couldn't find any umpires guidance on it.
 
If the ball is above my head and I draw a line from ball to top of net then is 'the space' everything above this line ? This seems to be how umpires interpret it as several pros just track their arm down below the 'ball to net line' so their arm is never in this definition of space.
 
If 'the space' is defined as everything between vertical plane of ball and vertical plane of net then its not remotely enforced.
 
P.S. This was the second, revised wording of this particular new rule wasn't it ? or do I remember incorrectly ?
Ian
Back to Top
APW46 View Drop Down
Assistant Moderator
Assistant Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 02/02/2009
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote APW46 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2010 at 6:52pm
Top players play 'on the edge' of legality. Strictly speaking these serves may be judged by some to be illegal, the free arm is supposed to be moved clear of vision 'as soon as possible'  in this case it is not. You rarely see top players faulted though, the umpires are scared, Damien Elois has been serving the most foul serves ever seen to man for years (thrown backwards on to his bat)
The Older I get, The better I was.
Back to Top
Dagoboz View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member
Avatar

Joined: 09/12/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 199
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dagoboz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2010 at 7:14pm
Originally posted by fiveplyian fiveplyian wrote:

Originally posted by JKC JKC wrote:

It doesn't matter whether the ball is visible to a right hander or to the camera, the fact is that his hand not removed as soon as the ball is projected. In fact it is still in this space at the time of contact. Just pause the vid at the correct time and it is obvious. 
 
2.06.05  As soon as the ball has been projected, the server�s free arm and hand shall be removed from the space between the ball and the net.
 
I also agree that the rule can't be (or just isn't) enforced so might as well be dropped.
 
Has anyone seen any guidance as to what the above actually means. What is 'the space' between the ball and the net ? I couldn't find any umpires guidance on it.
 
If the ball is above my head and I draw a line from ball to top of net then is 'the space' everything above this line ? This seems to be how umpires interpret it as several pros just track their arm down below the 'ball to net line' so their arm is never in this definition of space.
 
If 'the space' is defined as everything between vertical plane of ball and vertical plane of net then its not remotely enforced.
 
P.S. This was the second, revised wording of this particular new rule wasn't it ? or do I remember incorrectly ?
Well ya, this:
2.6.5 As soon as the ball has been projected, the server�s free arm and hand shall be removed from the space between the ball and the net. The space between the ball and the net is defined by the ball, the net and its indefinite upward extension.
 
The rules of serve, player developement, coaching and enforcement by umpires are all very problematic in this sport. For example, alot of people like to consider if an illegal serve gives the server an "advantage" and feel that unless a player gains an advantage then an umpire should not be bothered to call an illegal serve. Witness the US Open last summer. I have done a word search of
 
 
and I cannot find the word "advantage".
 
I think it is interesting how the rules of serve reference the umpire of a match. After the ball has been struck during the serve play may only proceed if the umpire is "satisfied", not the server, not the reciever, not the audience and not the forum members, but the umpire himself. There may be times when the umpire is "doubtful of the legality of a service" or times when the umpire regards a serve as a "clear failure to comply with the requirements for a correct service". That leaves us with 3 possibilities:
 
a satisfied umpire
an unsure umpire
a clearly convinced of failure umpire
 
The first option bodes well for the server but the last two options do not. The last two options are the fault of the server not the umpire and should have nothing to do with "advantage".
 
 
 
Blade: Maze
FH: Something
BH: Something Else
Back to Top
johnny89atc View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 06/28/2008
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1600
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote johnny89atc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2010 at 7:18pm
I remember that Adam Sharara said in a thread about  serving that Ma Long pushes the rules of legal serving to their limits more than any other player...
Blade: OSP Virtuoso-L RST 87gr
FH: Butterfly Tenergy 05 FX 2.1
BH: Butterfly Tenergy 05 1.9
Back to Top
ZingyDNA View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 09/19/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 2373
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ZingyDNA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2010 at 8:08pm
Originally posted by johnny89atc johnny89atc wrote:

I remember that Adam Sharara said in a thread about  serving that Ma Long pushes the rules of legal serving to their limits more than any other player...


Yes, the ITTF president singled him out, no wonder he frequently gets faulted even when he serves legally. I guess the refs got the memo...
Back to Top
APW46 View Drop Down
Assistant Moderator
Assistant Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 02/02/2009
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote APW46 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2010 at 8:30pm
The ITTF do not care about Us, they bring in rules that can only possibly be enforced in top Pro competition, I have had many emails with Adham, he is a good guy, but the ITTF  make a clear distinction between what it deems as as international pro players and Us lot, we don't register, we are nothing, there is no distinction in the eyes of the ITTF between YOU, and a casual player who books a table at a leisure centre.
The Older I get, The better I was.
Back to Top
takaaki View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member


Joined: 05/07/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote takaaki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/25/2010 at 12:10am
Originally posted by APW46 APW46 wrote:

The ITTF do not care about Us, they bring in rules that can only possibly be enforced in top Pro competition, I have had many emails with Adham, he is a good guy, but the ITTF  make a clear distinction between what it deems as as international pro players and Us lot, we don't register, we are nothing, there is no distinction in the eyes of the ITTF between YOU, and a casual player who books a table at a leisure centre.


the ittf writes the rules for their events.  it's up to individual countries to decide if they themselves want to adopt those rules for their events as well.

the ittf does not govern world tt.  there's this false belief that it does.  it only governs the events it sanctions.

you said you sent many emails to adham.  why on earth would you do that (unless you're close friends)??

if you are not playing in ittf events, then whatever rules the ittf makes do NOT apply to YOU.  and even if the governing tt body in your country adopts those rules, but you still don't play in those events, then those rules still don't apply to you.  prez sharara has actually said this on a few occasions.  i wish he would say it more often...

for example, on one of my blades, i use rubber cement, cuz the blade surface is too slick and the water-based glue doesn't make the sponge stick to the wood.  well, that's illegal at ittf events.  but i'm not playing in ittf events so i don't care one whit that it's in violation of their rules. cuz i'm not playing in their events...

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.594 seconds.

Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Web Wiz News
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer

MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd.

Copyright ©2003-2024 Alex Table Tennis Ltd. All rights reserved.