|
|
Y does Joo Se Hyuk win??? |
Post Reply | Page <12345> |
Author | |
sidofmillenium
Gold Member Joined: 12/22/2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1504 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It used to be taught a lot, but low success rate proved chopping to be not an effective style.
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
Ginko Tai Kim
Gold Member Joined: 03/23/2007 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1758 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If the nets are raised than everyone reverts back to high spin loops. Hitters and loop drivers would be disadvantaged.
Pip blockers would have a easier time I guess same with the defenders. |
|
bogeyhunter
Gold Member Joined: 02/22/2006 Location: Jacksonville, F Status: Offline Points: 1245 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I still don't understand why you are trying to call this style inefective. Lost to Redman?
|
|
www.NexyUSA.com
We also carries Sauer & Tröger. Lissom O+EASY P 1mm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_65FLO2Lneo https://youtu.be/YgYFPJCBCr0 https://youtu.be/NeHp789Lb1c https://youtu.be/_65FLO2Lneo |
|
asyraf
Silver Member Joined: 07/12/2008 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Points: 654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
he is good than ma long on that day..
|
|
Blade: TBS
FH: Sriver L 2.1mm BH: Vega Europe Max |
|
Ginko Tai Kim
Gold Member Joined: 03/23/2007 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1758 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I found this
link: http://www.pipfacts.info/content/view/66/87/ Quote: CLASSIC & MODERN DEFENCE � BASIC TECHNIQUES AND TACTICS. 1. Introduction. Defending away from the table, made famous by masters of the art such as Ding Song, feared for his supreme staying-power and his ferocious attacks, or willow-waisted Tong Ling, who seemed to win her matches lightly dancing an intricate ballet, is the most spectacular as well as the most demanding style in table tennis. The classic defender mainly chops from about two paces or more behind the table, coming in fast regularly to push short returns or attack weak ones; the modern defender alternates even more between defending and attacking. A defender has, therefore, to be able to move very quickly from side to side, covering a considerable distance since six feet behind the table balls tend to travel fast out of reach, and at that he has to be able to move quickly in and out. Moreover, at the end of every rush he has to be able to poise himself perfectly and then flawlessly chop, push, block, loop or smash. Not only fleet feet and a great sense of balance are absolutely necessary assets in this style, but the defender must be able to execute each and every attacking stroke as well as all defensive techniques. After three years of ardent practice an attacker will be more or less completely skilled, but at that point the defender�s education will have just begun. Defence, be it classic or modern, is the high-school of table tennis and if you wish to attend its classes you should be aware that you will have to do so for a considerable time and spend a lot of effort. You might well ask if all this labour is worth it. As a defender will you eventually be more than a match for attackers? Theoretically, yes. Backspin as a means to defeat your opponent is superior to topspin. Firstly, because topspin is produced by swinging upward, against gravity, using groups of muscles which are normally less strong than the groups of muscles used to hack downward, assisted by gravity, in order to produce backspin (try to fell a tree hacking head-high; then try felling it knee-high; and see what you like best). Secondly, because topspin can be used against the player producing it, for it can be actively blocked and redirected; but against backspin, using inverted rubber, one can either push or try to counter by producing at least as much topspin, so your opponent will have to give up the initiative or spend more energy than you did to try and gain it. Thirdly, your opponent cannot really afford to return heavy backspin balls when they are dropping; this severely limits his reaction-time and therefore cramps his style, whereas the defender prefers to take the ball when it is dropping and therefore has all the time in the world to play his game. In practice, however, the advantage of the defender over the attacker is not as clear-cut. The defender will chop mostly well away from the table and as a result the ball will travel farther than a ball hit by an attacker who is typically standing close to the table. The defender�s ball will, therefore, in general lose speed and spin more than the ball hit by the attacker. The loss of speed is not much of a problem; the loss of spin is. Moreover, the introduction of the 40 mm ball, which loses spin and speed faster than the 38 mm ball, has been to the advantage of the attacker in this respect. It is still possible to deliver more chop than an attacker can handle, though, if the defender stays somewhat closer to the table than Ding Song used to do in his glorious days. Modern defensive styles as adopted by e.g. South-Korean female player Park Mi Young or Svetlana Ganina from Russia display this change in basic position. Seemingly a disadvantage, it has been turned into a gain, because attacking from this shorter distance is easier. As a result, the modern defender now may be more dangerous than ever before. How is it then, you might ask again, that there are so few defenders among the world�s top-players? There are two answers to this question. The first answer is that the number of defenders amongst top-players actually is disproportional high: 3 in the top 15 of men, 7 in the top 40 of women, if I counted right. That is 1 in 3 and 1 in 6 respectively, whereas I would estimate the rate of defenders to attackers in the total population of table tennis players to be more like 1 in 20 or 30. The second answer is that one probably would find even more defenders at the top, if more young players would choose to adopt this style. However, defensive styles are unpopular because it takes quite a long time to master them � much longer than attacking styles. Ours is an era of impatience; success has to come quickly or people will turn away to find other opportunities. Typically, it will take more than a year to make an accomplished defender out of an accomplished attacker. Most players who set out at this course quit after about three months; this is known as �the defender�s dip� and is caused by the grim fact that stepping up from attack to defence will initially mean you lose most matches you would have won before. You will start to win some after half a year of backbreaking training and again half a year further on you may be almost back on the level of competition you were used to. After that, however, you will start to shine. And defenders generally outlast attackers, so you may shine for a long, long time. Becoming a defender, then, will be far from easy and the choice should not be made light-heartedly. But if you are willing to dedicate yourself completely to the sheer beauty of this style, you will reach the apex of table tennis. 2. The essence of defence. Outline of the style. If you want to defend, you must be attacked. Think of yourself as a city; having an impregnable wall is not enough to defeat your enemy � your opponent must be provoked to try and breach it or his weaknesses will not be exposed and you will not be able to exploit them and bring him on his knees. The idea of classic defence is to be besieged in such a way that the enemy attacks in vain and in the end is worn out, either to die in the field or to receive your coup de gr�ce. The idea of modern defence, however, is to be besieged in such a way that the enemy attacks in vain and while doing so rapidly becomes vulnerable for quickly mounted counter-attacks. Modern defence is generally faster, more deceptive and less safe than classic defence, because it is more provocative � it needs to be, because modern enemies are often so heavily armed (fast frames with fast rubbers generating massive spin) that they will breach your wall if you let them go on blasting at it. Whether you are a classic or a modern defender, your wall of defence should be equally perfect. No cracks, no fissures, no flaws. In table tennis this means you have to be able to bring back every ball. Furthermore, as any wall may be broken in time if the enemy is allowed a concentrated attack on it, you have to scatter his force and disrupt his assault � time and again. This means you must deny your opponent the opportunity to fully deploy his topspin and, if he succeeds in deploying it nonetheless, counter it in such a way that he will not have another opportunity to fully deploy it. Impregnability and disruption are the keys to a successful defence. An unsuccessful enemy will weaken and get exhausted; yet you may have to finish him off and this is the only instance in which a classic defender should actually attack. Behind the table this means you will wait for your opponent to miss and use his mistakes to win the point yourself. The more modern you are as a defender, the more you will try to force errors and use them. From all this it can be seen why your main tool is backspin. Firstly, because against no-spin and topspin the full force of topspin can be used for the attack; since there is no need to lift the ball, all energy of the stroke can be used for spin and forward speed. But against backspin part of the energy must be used to lift the ball; the result is less forward speed, so the attack is half-smothered. Using backspin means draining the opponent�s energy. Secondly, lifting a backspin ball is even harder (more likely: unsuccessful) when it is dropping after the bounce. This limits the possibilities the attacker has; he will have to hit the ball on the rise. Therefore using backspin cramps his style. Thirdly, using backspin against a topspin ball means (if it is done correctly) you are continuing the spin, instead of trying to stop it and replace it with spin of your own. So, all in all, using backspin means you are not only redirecting and draining your opponent�s energy, you are actually tapping it, turning the force of his attack against him. Nevertheless, a classic defender may still use topspin, but will do so merely for the coup de gr�ce. A modern defender will use topspin attacks far more frequently, to disrupt his opponent�s play and force him to make errors. Now, for a rough outline of the defensive styles it is useful to discern between three zones of defence: you have to return balls from between the net and the middle of the table (first zone of defence), or between the middle of the table and its end or close behind it (second zone of defence), or from (much) further behind the table (third zone of defence). In the first zone you will kill the occasional high ball, but almost always balls in this area will be low and you will push them aggressively, placing them deep to provoke the half-smothered topspin attack (mentioned above) in the second or, preferably, the third zone. At that, a modern defender may decide to go for a flip every once in a while. The third zone is where your strength really lies if you are a classic defender, since away from the table you are able to chop with full force. Here you will almost always chop, because chopping means making full use of your opponent�s attack, continuing his topspin as backspin and if possible adding to it. A ball too high to chop, here, will be a ball to kill. But the modern defender may also decide to loop aggressively in this zone. In the second zone you will again kill a high ball and for the rest either chop-block or chop-push (I will explain this term later on), placing the ball deep in order to provoke a topspin ball in the third zone. For the modern defender, looping is an option. From this it will be clear that not only you will have to move to the left and to the right in order to get to the ball, but that you will also move to the table (in) and away from it (out) a lot; in fact, as a classic defender you will move in to move out and as a modern defender you will be all over the place. This determines your basic position behind the table: you should stand at a point from which you can comfortably reach balls in all three zones. Too close to the table means you will have problems going away from it in order to chop; too far away and you will not reach the balls in the first zone. Your basic position as a classic defender is, therefore, about a yard from the table, with your right hip behind the middle line (if you are right-handed; because your reach at the backhand side is somewhat less than at the forehand side). During play you must always be able to reach any ball, so you have to come back to this position after every move you make. It is useful to imagine a rectangle, occupying the court from one small step to your right to one small step to your left and a good step backward; your basic position is in the middle of the front line of this rectangle and, moving around the court, you should try and keep at least one leg inside it at all times. If your defensive style is more modern, your basic position is (for right-handed players) more to the left and closer to the table; this will give you more room to use your forehand attack strokes. ....and it's goes on and on |
|
RedMan
Super Member Joined: 12/02/2007 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 214 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have read that before. Its still great.
|
|
Blade: Victas Koji Matsush*ta FL
FH: Donic Bluefire JP03 in 2.0 Black BH: TSP P1r Curl 1.5-1.7 Red |
|
sidofmillenium
Gold Member Joined: 12/22/2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1504 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
that only applies against pure topspin loopers, which r like none. If a looper is to sidespin, and switches side, he can use spinreversal to his advantage. And also trouble chopper w/ wide angles.
|
|
RedMan
Super Member Joined: 12/02/2007 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 214 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It is very hard to lift a heavy chop using side spin. It won't work. Any good chopper will not a looper get set and allow them to loop to where they want. We will always keep them on the move. You try to put side spin on any chop and it will end up in the net.
|
|
Blade: Victas Koji Matsush*ta FL
FH: Donic Bluefire JP03 in 2.0 Black BH: TSP P1r Curl 1.5-1.7 Red |
|
sidofmillenium
Gold Member Joined: 12/22/2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1504 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I wouldn't be a chop to begin w/. b/c their rubber isn't capable of producing great spin by itself, I will start w/ sidespin. Mix top in middle. Plus, I lift it all the time....u need good technique to be able to do it...but it works better if u do.
|
|
zwu168
Super Member Joined: 04/08/2009 Status: Offline Points: 301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
OC WRB
FH: Hurricane 2 BH: CJ8000 |
|
bogeyhunter
Gold Member Joined: 02/22/2006 Location: Jacksonville, F Status: Offline Points: 1245 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
www.NexyUSA.com
We also carries Sauer & Tröger. Lissom O+EASY P 1mm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_65FLO2Lneo https://youtu.be/YgYFPJCBCr0 https://youtu.be/NeHp789Lb1c https://youtu.be/_65FLO2Lneo |
|
liXiao
Premier Member Joined: 11/27/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6145 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
what is interesting is that yoshida really destroyed joo se hyuk, i really wanted to see the match and see what happened.
|
|
Gewo Aruna Hinoki Carbon
Gewo Nexxus EL Pro 53 SuperSelect Yinhe Qing |
|
beeray1
Premier Member Joined: 07/03/2008 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 5169 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've always wanted to be a chopper, but i dont because of a few reasons.
Nobody teaches it, I wouldn't know other than reading up how to do what I need to do. For example.. making a dead ball chop. How in the heck do i learn to do stuff like that other than reading up, and trial and error. This would just lead to my ineffectiveness because i never fully learned what I'm doing. Can one learn spin reversal and variance when chopping through trial and error alone? This is also what annoys me when people play 'junk rubber'. Because most of the time, THEY dont even know what they're doing with the ball. I dont want to fall into that category.
Also, there isn't enough room where I play to be an effective chopper. But I've always thought the modern defensive game was amazing, and I feel like i would have the most fun playing like that. If i had a reliable way of learning what I was doing, then I wouldnt care about limited space. I'd still play it, because its fun.
|
|
jkillashark
Silver Member Joined: 03/14/2007 Location: Bay Area Status: Offline Points: 561 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think the players who use spinny loops tend to have more trouble playing against Joo. Ma Long's loop is not like WLQ who uses a loop stroke to start a rally but starts driving the ball ASAP the topspin rally starts. Ma Long's more loop like stroke causes problems for topspin-topspin players but it makes it harder once he runs into topspin-backspin play. WLQ when he plays will loop. soft loop, until the balls a little bit high, then starts pounding it.
|
|
Butterfly Viscaria FL
FH: Black DHS Neo Hurricane 3 Blue Sponge National BH: Red Butterfly Tenergy 80 Footwork and forehand is always the answer. |
|
beeray1
Premier Member Joined: 07/03/2008 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 5169 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
WLQ is also more experienced in playing against various styles. He's got 10 years on Ma Long. On top of his more fitting playing style... WLQ is also a smarter player than Ma Long. 9 times out of 10, he makes Joo look like a top 300 player instead of a top 20 player. But that just goes to show how style matchups matter.. you cant just say "well, because i beat player X, and then player X beat player Y, then I can beat player Y." Player Y can end up making you look like a fool in front of your mother.
Joo in my opinion is so strong because he can move better than most, so he gets to almost every ball. He is also better at FH to FH counter looping than most of the players in the top 100. He's more unpredictable than a lot of choppers out there, and his BH chop is super consistent. But when he hits that first FH and it comes back, he runs around the table like Ryu with his FH's. And a lot of times you see him come out on top. Its either a straight winner, or a counter looping rally, but he comes out on top.
He's just a crafty crafty fellow. I've seen him twiddle for a BH counterhit down the line close to the table when they were expecting a chop. Impressive man.
|
|
zwu168
Super Member Joined: 04/08/2009 Status: Offline Points: 301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
OC WRB
FH: Hurricane 2 BH: CJ8000 |
|
zwu168
Super Member Joined: 04/08/2009 Status: Offline Points: 301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
OC WRB
FH: Hurricane 2 BH: CJ8000 |
|
beeray1
Premier Member Joined: 07/03/2008 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 5169 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
are you seirous about the comment with WLQ??? first off, he was saying MA LONG over does a looping stroke while WLQ uses one or two and then starts pounding the ball. What you said is backwards ignorance. WLQ has no trouble at all getting into position to kill the ball.. that's why HES the one killing the ball, and MA LONG is the one LOOPING it. It also helps when you look at WLQ's record with Joo vs Ma Long's record with Joo. Joo is usually target practice for WLQ... and Ma Long just happens to have lost to Joo very very recently.
all that second comment shows is insecurties in your own game. And please note I am talking about the modern defensive game.. you know.. involving an agressive FH. It's a great game to me because of the variety involved in playing it, and the extra two levels of awareness you have to have when playing it.. instead of "How many times can i loop or smash the ball over and over?" It's a more dynamic game. Its not at all about just waiting for your opponent to make a mistake and hit the net.. Have you ever seen Joo play? he typically hits as many or more winners than his strictly-offensive opponents.
|
|
Jonan
Premier Member Joined: 02/18/2009 Location: Elsweyr Status: Offline Points: 2933 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I see attacker and defender simply as two halves of the same coin. "Defenders" could also be seen simply as backspin attackers, because chops are loops with the opposite spin. They are just very consistent anti-loopers. Offensive players block, do backspin long pushes and throw in chops.
I agree with there are few defenders because people dont teach it. People want to smash things fast, my friend enjoys his fast forehand chops, and they can be random and a very tough change or pace, but his coach hates it when he does it, because he wants him to stick to looping and attacking. |
|
ryanp
Super Member Joined: 10/27/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Joo is the MAN. he is amazing.
|
|
t05 fx, diamant & wing passion medium
|
|
sidofmillenium
Gold Member Joined: 12/22/2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1504 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
There used to be tons of defensive players, but the reason they decreased is b/c the faster u can give the ball the opponent, and the more trouble he will be in, and topspin makes better arc. Also, I m pretty sure if Joo Se Hyuk won the world championship, including me, everyone would be a chopper, but the deal is, there is no funding in defensive players b/c everyone knows, they dont win.(its not the other way around)
|
|
RedMan
Super Member Joined: 12/02/2007 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 214 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I disagree. The reason that there is not a lot of good choppers is it takes too long to learn how to be a good chopper. No one is willing to take the time to learn. Its easier to be a attacker. The game nowadays is geared more toward attackers also. Some people find defenders are boring. We are not boring. We are just very patient players.
|
|
Blade: Victas Koji Matsush*ta FL
FH: Donic Bluefire JP03 in 2.0 Black BH: TSP P1r Curl 1.5-1.7 Red |
|
ryanp
Super Member Joined: 10/27/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
+1
you need to have skills, patience, consistency and smart to be a good defender. for me, i find good defenders to be amazing and exciting.
defenders don't win? come on, don't be so narrow minded.
|
|
t05 fx, diamant & wing passion medium
|
|
TBS9x
Gold Member Joined: 10/24/2008 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 1143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I totally agree with RedMan.After a while practicing long pips - modern chopper style , I found out that it's much harder than learn the attacking style using inverted rubbers.You can see very clearly through my example : loop is the stroke that is used the most by loopers and chop is the stroke that is used the most by choppers and which one is harder ? Do I have to say ? 15 spinny, powerful loops in a row is quite hard but still ok ,but 15 chops that go low, spinny and long ? I dont think many of us can do that.Just because people nowadays are taking the easy way, the short way doesnt mean defenders are boring, it's just harder and take more time.Choppers are just attackers that use backspin.Do they call loopers,... attackers because they use the stroke that gives the ball more spin, more spin so it hits the table and go off and score a point ? If chops are that easy to execute and so fast, so spinny then I'm sure defender isnt suitable for calling people that chops.
|
|
bbkon
Premier Member Joined: 04/19/2005 Location: Afghanistan Status: Offline Points: 7260 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
thats not true, how joo style can be unique if he is a copy of ding song playing, but ding had suberb serves that joo doesnt joo is not deceptive as ding but he is retired
|
|
TBS9x
Gold Member Joined: 10/24/2008 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 1143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Everyone's game is unique because we dont play exactly 100% like others.Ding Song couldnt unleash such powerful fh loops all the time like Joo, and btw Joo has very good serves also, bear in mind that good serves dont give you point directly but they dont allow your opponent to give you back a strong attack or even give you opportunity to setup your attack.
|
|
sidofmillenium
Gold Member Joined: 12/22/2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1504 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Defensive style is obviously more consistent, and one can eliminate the variable of spin b/c of the junk rubber. The only ppl who still use junk rubber r those who r stuck with the times of the past. All the new players that r coming out, r using untuned, grippy tense rubbers....Although in my opinion, tacky rubbers r inferior to tension rubbers as well...but if u want to be the most consistent, 1 side tacky, and 1 side long pips...and u have got the best combo. But at higher level, u need more than consistency, u need to force your opponents to miss by making the ball go faster. B/c of the highest techniques, spin variation wont do much, same goes for drop shots. Choppers have no shot at winning world title anymore. They r simply inferior.
|
|
Jonan
Premier Member Joined: 02/18/2009 Location: Elsweyr Status: Offline Points: 2933 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It's spelled "are" and "you" and this is what we call trolling, attacking groups of people and starting unending arguments, like how tacky rubber sucks, junk rubber users are stuck in the past, and choppers are no longer any good. |
|
theman
Premier Member Joined: 09/22/2006 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 7234 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
well he started the topic and sid is actually exploring the philosophical side of tt? so i guess he needs to ask why and start making claims?
|
|
pongmaster
Silver Member Joined: 02/18/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 665 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think when you look at the ratio in high level choppers to attackers compared to the ratio of juniors who start out as choppers to those who are loopers/attackers i don't think that the future of choppers is all too grim, just not enough juniors choose to play the defensive style. If it was half and half, i would bet that choppers would be able to occupy a good number of spots in the top 100 ;).
"There used to be tons of defensive players, but the reason they decreased is b/c the faster u can give the ball the opponent, and the more trouble he will be in, and topspin makes better arc. Also, I m pretty sure if Joo Se Hyuk won the world championship, including me, everyone would be a chopper, but the deal is, there is no funding in defensive players b/c everyone knows, they dont win.(its not the other way around)" i guess you'd agree a big reason choppers dont have as much success at the top level is because its being undermined at the beginning levels. but the reason you provide to why that's true is because choppers are not successful in the first place. You just have your order wrong. The reason why choppers are not having as much success is because nobody starts out being choppers, not vice-versa. The warrants as to why choppers suck and never win is basically using Joo's loss to Schlager in the final of the WTTC. for some reason, Joo losing 4-2 in the finals of the WTTC = "no funding in defensive players b/c everyone knows, they dont win" |
|
Blade: BTY Matsush*ta Pro Special Arylate Carbon
FH:H3 BH:Spectol |
|
Post Reply | Page <12345> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |