|
|
Ma Long serve training |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | ||||
kenneyy88
Premier Member Joined: 01/06/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4074 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
great serves, interesting motion after contact.
|
||||
Sponsored Links | ||||
Jonan
Premier Member Joined: 02/18/2009 Location: Elsweyr Status: Offline Points: 2933 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I'd also like to point out his toss. It leaves his hand well above his head, and you can tell from the way the hand tilts that he puts spin on it. His quick upward motion that sweeps back over his head keeps it in his hand until it tips and puts the spin on it. So he puts spin on it and contacts it after it drops below where it left his hand.
|
||||
petermoo
Silver Member Joined: 10/13/2003 Location: Jamaica Status: Offline Points: 651 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Fantastic serves!
Thanks for posting. It really is a great privilege to watch a player vastly superior to myself revealed in slow mo! I dont know how good some of the people here are criticizing Ma Longs serves, but it would be interesting if they could post some videos of their serves so I could learn how to serve even better than Ma Long! I watched each serves and I think they are all perfectly legal. The ball is never obscured at any stage from the receiver as far as I can see. Petermoo |
||||
takaaki
Premier Member Joined: 05/07/2006 Status: Offline Points: 3089 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
actually, the discussion is mainly about one serve in particular, the slo-mo at 1:25.
as far as i can see, the serve is technically illegal. i say "technically" because the moment of contact is perfectly visible at this camera angle, which is basically the same view that a righthander standing at his backhand would have. that said, there are 2 things wrong here: firstly, the ball passes behind his head for brief moment before the moment of contact and secondly, his free hand appears to be between the ball and the net at the moment of contact. now, the hand being where it is would obscure the ball from the view of a lefthander standing at his backhand side. so, if i were an ump, i would not say anything if he were playing a righthander. even though the ball passing behind the head is illegal, i wouldn't care, as long as the moment of contact is visible, which is really, in my mind, the most important thing. but if his opponent was a lefthander (and not a teammate, who, one could safely assume, is used to his serves) then i would issue a warning for him to drop the hand faster so that the ball wouldn't pass behind it as it appears to do, at least to me, in this vid. |
||||
FireHorse
Silver Member Joined: 09/05/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 567 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I would like to say that it is a nice video that captures Ma Long's serve practice. I particularly find one particular serve that I think it's illegal but I don't want to get into the debate if it's legal or not. I only want to say that the no-hidden serve rule is not really followed and enforced so sometimes, there are some hidden serves going on during tournaments, so I hope that ITTF will decide to change that rule.
I will stop here about this matter and enjoy the video more to learn from Ma Long. FireHorse |
||||
Current Setup:
Butterfly Primorac Carbon FH: Andro Rassant Grip BH: Andro Rassant PowerGrip |
||||
stiltt
Assistant Admin Joined: 07/15/2007 Location: Location Status: Offline Points: 1029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
is it fair to say that it is easier for #1 in the world to cross borderline more often without being called?
that's what an intelligent player will do to stay at the top. I do not believe being totally 100% fair will help you to stay at or even reach the top. I am ashamed at what I just wrote as it could be considered as an excuse to have an ongoing cheating spirit. I will not edit it because it's a reality: at the top level they will try to stay on borderline because that's where things happen. It reminds me that theory (I do not know if it's right or wrong but I sure like it) that says we should take enough risks to evolve to ensure survival for our genes but not too many in order not to die from too much...evolution baldness. JUST STAY ON THE EDGE BABY!!! |
||||
JKC
Gold Member Joined: 11/12/2006 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 1625 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
When someone foul serves, I always consider whether they are trying to gain an advantage from doing it. In this case ML is clearly trying to gain an advantage by serving in this way. If I was the umpire I would be pulling him up for this serve (if I had the slo-mo replay - which umpires don't). As I am unlikely to be umpiring for him and I doubt whether he would use this serve in a match, I don't think he has a lot to worry about.
|
||||
stiltt
Assistant Admin Joined: 07/15/2007 Location: Location Status: Offline Points: 1029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
yeah man! at any level you got it right. He is just playing on his edge and of course he is able to back off a bit when called. What I am sure about is since he is on that edge even if he wants to be legal all the time, he regularly won't just because of his will to stay borderline: the little lag between the player's will to be legal and his body not to follow exactly all the time will create a problem. I bet it is really hard to judge those people's way in a live situation (DUH!) |
||||
BMonkey
Gold Member Joined: 11/28/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1015 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
|
||||
fiveplyian
Super Member Joined: 10/10/2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 105 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Has anyone seen any guidance as to what the above actually means. What is 'the space' between the ball and the net ? I couldn't find any umpires guidance on it.
If the ball is above my head and I draw a line from ball to top of net then is 'the space' everything above this line ? This seems to be how umpires interpret it as several pros just track their arm down below the 'ball to net line' so their arm is never in this definition of space.
If 'the space' is defined as everything between vertical plane of ball and vertical plane of net then its not remotely enforced.
P.S. This was the second, revised wording of this particular new rule wasn't it ? or do I remember incorrectly ?
|
||||
Ian
|
||||
APW46
Assistant Moderator Joined: 02/02/2009 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3331 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Top players play 'on the edge' of legality. Strictly speaking these serves may be judged by some to be illegal, the free arm is supposed to be moved clear of vision 'as soon as possible' in this case it is not. You rarely see top players faulted though, the umpires are scared, Damien Elois has been serving the most foul serves ever seen to man for years (thrown backwards on to his bat)
|
||||
The Older I get, The better I was.
|
||||
Dagoboz
Super Member Joined: 09/12/2008 Status: Offline Points: 199 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
2.6.5 As soon as the ball has been projected, the server�s free arm and hand shall be removed from the space between the ball and the net. The space between the ball and the net is defined by the ball, the net and its indefinite upward extension.
The rules of serve, player developement, coaching and enforcement by umpires are all very problematic in this sport. For example, alot of people like to consider if an illegal serve gives the server an "advantage" and feel that unless a player gains an advantage then an umpire should not be bothered to call an illegal serve. Witness the US Open last summer. I have done a word search of
and I cannot find the word "advantage".
I think it is interesting how the rules of serve reference the umpire of a match. After the ball has been struck during the serve play may only proceed if the umpire is "satisfied", not the server, not the reciever, not the audience and not the forum members, but the umpire himself. There may be times when the umpire is "doubtful of the legality of a service" or times when the umpire regards a serve as a "clear failure to comply with the requirements for a correct service". That leaves us with 3 possibilities:
a satisfied umpire
an unsure umpire
a clearly convinced of failure umpire
The first option bodes well for the server but the last two options do not. The last two options are the fault of the server not the umpire and should have nothing to do with "advantage".
|
||||
Blade: Maze
FH: Something BH: Something Else |
||||
johnny89atc
Gold Member Joined: 06/28/2008 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1600 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I remember that Adam Sharara said in a thread about serving that Ma Long pushes the rules of legal serving to their limits more than any other player...
|
||||
Blade: OSP Virtuoso-L RST 87gr
FH: Butterfly Tenergy 05 FX 2.1 BH: Butterfly Tenergy 05 1.9 |
||||
ZingyDNA
Platinum Member Joined: 09/19/2008 Status: Offline Points: 2373 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Yes, the ITTF president singled him out, no wonder he frequently gets faulted even when he serves legally. I guess the refs got the memo... |
||||
APW46
Assistant Moderator Joined: 02/02/2009 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3331 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
The ITTF do not care about Us, they bring in rules that can only possibly be enforced in top Pro competition, I have had many emails with Adham, he is a good guy, but the ITTF make a clear distinction between what it deems as as international pro players and Us lot, we don't register, we are nothing, there is no distinction in the eyes of the ITTF between YOU, and a casual player who books a table at a leisure centre.
|
||||
The Older I get, The better I was.
|
||||
takaaki
Premier Member Joined: 05/07/2006 Status: Offline Points: 3089 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
the ittf writes the rules for their events. it's up to individual countries to decide if they themselves want to adopt those rules for their events as well. the ittf does not govern world tt. there's this false belief that it does. it only governs the events it sanctions. you said you sent many emails to adham. why on earth would you do that (unless you're close friends)?? if you are not playing in ittf events, then whatever rules the ittf makes do NOT apply to YOU. and even if the governing tt body in your country adopts those rules, but you still don't play in those events, then those rules still don't apply to you. prez sharara has actually said this on a few occasions. i wish he would say it more often... for example, on one of my blades, i use rubber cement, cuz the blade surface is too slick and the water-based glue doesn't make the sponge stick to the wood. well, that's illegal at ittf events. but i'm not playing in ittf events so i don't care one whit that it's in violation of their rules. cuz i'm not playing in their events... |
||||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |