|
|
EL-S or Bluestorm Z1 |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
Chopper88
Gold Member Joined: 06/24/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1064 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 04/01/2018 at 1:29pm |
|
I been going back and forth between the 2 rubbers, not good effect to tell which one has more spin. anyone who try both , need some opinions ...
|
||
Sponsored Links | ||
jpenmaster
Platinum Member Joined: 12/24/2008 Location: Chicago Status: Offline Points: 2176 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have played both rubbers and to me they are very different. EL-S is slower and generates a little more spin on slower shots. Z1 is faster and on all out strokes generates more spin. My issue with the new Bluestorm rubbers (Z1/Z2) was the throw angle. It may have been the blades but it just seemed really low.
Edited by jpenmaster - 04/01/2018 at 3:46pm |
||
OSP Expert II w DNA Dragon Grip
|
||
slevin
Premier Member Joined: 03/15/2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 3602 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
To me Z1 throw angle is higher than that of MX-P which is higher than that of EL-S.
|
||
Trade feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787 |
||
Chopper88
Gold Member Joined: 06/24/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1064 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not worry about the throw at all, it’s spin I need , maybe should just go back to T05
|
||
jpenmaster
Platinum Member Joined: 12/24/2008 Location: Chicago Status: Offline Points: 2176 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I went back to T05..
|
||
OSP Expert II w DNA Dragon Grip
|
||
Chopper88
Gold Member Joined: 06/24/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1064 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
👍😂 |
||
rocketman222
Gold Member Joined: 01/06/2007 Location: Walnut Creek,CA Status: Offline Points: 1152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yep, the new crop of esn rubbers all seem to have very low spin and speed on slower shots.
|
||
NextLevel
Forum Moderator Joined: 12/15/2011 Location: Somewhere Good Status: Offline Points: 14845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Every rubber has that problem vs Tenergy 05.
|
||
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon FH/BH: H3P 41D. Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train... |
||
Chopper88
Gold Member Joined: 06/24/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1064 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It’s a shame the newer esn still have issues, with these new balls my loops are getting crushed , trying to save money and still need to go back to T05
|
||
CroNone
Member Joined: 09/13/2015 Location: NZ Status: Offline Points: 59 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm really liking BSZ1. I play a more forward loop game than a spin game but honestly, if you need spin and brush hard Z1 offers plenty. The speed of agressive loops is amazing I find.
Z1 on FH with Viscaria. If you play a spin game T05 is a great choice obviously. Edited by CroNone - 04/01/2018 at 11:59pm |
||
rocketman222
Gold Member Joined: 01/06/2007 Location: Walnut Creek,CA Status: Offline Points: 1152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I feel the latest generation has gone way more linear than the previous ones. I don't know but it seems to me that they are going the hurricane route! |
||
slevin
Premier Member Joined: 03/15/2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 3602 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
The following is just personal observation. Yours may vary: IMHO, not quite true. It is just that the good varietals of current gen rubbers (in discussion) like Rhyzer 48 or Bluestorm Z1 have harder sponge than T05. In reality, this property depends on:
But let us just talk about the impact of the 1st attribute - sponge hardness (to keep things simple). 1. Find the rubbers offering most spin at their sponge hardness, starting from 37 deg to 50deg (say) 2. Compare bounciness and spin on low velocity impact of that rubber vs T05 You shall find that at very low velocity impact strokes (slow ball + slow blade speed), these softer rubbers (like T05FX or R42, for example) offer more spin and are more bouncy than T05. But of course, once velocity of impact increases, T05 spin and power is greater. This same property of European / Japanese rubbers can be extrapolated to rubbers with sponge harder than T05 sponge - optimal spin for harder sponged rubbers occurs at higher velocity impact strokes than for T05. This is why, the harder sponged rubbers are marketed to higher rated players - the assumption being that because of their superior timing & technique, they can generated faster blade head speed & are capable of generating the optimal spin on more strokes than the rest of us mortals. This is also why, reportedly, players like Samsonov & Quadri (who use ESN) reportedly use harder sponges than commercially available. Also why T05 pros (like Boll) get the heaviest sheets for their FH (the assumption being that the heavier sheets have the harder sponges). Once you do get used to a rubber (ie: have strokes developed to generate optimal spin for those hardness sponge), you shall not like the performance when you move to either a harder or softer sponge unless you change your stroke. That being said, the current thin-topsheet rubbers obfuscate this. Not all rubbers though. For example, take the stroke of looping a (slow) half-long no-spin serve. I find that R47 is not very good at this (very stiff topsheet). However, Rhyzer 48 (thin topsheet like R47 but unlike R47 topsheet, this one is softer) is excellent at this. Of course, then, it must 'give back' some gains somewhere else (I haven't played enough, but so far, I feel that it may be in looping very high velocity no-spin strokes). Re: T05 - it is just that most club level players (1700 - 2200) have racket head speeds with which they can generate optimal spin on standard starting strokes using T05. Admittedly, I am generalizing a bit here but: I can see this in many athletic European (T05-using) player matches live (and I saw this in 2017 Joola NA Teams as well). While these player are slower (and less explosive at the table) than the Chinese pros, their greater muscle mass means that they can generate more power away from the table once there with the same equipment. Once both players are counterlooping away from the table, this point is obvious: they have reached their spin limit with T05 at lower speed (in other words, for those away-from-the-table strokes, a harder sponged ESN rubber with smaller pores size would give them better spin). But, of course, that is not the only stroke at which they would be able to get better spin. Of course, this does not mean that any harder sponged rubber would offer better spin than T05 at higher impact loops. Just the better varietals. Edited by slevin - 04/02/2018 at 2:45pm |
||
Trade feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787 |
||
rocketman222
Gold Member Joined: 01/06/2007 Location: Walnut Creek,CA Status: Offline Points: 1152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Here's the thing, since we are talking about different esn generations, take g1,mxp and r47, they are all supposed to be the same hardness more or less, but you can see that they are very different at low speed shots.
|
||
slevin
Premier Member Joined: 03/15/2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 3602 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes, due to variations in the other 4 attributes I mentioned above (pore size, pip structure, etc). But if you vary only one property (sponge hardness in my example above) and keep the rest constant, I think that the above relationship works. Anyways, my post was dissecting a bit too much, isn't it! As is correctly often said, proper training trumps everything.
|
||
Trade feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787 |
||
rocketman222
Gold Member Joined: 01/06/2007 Location: Walnut Creek,CA Status: Offline Points: 1152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I agree with you on the 'what is causing this rubber behaviour?' part, but I am mostly interested in the 'why is ESN going in this direction?' , if you think of the average club player, they really don't have the hand-speed to use these effectively.
|
||
nv42
Super Member Joined: 01/22/2013 Location: india Status: Offline Points: 466 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
One thing that I really hate abt these new gen rubbers is the not so great spin on serves compared to the older generation stuff.
|
||
1.dhs pg2 fl
-FH t05h (max) -BH tibhar genius (max) |
||
Stavros
Gold Member Joined: 12/02/2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
EL-S vs. Bluestorm Z1 regarding durability ?
|
||
InfinityVPS - D80 - D05
|
||
Chopper88
Gold Member Joined: 06/24/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1064 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Durability is better on Bluestorm , try it again last night , both rubbers was on the same kind of blade, ELS is a bit slower and still not enough spin, Bluestorm is a bit better but nothing like wow, just order T05 😣 |
||
DreiZ
Platinum Member Joined: 06/01/2009 Location: New York, US Status: Offline Points: 2576 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I played with ELS for few months. Went back to T05 as well. My 7 month old T05 spins better than 2-3 month old ELS, same hours per week played. Tried Bluestorm on a friend's racket and didn't like the feel too much. Cant comment on spin capabilities.
Edited by DreiZ - 04/03/2018 at 11:57am |
||
Main:
Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC 85g FH/BH: Glayzer 09C 2.1mm Chopper: Stratus Power Defense 85g FH: Hybrid K3 max BH: Grass D.TecS 0.9mm USATT: 1725 |
||
ghostzen
Silver Member Joined: 08/15/2010 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 881 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Z1 Is pretty durable compared to EL-S. Seems to hold it top sheet well.
|
||
Stavros
Gold Member Joined: 12/02/2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Against heavy underspin Z1 and ELS are faster than T05, aren 't they?
|
||
InfinityVPS - D80 - D05
|
||
Chopper88
Gold Member Joined: 06/24/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1064 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Kinda , it’s easier to lift but will not have a bunch of spin, that was my issue, both are super easy to play with, but nothing good on the ball |
||
Stavros
Gold Member Joined: 12/02/2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Playing table tennis for 37 years, I think that a secure fast loop is much better than a slow spinny loop that is also more difficult to execute because the spinny rubber is very susceptible to opponent's spin. Edited by Stavros - 04/07/2018 at 11:58am |
||
InfinityVPS - D80 - D05
|
||
unstopabl3
Silver Member Joined: 06/16/2011 Status: Offline Points: 685 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Great discussion and since all of you are using or have used these modern ESN rubbers I'd like your input on a few things.
From the following rubbers: Z1 MX-P R48 Aurus Prime Gold Arc 8 Tenergy 05 1) Rate them in terms of spin on serves and slow spiny opening loops 2) Rate them in terms of topspin rallies 3) Rate them in terms of speed 4) Rate them in terms of durability ( shrinkage, topsheet or sponge crumbling ) 5) Is it still worth spending $70+ for Tenergy rubbers? Thanks in advance. |
||
SmackDAT
Platinum Member Joined: 01/01/2012 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 2231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Go for a MX-P with the 4 for 3 deal and buy some booster, best value for money to be honest. I don't like ultramax rubbers for forehand as they are too linear
I use Aurus Prime on BH because I like the dwell of ultramax, but most importantly soft topsheet for backhand flicks.
|
||
unstopabl3
Silver Member Joined: 06/16/2011 Status: Offline Points: 685 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have had used MX-P in max thickness for about a year before switching to DHS GA 8. It was a crazy good rubber, super fast, great on serves and slow spiny loops but it was hard to do counter rallies from mid distance as it required greater power/effort. This was evident especially after a couple of weeks of usage when the factory booster started wearing off and the rubber started to shrink. Due to these reasons I tried DHS GA 8 and fell in love with it, although it is not as fast or spiny, it suits my game and gives me great confidence in pressure situations and it's quite durable. I gave trials and got selected for Nationals with this great rubber. However, now that I am playing with much higher rated players ( National Level ) I feel that it's lacking the speed and spin to cause my opponents much difficulty in returning my shots. I have tried Tenergy 05, 64, 80 briefly and switched them on my BH as for some reason I could not utilize them to their full potential on my FH. I could not generate enough speed or spin with them as compared to MX-P or DHA GA 8. Could it be my technique or case of fake Tenergies? |
||
Chopper88
Gold Member Joined: 06/24/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1064 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Got a chance tonight to hit with my new T05, it start feeling slow the once it kinda like broken in , wow I forgot how much I like this rubber, my serves were about the same but looping was with better spin, play a 1800-1900ish chopper, I had no issue looping his best chops with his LP,
|
||
Stavros
Gold Member Joined: 12/02/2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A friend of mine who has played both rubbers, say that spin and control are similar to both rubbers. Z1 is slightly faster.
|
||
InfinityVPS - D80 - D05
|
||
SmackDAT
Platinum Member Joined: 01/01/2012 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 2231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
MXP lacks power? It's a lot faster than most rubbers, and at least as fast as those rubbers you speak of. It is a firm rubber once boost effect wears off so maybe that's why |
||
SmackDAT
Platinum Member Joined: 01/01/2012 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 2231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A lot of top players in the UK like boosted MXP both sides with a 7 ply clipper like blade (namely FPBE), talking top 5
|
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |